Skins going after Albert Haynesworth?

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

dad23hogjrs wrote:I don't want haynesorth for the simple fact of making a guy the highest paid Def player when hasn't played a full season since he was a rookie, and he will be 28 at start of season


He'll most likely become the highest paid defensive player no matter which team signs him. Yes, he's missed some games, but his performance when healthy has earned him that size of a contract.

A few years ago he would have fallen more into the buyer-beware category, but after coming back from an unfortunate incident of on-field violence he has turned his career around. The low motor and work-ethic issues of the past are gone. In Tennessee, Haynesworth was a dominant force at the point of attack and the Titans built their defense around him. Their goal was to bring outside pressure and funnel the ball back inside, where Haynesworth was taking on (and beating) double-team blocks and making plays around the line of scrimmage. He was the best unrestricted free agent coming into the process and probably will hit the open market.
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

I feel we have guys that can keep the ball rolling if he has to miss a few games. They aren't great but they'll keep us in games.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
El Mexican
Hog
Posts: 1061
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 11:57 am

Post by El Mexican »

I don't like this AH thing for one reason above all others: there is no way he will live up to the expectations he has created beforehand of his arrival in DC.

We have seen this in the past with other FA, and have not received dividends.

I can't see the difference between fqntqsy football qnd the way DS runs this team. That type of managment has not produced a winning team.
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

El Mexican wrote:I don't like this AH thing for one reason above all others: there is no way he will live up to the expectations he has created beforehand of his arrival in DC.

We have seen this in the past with other FA, and have not received dividends.

I can't see the difference between fqntqsy football qnd the way DS runs this team. That type of managment has not produced a winning team.


I may have to disagree here... I think the purpose of getting him is to allow others to realize their expectations.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
El Mexican wrote:I don't like this AH thing for one reason above all others: there is no way he will live up to the expectations he has created beforehand of his arrival in DC.

We have seen this in the past with other FA, and have not received dividends.

I can't see the difference between fqntqsy football qnd the way DS runs this team. That type of managment has not produced a winning team.


I may have to disagree here... I think the purpose of getting him is to allow others to realize their expectations.


Yeah, I agree Chris. I also agree we have a few others that can step up if AH misses a few games. And this notion of fantasy football crap is just overblown at this point. It's called free agency and every team engages it. There are several teams looking to sign and pay AH, so this idea that the Skins are "trying to buy a championship" is overblown. Just because you've had a few bad relationships in the past doesn't mean you should stop dating altogether.
Bob 0119
The Punisher
The Punisher
Posts: 2592
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Manassas

Post by Bob 0119 »

I don't think AH is coming here. I think as usual, we are agent fodder.

"You'll want to offer my guy alot, 'cuz the Redskins are interested in him"

Saw the same kind of thing with Briggs and CJ.
“If you grow up in metro Washington, you grow up a diehard Redskins fan. But if you hate your parents, you grow up a Cowboys fan.”-Jim Lachey
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Re: Haynesworth - the Neon-Deion of 2009???

Post by CanesSkins26 »

1niksder wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:I didn't realize it was structured like that. Sounds like Danny may be playing Fantasy Football with his burgundy and gold heart, but the business side is still on point. What happens if it it's not an uncapped year, though. How big will the piper's stick be?

They can't get a replacement for Upshaw at the NFLPA so it's almost a given that 2010 will be uncapped, that's when they can dump contracts and see what happens in 2011. Keep in mind that the NFLPA has always stated that if the cap went away it is not coming back.


They have until the Spring of 2010 to get a new CBA finalized. I think it's way too early to be assuming that 2010 will be uncapped year.
Suck and Luck
spudstr04
spudstr04
spudstr04
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:13 am
Location: NC

Post by spudstr04 »

The Washington Redskins plan to pursue Tennessee Titans defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth if he becomes a free agent tomorrow -- though it appears their salary cap situation might prevent them from signing the Pro Bowl performer -- and hope to reach a contract agreement with cornerback DeAngelo Hall before the market opens, NFL sources said yesterday.

The Redskins also have significant interest in Dallas defensive end Chris Canty, according to league sources, who would be a far less expensive alternative to Haynesworth, and are seeking upgrades along the offensive line, though likely only by pursuing second-tier free agents.

League tampering rules prohibit teams from beginning the process of signing free agents before 12:01 a.m. tomorrow. But the sources, who requested anonymity because of the rules, said owner Daniel Snyder and Vinny Cerrato, Washington's executive vice president of football operations, have already laid the groundwork to attempt to acquire Haynesworth, considered the top defensive player who could become available. Another option being considered by the team is Canty, a versatile end who can play the run and pass rush from the interior on third downs.

The team would have the wherewithal to sign only one of those defensive linemen given its limited cap room. The Redskins regard Haynesworth -- who reportedly wants to be the league's highest-paid defensive player -- as one of only a few impact players capable of raising the play of the entire defense. Tennessee, Atlanta, Detroit and Tampa Bay are other teams that have Haynesworth atop their wish lists, according to league sources, with most of those clubs having exponentially more cap space than the Redskins with which to complete deals.

Meanwhile, negotiations with Hall's representatives, Joel Segal and Alvin Keels, began last week during the NFL scouting combine at Indianapolis and remain ongoing, team sources said. Hall could command upwards of $15 million guaranteed. The Redskins, who sat on the sideline during the free agent period last offseason, have made many moves in the past two weeks to create salary cap room, in part, to make a multiyear offer to Hall and compete for Haynesworth, the sources said.

Washington has reworked the contracts of tackle Chris Samuels, defensive tackle Cornelius Griffin, defensive end Andre Carter and wide receiver Antwaan Randle El, and also released linebacker Marcus Washington in an attempt to improve its cap situation, but it remains among the worst in the NFL. The salary cap for the 2009 season will increase to $127 million, roughly $4 million higher than many projections, which provides some relief, but the Redskins entered last week over the cap.

There is some wiggle room. Defensive end Jason Taylor is scheduled to make $8 million in 2009 -- not including a $500,000 roster bonus he is due to receive next week, according to league sources -- but the team could save cap room by restructuring his deal. Cutting veteran cornerback Shawn Springs would yield an additional $6 million in cap savings.

It appears, however, that the Redskins would need much more flexibility to make a viable run at Haynesworth, re-sign Hall -- a top priority in their offseason plan -- and address concerns along the offensive line. In fact, one longtime league official with knowledge of Washington's cap problems said yesterday that he could not envision any scenario, even with creative cap management, in which the Redskins could make a big offer to Haynesworth, bring back Hall and bolster the offensive line in free agency.

Moreover, the Redskins might not get the chance to bid on Haynesworth, who could seek a deal worth more than $30 million guaranteed and averaging $15 million per season. Minnesota Vikings defensive end Jared Allen is the league's top-paid defensive player with $32 million guaranteed as part of a six-year contract that averages $12.2 million per season. As of late last night, the Titans were attempting to reach a deal with Haynesworth before his agent, Chad Speck, could officially accept offers from other teams, according to sources who have spoken with Tennessee officials.

But the Titans are determined to stick with the parameters they set for Haynesworth, unwilling to risk jeopardizing their cap situation even for a player regarded as one of the best, if not the best, at his position in the league. And even if Haynesworth joins the free agent market, the Redskins are expected to face strong competition from teams with better cap situations.

Tampa Bay released five high-priced veterans yesterday, including 11-time Pro Bowl linebacker Derrick Brooks, and is $60 million under the projected cap. The Buccaneers potentially could make a massive offer to Haynesworth and still possess the resources to pursue other top-tier free agents.

The Redskins finished fourth overall in total defense last season, giving up an average of only 288.8 yards per game, but were tied for 28th in the league with only 24 sacks. Haynesworth, 27, a two-time all-pro selection, had a personal-best 8 1/2 sacks -- an impressive total for an interior lineman. Listed at 6 feet 6 and 320 pounds, Haynesworth has excelled at collapsing the pocket from the middle of the line.

Washington's defense, particularly Taylor, could benefit from having a difference-making interior lineman. The team has decided to bring back Taylor, who was injured and unproductive in his first season with Washington, and is considering using him as a strong-side linebacker in an effort to increase his productivity rushing the passer.

Canty, 26, who started all 16 games and had three sacks last season for the Cowboys, is regarded as a younger, more dynamic version of Redskins veteran Phillip Daniels, according to a team source. He could occupy multiple blockers and stuff the run on first and second downs, rush from the inside on third downs and would be much more cost-effective than Haynesworth. The role Canty could fill for the Redskins was Demetric Evans's job last season, which could explain why the team has not extended a contract offer to Evans with him eligible for free agency.

Despite having an offensive line that many in the organization believe is in need of an overhaul, Snyder and Cerrato are not expected to pursue the linemen expected to command big contracts, such as left tackle Marvel Smith and guard Chris Kemoeatu of the Pittsburgh Steelers, and versatile Baltimore Ravens offensive lineman Jason Brown. Cincinnati Bengals right tackle Stacy Andrews, who underwent reconstructive knee surgery last month, could be in the Redskins' budget. Green Bay Packers tackle Mark Tauscher, also coming off injury, could be another option as a value player. Stalwart center Jeff Saturday of the Indianapolis Colts is willing to play guard, his agent said, and could be seen as a value pickup.

With the release of Washington and weak-side linebacker Rocky McIntosh's late-season slide in 2008, the Redskins appear to be in need of help at linebacker, but that may have to come from the draft, with the Redskins showing no signs of being in the market for the better linebackers in this free agent class.

Redskins Note: The team made a tender offer to place kicker Shaun Suisham, a restricted free agent, and is expected to retain defensive tackles Anthony Montgomery and Kedric Golston, who also are restricted free agents. Safety Reed Doughty was not tendered but is expected to re-sign with the team.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/25/AR2009022503965.html?sub=AR
#21 = Forever in our hearts
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

As much as I am against the Haynesworth signing, it does make me wonder how good our defense would actually be with him. I believe that he (or a DT like him) is the asnwer to our defensive woes. I also realize, however, that the offense needs the majority of the attention this off-season. After cosidering all options, I'm torn.
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

VetSkinsFan wrote:As much as I am against the Haynesworth signing, it does make me wonder how good our defense would actually be with him. I believe that he (or a DT like him) is the asnwer to our defensive woes. I also realize, however, that the offense needs the majority of the attention this off-season. After cosidering all options, I'm torn.


It'll be interesting... I don't know if he's the answer, so to speak. He'll be in the answer as far as solidifying a position that is weak. His addition will allow us to further access other potential weaknesses.

Just how weak are our DE's, or LB's and secondary? We don't know really cus it's hugely affected by our DT problem. If we get a rush up the middle but our ends still don't get sacks, we know the issue is with them, etc.

I dont know if he'll make the defense elite but he will at least let us know what else we need to do to get it to that point.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
User avatar
broomboy
Hog
Posts: 974
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:15 am

Post by broomboy »

Say no to Haynesworth children , it will ruin your life :lol:
HEROHAMO
|||
|||
Posts: 4752
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:34 am
Location: SANTA ANA,CA
Contact:

Post by HEROHAMO »

If we could sign a new GM I would glady say no to any free agent.
Sean Taylor starting free safety Heavens team!

21 Forever

"The show must go on."
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Re: Haynesworth - the Neon-Deion of 2009???

Post by 1niksder »

CanesSkins26 wrote:They have until the Spring of 2010 to get a new CBA finalized. I think it's way too early to be assuming that 2010 will be uncapped year.


The NFLPA has trying to find a replacement for Upshaw for six months, it's doesn't seem like the people at the top of the Union are getting along. The last extention took almost two years to reach a agreement, and a lot of the owners weren't happy with it. Guys like "the Danny" and "that dude in Texas" felt they were giving up too much of their own profits and they still haven't come to a agreement on that.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
User avatar
fleetus
Hog
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 9:50 am
Location: Charlottesville, Va.

Post by fleetus »

Bob 0119 wrote:I don't think AH is coming here. I think as usual, we are agent fodder.

"You'll want to offer my guy alot, 'cuz the Redskins are interested in him"

Saw the same kind of thing with Briggs and CJ.


Exactly. and some fans on here are just along for the ride :lol:
Build through the draft!
User avatar
fleetus
Hog
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 9:50 am
Location: Charlottesville, Va.

Re: Haynesworth - the Neon-Deion of 2009???

Post by fleetus »

1niksder wrote:
fleetus wrote:Skins had to restructure ARE, Carter and void Daniels contract just to get UNDER the 123M cap. Then you release some players, Taylor being the #1 target. Fine, but they were considering moving him part time to OLB where MArcus vacated. Whose your OLB now? Next you cut Springs, fine. That totals about 10M in new cap room. But who is your #1 Corner now? It will take 10 Mil to get Haynesworth and pay the 4 draft picks. You need a little operating money through the season. What if JC or Portis goes down to season ending injury? You need a little scratch to pick up a free agent in those cases.

But that's just this years cap money! Sure they can clear cap for this year, that is part of the problem. To clear that money, you have to GUARANTEE future money for those guys. How many times have I heard people ask why we haven't released ARE yet? This is why. His contract was too long and too expensive to cut him without taking a huge cap hit. Now, as we get into the 2nd half of his contract, where maybe we could cut him soon and not take a huge hit, Snyder restructures his contract with guaranteed money. Now we'll have no choice but to keep him. Same thing with Jansen, Carter, Griffin, Samuels...

You also are way below what we'll have to pay Haynesworth. Because of the uncertainty of the CBA and the future possibility of a lockout top tier free agents like Haynesworth are not accepting back loaded contracts like Snyder uses. It will take UPFRONT money to land Haynesworth.



Like I said not only did they not guarantee future money, they actually shorten the contracts that they restructured and the only money that was GUARANTEED was part of their 2009 base salary.

You might want to check out the terms of those restuctured deals.


Okay, hmm, not what everyone else is reporting...

Griffin ...agreed to lower his 2009 number to $1.334 million while receiving more money up front in a bonus and having a few more seasons tacked on to the end of his deal, which now runs through 2014 (it was supposed to end next season).


Andre Carter and ARE
Each player had a deal set to expire after 2012, but each will now run through 2015.

:shock:

Okay, just today the NFL released that the cap unexpectedly jumped to 127M. With this new 4 MIL added today, we might have somewhere near the 10MIL in cap space, as noted by the Post today:

The Redskins still have one of the worst salary cap situations in the NFL. They could be roughly $10 million under the cap by restructuring a few more contracts and releasing a player such as veteran cornerback Shawn Springs


So where are you coming up with 14Mil?

1niksder wrote:Taylor won't be cut, Haynesworth wants $30M guarunteed and to be the highest paid defensive player in the NFL. The Skins will be about $14 million under the cap tonight. They can offer him a 6 year $100M deal with $40 million guaranteed yet it would only eat up about $6.5 million in 2009 cap space, Hall is looking for about $15 million guaranteed that's a five year $60M deal but only around $4 million in 2009 cap space, $2M for the rookie pool and they are still $1.5M under, cut Springs and gain another $6 million under the 2009 cap.


How do you get 6 Mil (2009 cap hit) from a 6 year, 100 Million contract? A 40MIL bonus over 6 years is 7MIL per year GUARANTEED, ALL BY ITSELF, without even accounting for the annual salary. Is Fat Albert going to agree to a league minimum salary which would make his 2009 cap hit 7MIL???

All that said, we haven't even addressed how we fill the rest of our roster spots. We still have plenty of holes to fill and/or players to re-sign. But there isn't enough cap room for Haynesworth and even half of these players given the amount of money Haynesworth demands and the maximum of 10MIL cap space we have. How do you pay for D. Hall, Springs, Taylor, Kendall, Montgomery, Golston, a replacement for #53, a kicker, a punter and 4 drafted rookies all with 10MIL? If you release some of these players to make more room, who do you replace e them with? for how much? If you think there is room, let's here some details, please, but you better bring the figures because so far, your math does not add up.

Here's someone else who agrees with me:
one longtime league official with knowledge of Washington's cap problems said yesterday that he could not envision any scenario, even with creative cap management, in which the Redskins could make a big offer to Haynesworth, bring back Hall and bolster the offensive line in free agency.


Is this guy wrong too? :shock:
Build through the draft!
Smithian
-----------
-----------
Posts: 2535
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Arkansas

Post by Smithian »

Have not been following Redskins too closely lately, but lets remember childrens and younguns that ever since the Chris Samuels / LaVar Arrington draft, people have been predicting cap hell for us. Since then, we have managed too be fine and sign big time free agents, for better or for worse. As much as they're maligned, Dan Snyder and Vinny Cerrato are smart guys and they have a bunch of very smart people around them who make more money than any of us on this board to figure this out.

If Dan Snyder, Vinny Cerrato, Jim Zorn, and gang decide they want Albert Haynesworth badly enough, they'll come up with the money if Haynesworth wants to come.
"I said when he retired that Joe Gibbs was the best coach I'd ever faced." - Bill Parcells
Gibbs4Life
G4L
G4L
Posts: 2363
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Location: no
Contact:

Post by Gibbs4Life »

The part of this that concerns me is the media, the more they go one way the more likely it is things go differently. I hope we sign the big guy.
HAIL
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

fleetus wrote:
Okay, hmm, not what everyone else is reporting...

Griffin ...agreed to lower his 2009 number to $1.334 million while receiving more money up front in a bonus and having a few more seasons tacked on to the end of his deal, which now runs through 2014 (it was supposed to end next season).


I haven't seen/heard the details of Griffin's new contract but as I said before I'm sure it will be structured like Carter and ARE's...



fleetus wrote:Andre Carter and ARE
Each player had a deal set to expire after 2012, but each will now run through 2015.

:shock:

The Redskins will have to pick a $7,250,000 bonus before the start of the 2010 season if they don't Carter will be a URFA after 2010. Randle El's option bonus is $6,250,000. If they get cut after the 2009 season the dead money would be less than option bonus payouts


fleetus wrote:Okay, just today the NFL released that the cap unexpectedly jumped to 127M. With this new 4 MIL added today, we might have somewhere near the 10MIL in cap space, as noted by the Post today:

The Redskins still have one of the worst salary cap situations in the NFL. They could be roughly $10 million under the cap by restructuring a few more contracts and releasing a player such as veteran cornerback Shawn Springs


So where are you coming up with 14Mil?


You can say they have one of the worst salary cap situations in the NFL when 20 of 32 teams have $20M in cap space (as of last month), that's just someone that didn't feel like getting the real numbers

OK so they aren't $14,000,000 under the cap :twisted: Also the Redskins had a $1,063,000 adjustment from LTBE bonuses that Tyson Smith didn't hit. The Redskins actually started with a cap number of $128,063,000. When I posted earlier I stated that part of the money would be used for our RFA.

Golston, Montgomery and Suisham each received $1M tenders, Griff saying will more than likely be about $2,866,000 and not the $3M that is being reported


fleetus wrote:
1niksder wrote:Taylor won't be cut, Haynesworth wants $30M guaranteed and to be the highest paid defensive player in the NFL. The Skins will be about $14 million under the cap tonight. They can offer him a 6 year $100M deal with $40 million guaranteed yet it would only eat up about $6.5 million in 2009 cap space, Hall is looking for about $15 million guaranteed that's a five year $60M deal but only around $4 million in 2009 cap space, $2M for the rookie pool and they are still $1.5M under, cut Springs and gain another $6 million under the 2009 cap.


How do you get 6 Mil (2009 cap hit) from a 6 year, 100 Million contract? A 40MIL bonus over 6 years is 7MIL per year GUARANTEED, ALL BY ITSELF, without even accounting for the annual salary. Is Fat Albert going to agree to a league minimum salary which would make his 2009 cap hit 7MIL???

You obviously don't understand how the cap works when dealing with the breakdown of contract dollars. I was going to break down Randle-El's contract so you might get a understanding of how it works. But since you want me to make one up, it will be a lot easier for you to get it.

The total value of the contract is $100 million over six years, like every other player hitting the market tonight Haynesworth is looking for a fat payday, I hear he's hoping to get $30-$35M in guarantee money. I went with $40 million because "the Danny" always overspends on the opening night of free agency and Hayneworth will be under contract by this time tomorrow.

The only guaranteed money in a NFL player's contract is the signing bonus money, so we'll start with that. $40,000,000 is about what he'll get considering he is welling to take less. I'm sure "the Danny" could cut him that $40M check and not think twice. A few years back he got hook on the split bonus way of doing deals. Basically he'll give him $20M this year and guarantees the balance next year (even if he's not on the team). The $20 million that he gets now will start counting against the cap, but is spread out over five years, so that's $4M from the first half of the bonus. When I originally posted the $6M cap hit for 2009, I was thinking his base salary would be around $2 million the first year, but with salary increases limited to 130% because this is the final capped year, he'll probably get a base closer to$2.5 million in 2009. So his cap hit will be $6.5 million this year. Now 2010 will be a totally different story. There will be the same $4M cap hit for the prorated bonus money that he got when he signed the contract. He'll more than likely have roster bonus of about $3M in years two and three and that will go down to around $1,000,000 over the last three years. With the proration of the second have of the signing bonus kicking in he'd have cap hit of $11,8500,000 in 2010, but Haynesworth will collect $23M before the season starts and his base salary would be $3.25M at the most. Throw in $1.5 million in performance bonuses in the last four years of the deal that increase by 50% each year. You can include workout bonuses of the same amounts over the same time frame nd your right around $94M over six years. Put the last $6.4 in the back end of the contract because by year four if he is still hitting all of the incentives his cap hit will be around $17M and they'll re-work it anyway. :D

fleetus wrote:All that said, we haven't even addressed how we fill the rest of our roster spots. We still have plenty of holes to fill and/or players to re-sign. But there isn't enough cap room for Haynesworth and even half of these players given the amount of money Haynesworth demands and the maximum of 10MIL cap space we have. How do you pay for D. Hall, Springs, Taylor, Kendall, Montgomery, Golston, a replacement for #53, a kicker, a punter and 4 drafted rookies all with 10MIL? If you release some of these players to make more room, who do you replace e them with? for how much? If you think there is room, let's here some details, please, but you better bring the figures because so far, your math does not add up.

First of all free agency doesn't start until midnight, secondly Montgomery, Golston and Suisham have been tendered so if they leave we'll get draft picks, third Springs and Taylor are under contract and are counted in my numbers if anything changes with them it will only add more cap space

fleetus wrote:Here's someone else who agrees with me:
one longtime league official with knowledge of Washington's cap problems said yesterday that he could not envision any scenario, even with creative cap management, in which the Redskins could make a big offer to Haynesworth, bring back Hall and bolster the offensive line in free agency.


Is this guy wrong too? :shock:

Sorry but I have to say he's wrong too, with three hours to go before the market opens the Skins have made tender offers to the player they want to retain, are still talking to Hall have start talks with DD and have $11.3M to play with and can still cut Springs if they Can get Hall to resign. Hall is looking for $15 million in guaranteed money and at most will cost $4.5 million in 2009, Yeah this guy is wrong too.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

Great Strategic Mistakes in History:

Hitler Invades Russia

MacArthur misreads the Chinese in Korea

Saddam Invades Kuwait

Fleetus calls out Niksder on the Cap.


Not pretty. Not pretty at all.

:wink:
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
prinzeofmoval
newbie
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:07 am

Post by prinzeofmoval »

vwoodzpusha wrote:I think this would be an awful move for us. I know we need some help in the middle but the amount of money that Haynesworth is going to get is going to kill us cap-wise.


okay i dont get you guys. Ya'll cry throughout the year because of the o-line and d-line problems and now that we're in position to land the biggest name we retract? look with him in the middle that would only help us against Barber, Westbrook and Jacobs. He made no named d-line players in Tennessee look great. He's a steal even for a 100 mil
Give me Liberty or Give me Colt
User avatar
fleetus
Hog
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 9:50 am
Location: Charlottesville, Va.

Post by fleetus »

Countertrey wrote:Great Strategic Mistakes in History:

Hitler Invades Russia

MacArthur misreads the Chinese in Korea

Saddam Invades Kuwait

Fleetus calls out Niksder on the Cap.


Not pretty. Not pretty at all.

:wink:


Sorry, but he was being vague and arrogant. the two don't mix well. Now that I've got him to give some specifics, we'll see how free agency plays out and how close to the truth he is. A Haynesworth signing will be a mistake either way.
Build through the draft!
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

Redskins GM Vinny Cerrato told an agent early Friday that Washington is no longer in the running for free agent Albert Haynesworth.
SI.com's Peter King says Cerrato has deemed Haynesworth "too expensive." Instead, Washington will likely try to get Chris Canty under contract pronto.

-----

Gotta say, I like what the front office is doing here. They're not overextending for Haynesworth and even though they doled out the money for DeAngelo Hall, it wasn't nearly as much as the 70 million contract he signed last time.

Seems reasonable for someone of his skill level.
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
cleg
cleg
cleg
Posts: 2649
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Deep in the Heart of Giants Territory

Post by cleg »

PFT states Albert is a Skin with a 100 million contract & 41 mil guarnteed. I honestly don't know how to feel about this.
Drinking the Kool-Aid again...
User avatar
fleetus
Hog
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 9:50 am
Location: Charlottesville, Va.

Post by fleetus »

I haven't heard any "official" word. But here's this from the same PFT article you must have read:

As we’ve previously said, the fact that the Titans and the Lions weren’t major players in the pursuit of Haynesworth tells us all we need to know; both teams have decided that Haynesworth isn’t worth the money.

Otherwise, the team with which Haynesworth spent seven seasons or his former defensive coordinator (who now is the head coach in Detroit) would have stepped up to the plate.


Let's hope it didn't happen. Otherwise we have become Raiders East with Al Davis Snyder as the owner. You know, that sort of "one screw loose" owner who inexplicably makes ridiculous decisions and throws way too much money around but never sees team improvement as a result.
Build through the draft!
User avatar
fleetus
Hog
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 9:50 am
Location: Charlottesville, Va.

Post by fleetus »

1Niksder, I have to admit, you were right. We had the cap room for both Hall and Haynesworth. I don't like the crazy money being tied up in a guy with as many obvious questions marks as Haynesworth, but just wanted to man up and say, you were right. :hail:
Build through the draft!
Post Reply