Players that are re-working deals...

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Re: Players that are re-working deals...

Post by VetSkinsFan »

mastdark81 wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
chiefhog44 wrote:
spudstr04 wrote:
The Redskins recently re-worked the contracts of WR Antwaan Randle El, RG Randy Thomas, and DE Andre Carter.

The Thomas and Carter restructurings were expected. Randle El's 2008 cap number dropped from $4.1 million to $2.7 million, and he had an extra year added onto his deal. ARE caught a career high 51 passes for 728 yards (14.3 YPC) in 2007, but scored only once. He'd preferably move to the slot in 2008, although the Redskins first need to find a viable replacement outside.


http://www.rotoworld.com
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/2008/02/all_quiet_on_coaching_frontfun.html?nav=rss_blog



ARE should be paying us to play!


A lot of us rip on Lloyd for not producing, but ARE hasn't exactly been a great addition, especially considering how much we paid for him. As a punter returner he has been mediocre and as a receiver he isn't anything more than a slot receiver.


I wouldn't quite rip on ARE for his numbers as a WR. He's done pretty well considered he's been hurt. He's always looking for YAC, which is admirable to say the least. I watched Randy Moss in the SB fall down when he was taking an inside route that I don't think I would have seen ARE fall down on. I like 'em.

Now, if we could just get him to stop tap dancing on punt returns......


Well I disagree, I always felt that he was not a good runner after the catch, same with his punt returns always stopping or hopping or falling to the ground when he could just reach higher or reach lower. Maybe i'm wrong, it could have been the timing and accuracy of Jason's passes. But this guy always falling to the ground after a catch without being touched.

With that said he played decent for us last year and made some key plays.



JC's passes were hard and off target a lot. The way I remember it, though, is that ARE was the one always looking upfield after the catch for yards. There were a few questionable judgment calls, but I like his heart and drive after the catch.
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
chiefhog44
**ch44
**ch44
Posts: 2444
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: Chicago

Post by chiefhog44 »

SkinsFreak wrote:
chiefhog44 wrote:What's your point?


My point was to agree with Canes comment regarding frustration over ARE's dancing on punt returns. Problem with that? And I personally don't care how much money the guy makes, I don't sign his checks. And as I said, his contact was back loaded to begin with and they just restructured him accordingly.


good point...I don't like that either. but you should care aout how much he is making because his contract is one of the reasons we're in cap trouble this year...even after his restructuring.

You can't cut the guy, I'm not saying that...never did actually. Just upset about another bone headed signing.
Miss you 21

12/17/09 - Ding Dong the Witch is Dead...Which Old Witch? The Wicked Witch.

1/6/10 - The start of another dark era
spudstr04
spudstr04
spudstr04
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:13 am
Location: NC

Post by spudstr04 »

Redskins restructured Chris Cooley's contract, lowering his cap hit $7.8 million.

They converted a roster bonus into guaranteed money. This is an annual event for the Redskins as Dan Snyder's cash helps to soothe any cap problems for the 'Skins. Washington is still over the cap, but has many moves to go.



http://www.rotoworld.com
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7796664/
#21 = Forever in our hearts
User avatar
BnGhog
Hog
Posts: 1553
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:23 pm
Location: Danville VA

Post by BnGhog »

Great!

Was 16 mill over cap, minus 7.8 mill

We only have 8.2 million to break even with cap.

If we plan on getting any FAs, we need to drop off somthing like 16 more million.
I firmly believe the Patriots are the antichrist.
por-tiz2skins
Hog
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 11:12 pm

Cooley helps out Cap

Post by por-tiz2skins »

Link: http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/...-save-cap-space

'Skins rework Cooley deal to save cap space
FOXSports.com

Updated: February 14, 2008, 2:42 PM EST

The Washington Redskins received some salary cap relief Thursday by revamping the contract of tight end Chris Cooley.

FOXSports.com has learned Washington converted an $11 million roster bonus Cooley was scheduled to receive into guaranteed money. The move is believed to have lowered Cooley's 2008 cap number from a team-high $12.2 million to $4.4 million.

Other highly-paid Redskins are expected to accept restructured contracts as Washington works to get under the 2008 projected salary cap of $116 million by February 28. Reserve quarterback Mark Brunell ($6.5 million cap number) also is likely to get released.

The Redskins are currently $7 million over the cap, but that figure doesn't include calculations on contract clauses from 2007 like incentives that are still being finalized.

Washington has 15 players set to become unrestricted free agents highlighted by quarterback Todd Collins, who led Washington to a 3-1 record starting in place of the injured Jason Campbell.

------
Edit: Other salary cap updates from earlier Feb. 8 (per JLC)
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/reds...g_frontfun.html

"Anyway, for those interested in the minutia, the Redskins have reworked the contracts of 3 players thus far- Randy Thomas, Andre Carter and Antwaan Randle El, with at least a half dozen more to come. According to a source with knowledge of the situation, here's the breakdown:

Randy Thomas went from a cap figure of 8.0 million to 4.1
Andre Carter went from 4.9 to 2.8 (the team guaranteed his June 1 roster bonus of $2.4 million as part of the deal)
ARE went from 4.1 to 2.7

So the Redskins saved 7.6 mil in cap space with these moves."




Also ESPN Reports:Chad isn't going any where but if we have enough cap well be open to get WR's like Roy Williams-Larry fits-and more.
R.I.P

Sean Taylor-21#
Greatest safety ever and the most feared hardest hitting safety ever.

"I swear I'll Honor the number 21#"

-Clinton Portis
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Post by Irn-Bru »

They just re-did his deal this past year. Couldn't they have foreseen this? :hmm:


Ah, forget it. . .I'm not the cap expert. :?
User avatar
redskins_89
piggie
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: New Jersey

Post by redskins_89 »

I still think the redskins will get chad johnson trades always have 1 side would always deny trades. But Im shocked were already 7 mill away thats amazing.
por-tiz2skins
Hog
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 11:12 pm

Post by por-tiz2skins »

redskins_89 wrote:I still think the redskins will get chad johnson trades always have 1 side would always deny trades. But Im shocked were already 7 mill away thats amazing.
I know didn't release no one yet and where gonna restructure with others.............highprice FA this year any one?.

I also still see Chad Coming Marvin knows well try harder and harder to get him
R.I.P

Sean Taylor-21#
Greatest safety ever and the most feared hardest hitting safety ever.

"I swear I'll Honor the number 21#"

-Clinton Portis
lowtharofthehill
Hog
Posts: 275
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:26 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by lowtharofthehill »

Cooley didnt really restructure all that happened is that a bonus he was due is now just spread out over 5 years but he still gets the same amount of money and teh years stay the same. The Redskins do all of their big contracts the same way and they always just pay out the large amounts prorated over five years.
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

por-tiz2skins wrote:
redskins_89 wrote:I still think the redskins will get chad johnson trades always have 1 side would always deny trades. But Im shocked were already 7 mill away thats amazing.
I know didn't release no one yet and where gonna restructure with others.............highprice FA this year any one?.

I also still see Chad Coming Marvin knows well try harder and harder to get him


How much can we save by cutting Loyd?
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
UK Skins Fan
|||||||
|||||||
Posts: 4597
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:11 pm
Location: Somewhere, out there.

Post by UK Skins Fan »

yupchagee wrote:
por-tiz2skins wrote:
redskins_89 wrote:I still think the redskins will get chad johnson trades always have 1 side would always deny trades. But Im shocked were already 7 mill away thats amazing.
I know didn't release no one yet and where gonna restructure with others.............highprice FA this year any one?.

I also still see Chad Coming Marvin knows well try harder and harder to get him


How much can we save by cutting Loyd?
I read somewhere that that would save us $2.4m, although whether that would be before or after 1st June, I don't know.
Also available on Twitter @UKSkinsFan
User avatar
SKINFAN
Hog
Posts: 1659
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Sterling, Virginia

Post by SKINFAN »

Chad J. is a trade... Who are we giving up? I can't find anything about this.... Guys I think they'd want:

Cooley, Portis, Moss, Samuels, Marcus Wash, Smoot, Dre Carter


Who I think we can offer:

Thrash, Betts, Lloyd (comes w/ a free gift certificated for skins store), Khary Campbell, Pierson P.

Not all of these guys of course, but I'm sure they'd want 1 or 2 for Chad.
#21 (36) This IS and will always be the High watermark where all new DB's are measured.


Proverbs 27:17
Fios
The Evil Straw
The Evil Straw
Posts: 8135
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 2:30 pm
Location: Leather Chair
Contact:

Post by Fios »

1) Discussion of other team's free agents should be limited to the Fantasy Football Land forum
2) But, in an effort to kill this thing, and I pray this is the last time I have to type this: There is a ZERO% chance Chad Johnson will be playing for anyone other than the Bengals next year. They have said, repeatedly, they are NOT trading him.
RIP Sean Taylor
User avatar
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~
Posts: 8496
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Post by REDEEMEDSKIN »

In an effort to kill this thing, and while praying this would be the last time he'd have to type this, Fios wrote:...There is a ZERO% chance Chad Johnson will be playing for anyone other than the Bengals next year. They have said, repeatedly, they are NOT trading him.


I thought it was worth repeating...boldly. My 2 cents
Back and better than ever!
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
In an effort to kill this thing, and while praying this would be the last time he'd have to type this, Fios wrote:...There is a ZERO% chance Chad Johnson will be playing for anyone other than the Bengals next year. They have said, repeatedly, they are NOT trading him.


I thought it was worth repeating...boldly. My 2 cents


The problem is, it's in English... and I'm not sure that all can read it. I suspect that "what your definition of 'is' is" may also provide some room to quibble.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

Thanks for clearing that up TRO and Fios - so for those still interested in a C. Johnson trade it seems there is still a chance, albeit small, of a trade and we all know that Snyder likes to add players whose ONLY interest is financial and not in helping this team - so please continue to analyze this possibility - I just wish I had some of whatever y'all are using :lol:
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
LOSTHOG
Hog
Posts: 803
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:30 am
Location: NORTH CAROLINA

Post by LOSTHOG »

I just read on another board (a much less reliable one) that we just restructured Jon Jansen's contract. With that move and the void of MB04 and Rock Cartwright's contracts at the start of FA, we are down to just $700k over the projected cap. Can anyone verify this?
User avatar
Jake
Junior Hog
Junior Hog
Posts: 11253
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 4:18 am
Location: Mayo, Maryland
Contact:

Post by Jake »

Brunell's contract has been voided.

And they're under [David Elfin]


Quarterback Mark Brunell's contract was just voided, saving the Redskins $3.4 million against the salary cap and getting them under the $116 million limit more than 30 hours before the 11:59 PM Thursday deadline. This doesn't mean Brunell, 37, won't be back for a fourth season in Washington. But it does mean if he does return, it will be at a much more sensible price.


http://video1.washingtontimes.com/redskins/
RIP Sean Taylor 1983-2007
RIP Kevin Mitchell 1971-2007
RIP Justin Skaggs 1979-2007
RIP Sammy Baugh 1914-2008

RIP JPFair
RIP VetSkinsFan

#60 Chris Samuels: 6-time 6-time 6-time 6-time 6-time 6-time Pro Bowl left tackle!
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

Thanks Jake - good info and very timely, also for great restraint in not just starting a new thread :wink:
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

After Jon Jansen and Chris Samuels re-worked their contracts it took the Skins down to around $1.3mil. over the cap. Then they cut Lloyd (post June 1st, that's $4.2mil. that stays on the books until it drops to $1.8mil. in June, Mark cleared $3.4mil. meaning the Redskins have $2.2mil. to play with, until they sit down with CP, Moss and Washington
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
User avatar
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~
Posts: 8496
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Post by REDEEMEDSKIN »

Jake wrote:Brunell's contract has been voided.


Image

I think this is da big one...
Back and better than ever!
User avatar
fleetus
Hog
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 9:50 am
Location: Charlottesville, Va.

What is our Cap number?

Post by fleetus »

How did we go from 5+ mil over the cap last week to being under the cap and having enough to sign Collins today? Not to mention we will need money for draft picks. So what is our actual cap number and how did we clear all that space?
Build through the draft!
GSPODS
Hog
Posts: 4716
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:20 am

Post by GSPODS »

User avatar
LetsRollBurgundyNGold
piggie
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Trapped in Panther Land

Post by LetsRollBurgundyNGold »

SKINFAN wrote:Hey guys, is it normal for players to restructure contracts like this? I mean, it seems like it's required for our players to restructure because of all these "cap hell" years we are having... I remember how Springs was getting flak for not restructuring last year. It just seems like we have more players doing it than other teams that's all.


It all comes down to how much an owner is willing to come out of his pocket with the money right then and there. The player gets his money up front, and that amount gets knocked off the cap. It's like your boss saying, "Let me give you half your yearly salary up front instead of waiting on your paycheck. It smooths things over with the boys in accounting." Not a real sacrifice for the players.

Most teams in the league are unwilling to do this, because the owner is usually too cheap. That is one thing I give credit to this front office for, they work some serious 'cap magic'.
Two formation shifts, one man in motion, and a counter trey...those were the days...
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Re: What is our Cap number?

Post by 1niksder »

fleetus wrote:How did we go from 5+ mil over the cap last week to being under the cap and having enough to sign Collins today? Not to mention we will need money for draft picks. So what is our actual cap number and how did we clear all that space?


Players have been re-working contracts for the pass two weeks - still doing it in some cases, Moss just re-worked his deal and Collins will only cost $1.5M this year so the cap number is around $4M under.
Portis is rumored be working on a new deal now :shock:
He could free up another $3M or so.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Post Reply