Greg Blache article

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
Cappster
cappster
cappster
Posts: 3014
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:25 am
Location: Humanist, at your service.

Greg Blache article

Post by Cappster »

In the last four seasons, Greg Blache opted for a low profile as a Redskins assistant coach. He rarely talked to media, by his own choosing.

Now that he heads up the Redskins' defense, replacing Gregg Williams, Blache takes on a higher profile.

What will Redskins fans learn about Blache in the coming year?

For one, he's not one to mince words. He tells it like it is.

He won't recount statistics to prove a point. He doesn't care about a defense's ranking against the run or pass.

He calls his brand of defense "hard-nosed football." He wants tough, physical, hard-hitting players.

Simply put, he looks at a football game and prepares his players for a fight.

In an interview shortly after the Redskins hired Jim Zorn as head coach, Blache would not label himself or put himself in any category of defensive coordinators.

Asked if he would be as aggressive on defense as his predecessor, Blache said: "When a situation presents itself, you make decisions and you go with it. So if there's more blitzing or less blitzing, I can't answer that to you right now.

"I look at winning a series and winning a football game. Whatever I have to do, I'm going to do it to win that series and win that football game. Some weeks there may be more blitzing, some weeks there may be more zone.

"It depends on the opponent, it depends on the health of our football team, and it depends on matchups."

Blache said he does not expect to revamp or alter the Redskins' defensive approach.

Under Williams, who is now the defensive coordinator of the Jacksonville Jaguars, the Redskins finished last season ranked eighth in total defense, fourth against the run and 16th against the pass.

"There's no need to change," he said. "We were a very good defensive unit the last four years. There are some areas we need to clean up, but that's not about scheme. That's us doing a better job.

"We have a good scheme. We have some good packages. We're going to stick with the system that matches our players. I see no reason to change."

Blache does put a premium on cornerback play in his defense.

"When you blitz, somebody has to cover those wide outs," he said. "When you put them in one-on-one matchups, you always have to be careful."

The Redskins have veterans Shawn Springs and Fred Smoot on the roster, but fourth-year player Carlos Rogers is coming off a knee ligament injury. That's one reason why the team has targeted cornerback as a need this offseason.

Springs was among the first players Blache called after he was hired to lead the Redskins in 2008.

Springs is coming off a strong season in which he had four interceptions in the Redskins' last four games--all wins. Even though Springs turns 33 years old on March 11, he is regarded as an elite-level cornerback.

"I talked to Shawn, Cornelius [Griffin] and Fletch--some of the key guys--and I let them know what my thoughts were about them," Blache said. "I have great respect for Shawn Springs. He had one of the best seasons of his career, with how he played down the stretch in the last few weeks. He played as good as any corner in the league."

Blache served primarily as the Redskins' defensive line coach the last four years under Williams. He helped develop youngsters Anthony Montgomery, Kedric Golston and Chris Wilson in recent seasons.

Before joining the Redskins, Blache was a defensive coordinator in Chicago, where he led the Bears to several top 10 rankings in five seasons.

What kind of coordinator is he?

"I'mvery hands-off," he said. "I let my [assistants] coach their guys. I don't watch drills cloesely. I stay back away from them. The hardest thing for me will be standing back and not putting my two cents in with the defensive line drills.

"One thing I know, when I have a job to do, I like people to get out of my way and let me do it."

The Redskins return all their defensive starters from last season, but coaches and team officials have targeted defensive line and safety--along with cornerback--as needs this offseason.

Blache also sees a need for depth at all positions on defense.

"If you go across the board, in the NFL, you have to have quality depth," he said. "So we have to take our team, see what's available, what best fits us, and then go from there."


http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=34725

I like Blache. He just looks like a football coach through and through. I like the fact, in a land of politics, he gives it straight out of the bottle. I believe our defense will be better this year than last. Blache doesn't seem to have the ego associated with Williams rather he seems to have a "blue collar" type attitude. Top 5 defense this year. Enough said!

Image
Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 280x, FTW!

Hog Bowl II Champion (2010)
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

Top 5 defense this year.


Not with our current defensive line.

Before joining the Redskins, Blache was a defensive coordinator in Chicago, where he led the Bears to several top 10 rankings in five seasons.


I don't know where Redskins.com gets their statistics from but in Chicago Balche's defenses were ranked 29th, 16th, 15th, 25th, and 14th in yards per game.
Suck and Luck
Cappster
cappster
cappster
Posts: 3014
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:25 am
Location: Humanist, at your service.

Post by Cappster »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
Top 5 defense this year.


Not with our current defensive line.

Before joining the Redskins, Blache was a defensive coordinator in Chicago, where he led the Bears to several top 10 rankings in five seasons.


I don't know where Redskins.com gets their statistics from but in Chicago Balche's defenses were ranked 29th, 16th, 15th, 25th, and 14th in yards per game.


Yes, our defensive line is good enough for top 5 this year (in rushing yds allowed) so our corners need to be good enough for 10th or better in defense which = top 5 defense overall. Sip on the POSITIVE JUICE.
Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 280x, FTW!

Hog Bowl II Champion (2010)
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

Yes, our defensive line is good enough for top 5 this year (in rushing yds allowed) so our corners need to be good enough for 10th or better in defense which = top 5 defense overall. Sip on the POSITIVE JUICE.


And pressure on the qb is going to come from where?
Suck and Luck
PulpExposure
Pushing Paper
Pushing Paper
Posts: 4860
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:01 pm

Post by PulpExposure »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
Top 5 defense this year.


Not with our current defensive line.

Before joining the Redskins, Blache was a defensive coordinator in Chicago, where he led the Bears to several top 10 rankings in five seasons.


I don't know where Redskins.com gets their statistics from but in Chicago Balche's defenses were ranked 29th, 16th, 15th, 25th, and 14th in yards per game.


Well, they did one year rank 1st in points allowed (12.7 points per game), which is really the ultimate defensive statistic. That's pretty impressive. Though yeah, no idea where that false statement with respect to multiple top 10 rankings came from...
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

CanesSkins26 wrote:And pressure on the qb is going to come from where?


I agree to some degree, but again, sacks are not the only statistic. Last year the D ranked 4th against the run. The line did their job in that regard. They ranked 16th in pass defense. An average ranking, but the d-line are not the only components to make up that ranking. Those numbers combined indicate our d-line is better than average. The addition of a DE and possibly a DT will make them even better. So Cappster's prediction of a top five defense is not that far fetched.
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

SkinsFreak wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:And pressure on the qb is going to come from where?


I agree to some degree, but again, sacks are not the only statistic. Last year the D ranked 4th against the run. The line did their job in that regard. They ranked 16th in pass defense. An average ranking, but the d-line are not the only components to make up that ranking. Those numbers combined indicate our d-line is better than average. The addition of a DE and possibly a DT will make them even better. So Cappster's prediction of a top five defense is not that far fetched.


Oh I have no problem with their play against the run. It's against the pass that we have problems. And I think that in terms of pressuring the qb we have one of the worst lines in the NFL. There were far too many games last year when opposing qb's had way too much time to sit in the pocket and throw the ball. If you look at the playoff teams from this season one of the common factors among most of the teams was an ability to get after the qb. I don't care how good the secondary is if you can't rush the passer. No secondary can cover forever.
Suck and Luck
Cappster
cappster
cappster
Posts: 3014
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:25 am
Location: Humanist, at your service.

Post by Cappster »

I agree we need a play maker on the defensive line, but sacks don't tell the whole story. I would be happy with consistent pressure on the QB. I heard a stat that said something to the effect there are 1500 - 1700 defensive plays a year. If a guy gets 10-15 sacks that year, what is he doing the rest of the time? Sacks get hyped up more than just about any other stat in the NFL. Sacks are a good thing , but they aren't the only thing.

On a side note, I would like to see Chris Wilson get better against the run so he can be more than just a third down specialist.
Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 280x, FTW!

Hog Bowl II Champion (2010)
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

I do know one thing, no matter how bad any defense was last year OR how great any defense was last year, that information has absolutely NOTHING to do with how good or bad the defense will be this season.

That is only an indication - but it means NOTHING!

Last year in game 1 we were told that we were in for a tough game against the Miami defense. Not because they were good in pre season of 2007 BUT because they were "top 5, total defense in 2006" woopee! - then that team almost lost every game - give me a break!

I think this defense, this year will be a very good defense because this guy will find the players to play well for him.

Baseball and other sports depend on the past the NFL is about the now - NOTHING that happened last year means anything this year except maybe to someone playing an electronic version of the NFL :lol:
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
PeetyPa
piglet
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:56 pm

Couple of points

Post by PeetyPa »

First of all, I think we,as fans, grabb to what we saw , picked out the good things and get excited about. I think we all know that what the Redkins did last season in Defense means nothing now. However, it tells us that we have the players to make an impact in D. We may not have a good D-line, but if it wasn't for tragery of Sean(rest in peace), we would have the best secondary in the NFL. I mean, give credit where is due, Vinny and Dan!). I mean, no team can have the best players on all sides of the ball. Now, I think the Redkins are going to start getting players to re-enforce our D*line and hopefully get better.
Second and last, if we get D'angelo Hall...we can still be the best secodary in the NFL...all we have to do is get a physical Safety to help with the run.
Also, I cant wait for draft day, I am sure the our Redkins will pick a D-line that can help us.. Personnaly, I dont like Campbell from the U, I would rather take a tackle becausa I think at 21..the talent is better at that position.
User avatar
PeetyPa
piglet
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:56 pm

Post by PeetyPa »

by the way, I heard on Comcast about the Redkins being interested in D Hall
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

SkinsJock wrote:I do know one thing, no matter how bad any defense was last year OR how great any defense was last year, that information has absolutely NOTHING to do with how good or bad the defense will be this season.

That is only an indication - but it means NOTHING!

Last year in game 1 we were told that we were in for a tough game against the Miami defense. Not because they were good in pre season of 2007 BUT because they were "top 5, total defense in 2006" woopee! - then that team almost lost every game - give me a break!

I think this defense, this year will be a very good defense because this guy will find the players to play well for him.

Baseball and other sports depend on the past the NFL is about the now - NOTHING that happened last year means anything this year except maybe to someone playing an electronic version of the NFL :lol:


While past performance is no guarantee of future performance, it is usually a reasonable indicator. It means a lot but not everything.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

yupchagee wrote:..While past performance is no guarantee of future performance, it is usually a reasonable indicator. It means a lot but not everything.


I agree, I was just venting a little - I get a little tired of people pointing to past stats or indicators and placing too much importance IMO on these.

I really think that given the same players that this guy has and the lack of changes, PLUS hopefully adding some guys to the mix, we should see a defensive unit that has something to prove. I like the fact that Blache sounds like a no excuses, kind of guy.

From what we've heard this guy sounds like Bugel on the defensive side of the ball.
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Re: Couple of points

Post by CanesSkins26 »

PeetyPa wrote:First of all, I think we,as fans, grabb to what we saw , picked out the good things and get excited about. I think we all know that what the Redkins did last season in Defense means nothing now. However, it tells us that we have the players to make an impact in D. We may not have a good D-line, but if it wasn't for tragery of Sean(rest in peace), we would have the best secondary in the NFL. I mean, give credit where is due, Vinny and Dan!). I mean, no team can have the best players on all sides of the ball. Now, I think the Redkins are going to start getting players to re-enforce our D*line and hopefully get better.
Second and last, if we get D'angelo Hall...we can still be the best secodary in the NFL...all we have to do is get a physical Safety to help with the run.
Also, I cant wait for draft day, I am sure the our Redkins will pick a D-line that can help us.. Personnaly, I dont like Campbell from the U, I would rather take a tackle becausa I think at 21..the talent is better at that position.


Having a great secondary is good and all, but it doesn't mean much if you can't pressure the quarterback. Especially with the rules the way that they are, it's very difficult to have a "shut down" corner anymore. And with the NFL becoming more of a passing league, you have to be able to get after the quarterback and make him uncomfortable in the pocket. With our defensive line the way it is we simply aren't able to do that on a consistent basis.
Suck and Luck
User avatar
PeetyPa
piglet
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:56 pm

Post by PeetyPa »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
PeetyPa wrote:First of all, I think we,as fans, grabb to what we saw , picked out the good things and get excited about. I think we all know that what the Redkins did last season in Defense means nothing now. However, it tells us that we have the players to make an impact in D. We may not have a good D-line, but if it wasn't for tragery of Sean(rest in peace), we would have the best secondary in the NFL. I mean, give credit where is due, Vinny and Dan!). I mean, no team can have the best players on all sides of the ball. Now, I think the Redkins are going to start getting players to re-enforce our D*line and hopefully get better.
Second and last, if we get D'angelo Hall...we can still be the best secodary in the NFL...all we have to do is get a physical Safety to help with the run.
Also, I cant wait for draft day, I am sure the our Redkins will pick a D-line that can help us.. Personnaly, I dont like Campbell from the U, I would rather take a tackle becausa I think at 21..the talent is better at that position.


Having a great secondary is good and all, but it doesn't mean much if you can't pressure the quarterback. Especially with the rules the way that they are, it's very difficult to have a "shut down" corner anymore. And with the NFL becoming more of a passing league, you have to be able to get after the quarterback and make him uncomfortable in the pocket. With our defensive line the way it is we simply aren't able to do that on a consistent basis.
I understnad that we cant push preasure on the QB in a consitent manner. But my point is that if we did not have such as good secondary, we would have given a lot more touchdowns last season, don't you think ?
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

Man, the linebackers never get any love. Sacks, pressure, coverage... they do it all.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

SkinsFreak wrote:Man, the linebackers never get any love. Sacks, pressure, coverage... they do it all.

I agree SkinsFreak but I also understand where Caneskins is coming from.

Really we need all 3, the line, the backers and the secondary to be in sync BUT the secondary under todays rules favoring the pass catchers is a tough job if the line is not getting pressure OR occupying the blockers so someone can get the QB to get rid of the ball before he wants to OR to have the QB throw to a check down receiver rather than who the play was designed to go to.

We need to have good CBs and good safeties, YES :lol: BUT we also need to have much better pressure from our down lineman than we have seen recently - the other thing is we need better depth along the line because you need these big guys to be going at it strong in the 4th qtr when your team is hopefully in front and the other team is trying to pass against a rush that is still there and not "resting" on the sidelines. I noticed Strahan on the sidelines a lot during the playoffs BUT there was someone fresh in there keeping up the pressure.
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Post Reply