Don't look now. . .

crazyhorse1 · Post by **crazyhorse1** » Sat Nov 17, 2007 3:47 pm

Let's get back to real Redskin football this week and bring back that wily old vet Mark Brunell to hand it off to Portis up the middle on every play.

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Sat Nov 17, 2007 6:04 pm

CH: I see that your glass is still hopelessly half empty.

GSPODS · Post by **GSPODS** » Sat Nov 17, 2007 6:19 pm

Countertrey wrote:CH: I see that your glass is still hopelessly half empty.

That glass is cracked, and therfore all empty.

theoneandonly#9 · Post by **theoneandonly#9** » Sat Nov 17, 2007 8:28 pm

I guess Choo Choo was a one hit wonder. Too bad, I hope Clinton can be content not dressing up and gaining over 100 yards per game

BeeGee · Post by **BeeGee** » Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:40 pm

Countertrey wrote: Possible... also possible that McCardell still has the stones to make them pay for that. Your db's don't really scare anyone...

Yeh I'm definitely not bragging on our DBs, but McCardell's never been a homerun threat and a hampered Moss changes things a little bit. We're a LOT better equipped to deal with man-to-man with both Newman and Henry healthy as opposed to having to pray that Reeves didn't get the socks beaten off him.

por-tiz2skins · Post by **por-tiz2skins** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:50 am

Portis if he hits 100 yards or 90 at best tomarrows game could be on pace for 1300 or 1400 yards.

welch · Post by **welch** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:51 pm

I guess Choo Choo was a one hit wonder. Too bad, I hope Clinton can be content not dressing up and gaining over 100 yards per game

Just for Redskin accuracy, there is, was, and will be only one Choo-choo. His given name was Charlie Justice, and he was a star RB and (I think) DB for the Redskins in the early '50's!!! :wink: