Official Redskins / Cardinals Game Day Thread

grampi · Post by **grampi** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:20 pm

self destruct time again.

TincoSkin · Post by **TincoSkin** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:20 pm

brad7686 wrote:portis=no vision

your post=no credibility

GSPODS · Post by **GSPODS** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:21 pm

brad7686 wrote:portis=no vision

The drugs are warping your sense of reality.

Montana Redskin · Post by **Montana Redskin** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:21 pm

nice, got cooley into game with a 5yd illegal proc, finally got his name in the mix

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:21 pm

If he throws to Sellers one more time Im going to freak out.

CanesSkins26 · Post by **CanesSkins26** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:21 pm

brad7686 wrote:portis=no vision

That's a pretty funny joke. Portis has very good vision. What do u expect when there are constantly defenders in the backfield and no open holes for backs to run through.

Hoss · Post by **Hoss** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:21 pm

here we go, tighten up your chin straps

brad7686 · Post by **brad7686** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:21 pm

GSPODS wrote:
brad7686 wrote:portis=no vision

The drugs are warping your sense of reality.

did u see the bertrand berry play? there was no one to the right and he just ran right into sellers back for no apparent reason

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:21 pm

GSPODS wrote:
brad7686 wrote:portis=no vision

The drugs are warping your sense of reality.

Chill out with the personal attacks. Attack the post not the poster. Read my posts for guidance.

grampi · Post by **grampi** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:22 pm

god, I hate those check-down passes, and then expect a 10 yard runto ge the first down. Throw the dam ball past the 1st down marker!

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:22 pm

CanesSkins26 wrote:
brad7686 wrote:portis=no vision

That's a pretty funny joke. Portis has very good vision. What do u expect when there are constantly defenders in the backfield and no open holes for backs to run through.

Portis has great vision but he DID cut the wrong way on that play.

grampi · Post by **grampi** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:23 pm

We've got a QB with a howitzer for an arm and he's throwing check-down passes.

grampi · Post by **grampi** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:24 pm

Can't we just borrow NE's offense every week?

TincoSkin · Post by **TincoSkin** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:24 pm

grampi wrote:We've got a QB with a howitzer for an arm and he's throwing check-down passes.

thats true, i dont know why we havnt gone deep for moss at all.

CanesSkins26 · Post by **CanesSkins26** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:24 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
brad7686 wrote:portis=no vision

That's a pretty funny joke. Portis has very good vision. What do u expect when there are constantly defenders in the backfield and no open holes for backs to run through.

Portis has great vision but he DID cut the wrong way on that play.

No disagreement there. I just don't understand the blanket statement after one bad play.

dlc · Post by **dlc** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:25 pm

The way our defense is playing (minus the penalties last drive), this shouldn't even be close. It seems like that our play calling on offense isn't very coordinated. No rhythm. Perhaps its because play calling isn't completely made by one person?

CanesSkins26 · Post by **CanesSkins26** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:25 pm

Come on defense

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:25 pm

Nice seeing an offensive throw the ball down the field. Sadly it isn't ours. LOLOL

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:25 pm

grampi wrote:We've got a QB with a howitzer for an arm and he's throwing check-down passes.

Well, if they're check-down passes, then I guess he's checking down to them, which means it's all on Campbell.

GSPODS · Post by **GSPODS** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:25 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
brad7686 wrote:portis=no vision

The drugs are warping your sense of reality.

Chill out with the personal attacks. Attack the post not the poster. Read my posts for guidance.

I am attacking the post. It has to be drugs because no one could possibly have complete control of their faculties and claim that Portis has no vision.
That's like claiming Rosie O'Donnell is hot. :puke:

It just isn't so.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:26 pm

This is getting scary. The defense is worn down. Will the offense step up?

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:26 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:Read my posts for guidance.

Don't think it was meant to, but that made me laugh out loud - might add to my signature.

CanesSkins26 · Post by **CanesSkins26** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:26 pm

GSPODS wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
brad7686 wrote:portis=no vision

The drugs are warping your sense of reality.

Chill out with the personal attacks. Attack the post not the poster. Read my posts for guidance.

I am attacking the post. It has to be drugs because no one could possibly have complete control of their faculties and claim that Portis has no vision.
That's like claiming Rosie O'Donnell is hot. It just isn't so.

I thought it was more like saying that Brittney Spears is a rational person and a fit, responsible parent.

Steve Spurrier III · Post by **Steve Spurrier III** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:27 pm

This is beginning to feel way too familiar.

brad7686 · Post by **brad7686** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:27 pm

GSPODS wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
brad7686 wrote:portis=no vision

The drugs are warping your sense of reality.

Chill out with the personal attacks. Attack the post not the poster. Read my posts for guidance.

I am attacking the post. It has to be drugs because no one could possibly have complete control of their faculties and claim that Portis has no vision.
That's like claiming Rosie O'Donnell is hot. It just isn't so.

if youve watched this game soberly, you could definitely make an argument he has no vision