Obama reverses Bush abortion-funds policy

Wanna talk about politics, your favorite hockey team... vegetarian recipes?
Post Reply
Cappster
cappster
cappster
Posts: 3014
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:25 am
Location: Humanist, at your service.

Obama reverses Bush abortion-funds policy

Post by Cappster »


WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama on Friday struck down the Bush administration's ban on giving federal money to international groups that perform abortions or provide abortion information — an inflammatory policy that has bounced in and out of law for the past quarter-century.

Obama's move, the latest in an aggressive first week reversing contentious Bush policies, was warmly welcomed by liberal groups and denounced by abortion rights foes.

The ban has been a political football between Democratic and Republican administrations since GOP President Ronald Reagan first adopted it 1984. Democrat Bill Clinton ended the ban in 1993, but Republican George W. Bush re-instituted it in 2001 as one of his first acts in office.

"For too long, international family planning assistance has been used as a political wedge issue, the subject of a back and forth debate that has served only to divide us," Obama said in a statement released by the White House. "I have no desire to continue this stale and fruitless debate."

He said the ban was unnecessarily broad and undermined family planning in developing countries.

"In the coming weeks, my administration will initiate a fresh conversation on family planning, working to find areas of common ground to best meet the needs of women and families at home and around the world," the president said.

Obama issued the presidential memorandum rescinding the Bush policy without coverage by the media, late Friday afternoon. The abortion measure is a highly emotional one for many people, and the quiet signing was in contrast to the televised coverage of Obama's announcement Wednesday on ethics rules and Thursday's signing of orders on closing the Guantanamo Bay prison camp and banning torture in the questioning of terror suspects.

His action came one day after the 36th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion.

The Bush policy had banned U.S. taxpayer money, usually in the form of Agency for International Development funds, from going to international family planning groups that either offer abortions or provide information, counseling or referrals about abortion as a family planning method.

Critics have long held that the rule unfairly discriminates against the world's poor by denying U.S. aid to groups that may be involved in abortion but also work on other aspects of reproductive health care and HIV/AIDS, leading to the closure of free and low-cost rural clinics.

Supporters of the ban say that the United States still provides millions of dollars in family planning assistance around the world and that the rule prevents anti-abortion taxpayers from backing something they believe is morally wrong.

The ban has been known as the "Mexico City policy" for the city a U.S. delegation first announced it at a U.N. International Conference on Population.

Both Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who will oversee foreign aid, had promised to do away with the rule during the presidential campaign.

Clinton said Friday evening that for seven years Bush's policy made it more difficult for women around the world to gain access to essential information and health care services. "Rather than limiting women's ability to receive reproductive health services, we should be supporting programs that help women and their partners make decisions to ensure their health and the health of their families," Clinton said.

In a related move, Obama also said he would restore funding to the U.N. Population Fund (UNFPA). Both he and Clinton had pledged to reverse a Bush administration determination that assistance to the organization violated U.S. law known as the Kemp-Kasten amendment.

Obama, in his statement, said he looked forward to working with Congress to fulfill that promise: "By resuming funding to UNFPA, the U.S. will be joining 180 other donor nations working collaboratively to reduce poverty, improve the health of women and children, prevent HIV/AIDS and provide family planning assistance to women in 154 countries."

Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, executive director of the U.N. Population Fund, said: "The president's actions send a strong message about his leadership and his desire to support causes that will promote peace and dignity, equality for women and girls and economic development in the poorest regions of the world."

"We are confident that under the new president's direction, the U.S. will resume its leadership in promoting and protecting women's reproductive health and rights worldwide," Obaid said in a statement issued at U.N. headquarters in New York.

The Bush administration had barred U.S. money from the fund, contending that its work in China supported a Chinese family planning policy of coercive abortion and involuntary sterilization. UNFPA has vehemently denied that it does.

Congress had appropriated $40 million to the UNFPA in the past budget year, but the administration had withheld the money as it had done every year since 2002.

Organizations and lawmakers that had pressed Obama to rescind the Mexico City policy were jubilant.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the move "will help save lives and empower the poorest women and families to improve their quality of life and their future."

"Today's announcement is a very powerful signal to our neighbors around the world that the United States is once again back in the business of good public policy and ideology no longer blunts our ability to save lives around the globe," said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Population Action International, an advocacy group, said that the policy had "severely impacted" women's health and that the step "will help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies, abortions and women dying from high-risk pregnancies because they don't have access to family planning."

Anti-abortion groups and lawmakers condemned Obama's decision.

"I have long supported the Mexico City Policy and believe this administration's decision to be counter to our nation's interests," said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

"Coming just one day after the 36th anniversary of the tragic Roe v. Wade decision, this presidential directive forces taxpayers to subsidize abortions overseas — something no American should be required by government to do," said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.

Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., called it "morally wrong to take the taxpayer dollars of millions of pro-life Americans to promote abortion around the world."

"President Obama not long ago told the American people that he would support policies to reduce abortions, but today he is effectively guaranteeing more abortions by funding groups that promote abortion as a method of population control," said Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee.

___

AP White House Correspondent Jennifer Loven contributed to this report.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090124/ap_ ... ortion_ban

Its been a busy week for Obama. He had a big 160 million dollar party, is closing Guantanamo, and is making it easier for other countries to kill their babies on our dime. I believe that "family planning" should be using pre-egg meets sperm kinds of birth control aka birth control pills and condoms.

For the record, I don't mind the closing of Guantanamo Bay as nobody should be held without charges.
Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 280x, FTW!

Hog Bowl II Champion (2010)
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

This is a tricky issue for me. I'm pro-abortion but anti-government spending. No, I don't mean pro-choice, I'm pro-abortion. I think we should counsel people to get them. If it would work the world is better off for the decision. I still have the libertarian thing about government spending when abortions and pro-abortion counseling should be privately funded though.
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
HEROHAMO
|||
|||
Posts: 4752
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:34 am
Location: SANTA ANA,CA
Contact:

Post by HEROHAMO »

Honestly I feel the administrations main focus should be the Economy. They should take more time to think about the abortion issue before making such a ban.

I just hope they get rid of the My team vs there team mentality. Dems vs Reps. Do what is right for the Country.

I really hope he governs more from the middle rather than from the far left.
Sean Taylor starting free safety Heavens team!

21 Forever

"The show must go on."
User avatar
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~
Posts: 8496
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Post by REDEEMEDSKIN »

HEROHAMO wrote:I really hope he governs more from the middle rather than from the far left.


...um, too late. (Did you read the title of the thread?)
Back and better than ever!
User avatar
JeanPassepartout1974
swine
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Seymour TN

Post by JeanPassepartout1974 »

I am, anti-abortion unless, it is endangered to a woman's life!
Obama needs to really focus on the economy, first and foremost.
Have a great spring 2009!
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

I believe our money should stay home. As soon as it's "international," then it should be scrutinized harshly. Contrary to how we've done things, we shouldn't be the world police. Let the U.N. do the policing, and let the U.S. handle U.S. issues. Keep our money home.
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
**LPJ**
Posts: 6714
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
Contact:

Post by langleyparkjoe »

VetSkinsFan wrote:I believe our money should stay home. As soon as it's "international," then it should be scrutinized harshly. Contrary to how we've done things, we shouldn't be the world police. Let the U.N. do the policing, and let the U.S. handle U.S. issues. Keep our money home.


:up:

Can't we just send out a bunch of condoms and say "hey, this is it buddy, use um because Americans are fed up of the nonsense, we need our money"
Hog Bowl Champions
'09 & '17 langleyparkjoe, '10 Cappster, '11 & '13 DarthMonk,
'12 Deadskins, '14 PickSixerTWSS, '15 APEX PREDATOR, '16 vwoodzpusha
User avatar
JeanPassepartout1974
swine
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Seymour TN

Post by JeanPassepartout1974 »

Obama seems to be, reversing a lot of things, come to think of it!
Have a great spring 2009!
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

langleyparkjoe wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:I believe our money should stay home. As soon as it's "international," then it should be scrutinized harshly. Contrary to how we've done things, we shouldn't be the world police. Let the U.N. do the policing, and let the U.S. handle U.S. issues. Keep our money home.


:up:

Can't we just send out a bunch of condoms and say "hey, this is it buddy, use um because Americans are fed up of the nonsense, we need our money"


No, we'd still be financing the condoms.
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
Post Reply