DEPTH CHART ERROR......?

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
tribeofjudah
tribe
tribe
Posts: 7075
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:02 pm
Location: SURF CITY, HB, CALI *** Occasionally flying into a SUPERNOVA

DEPTH CHART ERROR......?

Post by tribeofjudah »

What is BLADES doing on the WR depth chart? I hope it's a misprint.
And CALDWELL is 3rd behind BL...?

OFFENSE Depth Chart
Position 1st String 2nd String 3rd String
WR 89 - Santana Moss 83 - James Thrash 54 - H.B. Blades
LT 60 - Chris Samuels 74 - Stephon Heyer
LG 66 - Pete Kendall 69 - Jason Fabini
C 61 - Casey Rabach 62 - Mike Pucillo
RG 77 - Randy Thomas 69 - Jason Fabini
RT 71 - Todd Wade
TE 47 - Chris Cooley 87 - Todd Yoder 84 - Cody Boyd
WR 82 - Antwaan Randle El 85 - Brandon Lloyd 86 - Reche Caldwell
QB 17 - Jason Campbell 15 - Todd Collins 8 - Mark Brunell
FB 45 - Mike Sellers
RB 26 - Clinton Portis 46 - Ladell Betts 31 - Rock Cartwright

http://www.redskins.com/team/depthchart.jsp
Proverbs 27:17 As iron sharpens iron,
so one person sharpens another.
Top
GSPODS
Hog
Posts: 4716
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:20 am

Post by GSPODS »

You're not reading the chart correctly.

Left WR 89 - (1)Santana Moss 83 - (2)James Thrash 54 - (3)H.B. Blades

Right WR 82 - (1)Antwaan Randle El 85 - (2)Brandon Lloyd 86 - (3)Reche Caldwell
Top
tribeofjudah
tribe
tribe
Posts: 7075
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:02 pm
Location: SURF CITY, HB, CALI *** Occasionally flying into a SUPERNOVA

Post by tribeofjudah »

Blades is a linebacker..... when did he convert to WR...

I think it's just a misprint....
Proverbs 27:17 As iron sharpens iron,
so one person sharpens another.
Top
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

They must have meant Bodiford. Both start with the letter B. Isn't that close enough?
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
Top
joebagadonuts
Mmmm...donuts
Mmmm...donuts
Posts: 2400
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 3:15 pm
Location: How much text will they let me fit in this 'Location' space? I mean, can I just keep writing and wr

Post by joebagadonuts »

I'd pay to see Blades run a WR screen.
I'm a jack of all trades, the master of three
Rockin' the tables, rockin' the mikes, rockin' the young lay-dees.
Top
GSPODS
Hog
Posts: 4716
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:20 am

Post by GSPODS »

joebagadonuts wrote:I'd pay to see Blades run a WR screen.


I'd also pay to see Blades block downfield on a wide receiver screen.
Top
User avatar
BernieSki
Hog
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 8:39 am
Location: Ashburn, VA

Post by BernieSki »

I would rather see him make the Pro Bowl as a linebacker.
BernSki
Top
gay4pacman
Pacman Rules
Pacman Rules
Posts: 1842
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:56 pm
Location: Lawn Monster

Post by gay4pacman »

id rather see him stay on the bench and learn from our great LB core.
I know this guy named Jimmy, he has a pet....POSTERNUTBAG! Thats his cats name, POSTERNUTBAG!!!
Top
User avatar
dmwc
Hog
Posts: 393
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 8:55 am
Location: McGuire AFB, NJ

Post by dmwc »

gay4pacman wrote:id rather see him stay on the bench and learn from our great LB core.


2nd that
>>>IT STARTS WITH D and O LINEMEN, EVERY DOWN, EVERY GAME, EVERY SEASON<<<

RIP # 21!

Tired of people who think we need superstars at EVERY position to excel... we dont... just 53 guys who are tough an smart
Top
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

dmwc wrote:
gay4pacman wrote:id rather see him stay on the bench and learn from our great LB core.


2nd that


All in favor say, Aye.

Aye!

However, if we get any more injuries to the D-line and we will have to go to a 3-4 (I know we only have one and he will be back this week, but one injury at a time is al that thin line can handle)
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
Top
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

We will not be playing a 3-4 defense in the true sense of that - we do not have the players for that "system" - we will see some formations that look like it but it is not a 3-4 defense.
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Top
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

SkinsJock wrote:We will not be playing a 3-4 defense in the true sense of that - we do not have the players for that "system" - we will see some formations that look like it but it is not a 3-4 defense.


I don't agree that we lack the personnell for a 3-4. Carter has played OLB in a 3-4 & Wilson probably could as well. I think Montgomery & Golston could play in a 3-4. That doesn't mean that GW likes the 3-4 or will use it.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
Top
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:
Contact 1niksder

Post by 1niksder »

yupchagee wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:We will not be playing a 3-4 defense in the true sense of that - we do not have the players for that "system" - we will see some formations that look like it but it is not a 3-4 defense.


I don't agree that we lack the personnell for a 3-4. Carter has played OLB in a 3-4 & Wilson probably could as well. I think Montgomery & Golston could play in a 3-4. That doesn't mean that GW likes the 3-4 or will use it.

Whose the big body NT in this scheme?
Didn't Carter's play fell off when he played OLB in SF?
Wilson made the team because of his speed coming off the edge why stand him up and have him a step off the line?
Montgomery & Golston both are in there second year and neither has played in the scheme before, why would you think they can do it now?

I'd say stick with the cover 3 morphing in and out of cover 2
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Top
User avatar
LOSTHOG
Hog
Posts: 803
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:30 am
Location: NORTH CAROLINA

Post by LOSTHOG »

1niksder wrote:
yupchagee wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:We will not be playing a 3-4 defense in the true sense of that - we do not have the players for that "system" - we will see some formations that look like it but it is not a 3-4 defense.


I don't agree that we lack the personnell for a 3-4. Carter has played OLB in a 3-4 & Wilson probably could as well. I think Montgomery & Golston could play in a 3-4. That doesn't mean that GW likes the 3-4 or will use it.

Whose the big body NT in this scheme?
Didn't Carter's play fell off when he played OLB in SF?
Wilson made the team because of his speed coming off the edge why stand him up and have him a step off the line?
Montgomery & Golston both are in there second year and neither has played in the scheme before, why would you think they can do it now?

I'd say stick with the cover 3 morphing in and out of cover 2


If it ain't broke don't fix it
Top
User avatar
BnGhog
Hog
Posts: 1553
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:23 pm
Location: Danville VA

Post by BnGhog »

It has been said many times, that the cover 3's weak link is 7-15 yard passes. I think it is too. All of McNabb's passes were in this range. We will have to mix this up. Otherwise, it won't take long for our opponets to start using this to their advantage.

As Joe an Al do consistantly the 7-15 yard passes will kill us, and time of possesion. We mixed it up more against the Eagles than we did in our first game. I also wonder, If this is only because thats what we saw GB used and the Eagles couldn't do much. We didn't see that bump-n-run in the first game.
I firmly believe the Patriots are the antichrist.
Top
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

1niksder wrote:
yupchagee wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:We will not be playing a 3-4 defense in the true sense of that - we do not have the players for that "system" - we will see some formations that look like it but it is not a 3-4 defense.


I don't agree that we lack the personnell for a 3-4. Carter has played OLB in a 3-4 & Wilson probably could as well. I think Montgomery & Golston could play in a 3-4. That doesn't mean that GW likes the 3-4 or will use it.

Whose the big body NT in this scheme?
Didn't Carter's play fell off when he played OLB in SF?
Wilson made the team because of his speed coming off the edge why stand him up and have him a step off the line?
Montgomery & Golston both are in there second year and neither has played in the scheme before, why would you think they can do it now?

I'd say stick with the cover 3 morphing in and out of cover 2


I think Wilson has the speed & agility to play OLB in a 3-4. Golston & Montgomery have the athleticism to handle DE in 3-4. Daniels has the strength & skills. Griff can clog the middle. I'm not saying we SHOULD run a 3-4, just that we could add that to the mix once in a while.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
Top
User avatar
SKINFAN
Hog
Posts: 1659
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Sterling, Virginia

Post by SKINFAN »

BernieSki wrote:I would rather see him make the Pro Bowl as a linebacker.



Linebacker that can catch.. hopefully that's what it means..
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Hog Wash - Washington Football Team”