A Few Ideas for the Pro Bowl

70Chip · Post by **70Chip** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:51 pm

I was talking to my bro 70chip and we came up with a few ideas:

1 NFC starts on defense with 10 men.

2 Cool

ey wears #21 (and plays defense for a play?)

3 League lets us put Landry in place of Taylor and he wears #21

Whaddaya think?

DarthMonk

MossIsBoss88 · Post by **MossIsBoss88** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:22 am

as cool as it sounds, the only thing that could possibly (and very well may) happen is #1. I feel like they may put 10 men on the field for the first play.

SkinsHead56 · Post by **SkinsHead56** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:53 am

I'm going with what C.P. said after breifly considering wearing 21.
"I can't be Sean, I can't play like Sean so I won't even try"

I personally don't want anyone else to wear #21 for the Redskins. Sean Taylor became my favorite player as soon as we drafted him and that was when LaVar was the reason I picked my screen name.

Jake · Post by **Jake** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:03 am

I think only #1 is feasible and I hope it actually happens.

skinsfan#33 · Post by **skinsfan#33** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:45 am

I have a probelm with the PB in general. Not the game or the fact that people make the squad all the time and don't deserve it. Case in point. Samuals and Roy Williams will have gone to five PBs each and Art Monk went to only three.

How many times did either of those two even deserve to go? Williams, maybe once, and Samuals, maybe twice. Monk should have gone four or five times.

The retarded HoF voters look at those PB #s to help decide who they select into the HoF. So does that mean Chris Samuals and Roy Williams are a better OT and Safety, than Monk was a WR?

No frakking way!

But those idiots that select the HoF players look at how many times a guy went.

But back on subject. The NFC starting with ten on defense would be cool!