Official Game Day Thread - Redskins at Bucs

tribeofjudah · Post by **tribeofjudah** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:55 pm

JC to

ey ............woooooohhooooo

joedondero1919 · Post by **joedondero1919** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:55 pm

Kruncher wrote:Let's see...timeout equals 3 yard pass that yields five and fourth down.

or a TD

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:55 pm

TV land, what's JC's injury look like?

CanesSkins26 · Post by **CanesSkins26** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:55 pm

Where is the genius that wanted JC benched in the first half? Like I said earlier, Cool

ey and JC are the only two that showed up to play today.

just654 · Post by **just654** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:55 pm

way to go

ey

frankcal20 · Post by **frankcal20** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:55 pm

time out not so stupid

wormer · Post by **wormer** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:55 pm

No flags???? What??? I guess the refs need to try and keep it close. Thanks refs.

Kruncher · Post by **Kruncher** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:56 pm

Are there any penalties? lol....Ok, just do that 3 more times now.

CanesSkins26 · Post by **CanesSkins26** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:56 pm

SCSkinsFan wrote:TV land, what's JC's injury look like?

He hurt his wrist in the first half and he took a helmet to the sternum a few plays ago.

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:56 pm

Must be pretty good. TD Cooooooooley!!!!!!!

We're back in it! Go Skins!

wormer · Post by **wormer** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:56 pm

OK. theres the flag. On the xtra point. I KNEW one was coming. :-)

))

Sir_Monk · Post by **Sir_Monk** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:56 pm

TV land, what's JC's injury look like?

I thought it was a late hit

Kruncher · Post by **Kruncher** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:56 pm

GO FOR 2 GIBBS lol

funsho2 · Post by **funsho2** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:56 pm

this is what i said ,,,we need to come out to score a td

CanesSkins26 · Post by **CanesSkins26** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:57 pm

welch wrote:
Stupid, jumbo one-receiver set. Get out of the 80's Gibbs.

Nonsense.

No it isn't. Twice on that drive we tried to throw out of a jumbo, one-receiver formation and both times there was nobody open. We spread out the defense and hit a long completion for a td.

joedondero1919 · Post by **joedondero1919** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:57 pm

you know, with half the distance to the goal, i would have liked to take that opportunity to go for two and get within 8. does anyone else agree? or would you just go for the safe 1, knowing a TD + FG = 1 point lead.

DaSkins24 · Post by **DaSkins24** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:57 pm

ey is a monster.

welch · Post by **welch** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:57 pm

Hail to the Redskins!

CanesSkins26 · Post by **CanesSkins26** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:58 pm

joedondero1919 wrote:you know, with half the distance to the goal, i would have liked to take that opportunity to go for two and get within 8. does anyone else agree? or would you just go for the safe 1, knowing a TD + FG = 1 point lead.

Way too early to go for two.

joedondero1919 · Post by **joedondero1919** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:58 pm

CanesSkins26 wrote:
joedondero1919 wrote:you know, with half the distance to the goal, i would have liked to take that opportunity to go for two and get within 8. does anyone else agree? or would you just go for the safe 1, knowing a TD + FG = 1 point lead.

Way too early to go for two.

i know, but if you are going to cut our distance by half, might not be a bad idea.

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:58 pm

joedondero1919 wrote:you know, with half the distance to the goal, i would have liked to take that opportunity to go for two and get within 8. does anyone else agree? or would you just go for the safe 1, knowing a TD + FG = 1 point lead.

Not yet.

Kruncher · Post by **Kruncher** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:59 pm

joedondero1919 wrote:you know, with half the distance to the goal, i would have liked to take that opportunity to go for two and get within 8. does anyone else agree? or would you just go for the safe 1, knowing a TD + FG = 1 point lead.

For now, get the points that you can on extra points. We are only a TD and FG away from a tie at this point.

wormer · Post by **wormer** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:59 pm

joedondero1919 wrote:you know, with half the distance to the goal, i would have liked to take that opportunity to go for two and get within 8. does anyone else agree? or would you just go for the safe 1, knowing a TD + FG = 1 point lead.

TD + FG = Lead. Kick the xtra pt and be done with it.

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:59 pm

Swishy KO to the end zone. Now let's see if the D came out for the 2nd half.

Kruncher · Post by **Kruncher** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 4:00 pm

Now, we need to stop there run game. Dude is getting 7 to 9 yards on first down.