Official Game Thread Ravens vs Redskins

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:19 am

DT11 twisted somnething there. Another chance for MK12 now.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:19 am

Sir_Monk wrote:
Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

SlkyCaramel · Post by **SlkyCaramel** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:19 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
SlkyCaramel wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
SlkyCaramel wrote:Here we go, the defense does it again.....they always give at the end.

Oh another retarded comment about the defense.

Why does it matter if our defense sucks when we can't score enough point to even use our defense?

Because this is a team game, contrary to popular belief. Just because the offense does not play well, the defense does not get a pass from me to play terribly.

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:19 am

JC sure has one hopped some tonight, huh?

Sir_Monk · Post by **Sir_Monk** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:20 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Sir_Monk wrote:
Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

I'm thinking 8-8.

VetSkinsFan · Post by **VetSkinsFan** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:20 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Sir_Monk wrote:
Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:21 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Sir_Monk wrote:
Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Isn't that where all of the "experts" predicted we would finish?

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:21 am

VetSkinsFan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Sir_Monk wrote:
Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

Maybe Chris is getting soft? C'mon, CLL! Man up!

spudstr04 · Post by **spudstr04** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:22 am

VetSkinsFan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Sir_Monk wrote:
Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

SF just beat NYJ

I think we can beat them, but 9-7 isn't getting us anywhere

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:22 am

VetSkinsFan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Sir_Monk wrote:
Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

SF is no longer a given.

spudstr04 · Post by **spudstr04** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:23 am

jason campbell false start...great leader

Sir_Monk · Post by **Sir_Monk** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:23 am

i don't think I have ever seen a false start penalty on a qb

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:23 am

Countertrey wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Sir_Monk wrote:
Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

Maybe Chris is getting soft? C'mon, CLL! Man up!

Yeah, I think we're going to win all the rest of our games and stroll into the playoffs. :lol:

Yeah.

Does that make yall feel better?

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:24 am

Everyone can go to bed now. Ed Reed got it started and he now put the final touch on it.

tribeofjudah · Post by **tribeofjudah** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:24 am

PATHETIC......WE SUCK

SlkyCaramel · Post by **SlkyCaramel** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:24 am

Come on

ey, fight for that ball.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:24 am

VetSkinsFan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Sir_Monk wrote:
Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

Think we can put up more than 10 points against them?

spudstr04 · Post by **spudstr04** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:24 am

wouldn't that be a fumble recovery? Ed Reed wasn't downed by a skin and randle el grabbed the ball.

Sir_Monk · Post by **Sir_Monk** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:24 am

The Skins remind me of the Lions last season.

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:25 am

We are now officially in free fall.

spudstr04 · Post by **spudstr04** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:25 am

Sir_Monk wrote:The Skins remind me of the Lions last season.

that's actually a good assessment.

JCaptMorgan12 · Post by **JCaptMorgan12** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:25 am

spudstr04 wrote:wouldn't that be a fumble recovery? Ed Reed wasn't downed by a skin and randle el grabbed the ball.

yeah, what is the rule there??

VetSkinsFan · Post by **VetSkinsFan** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:25 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Sir_Monk wrote:
Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

Think we can put up more than 10 points against them?

I think we can beat 1 of 'em. 1/3 gives us .500, which is still acceptable for a 1st year yead coach IMO.

hector234 · Post by **hector234** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:26 am

If Portis is healthy, the offense looks a whoe lot better

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:26 am

Can someone explain why that wasn't considered a fumble by Reed? He was not down by contact. The only player who can give himself up by sliding is the QB. When he slid, and held the ball up, that should have still been a live play until he was touched by a Redskin. Randal El plucked the ball from his hand. Why was that not a change of possession?