If in fact Gardner is traded...

Washington Football Game Day discussions for 2003, 2004, and 2005
Locked
User avatar
DG28
swine
Posts: 60
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: Maryland

If in fact Gardner is traded...

Post by DG28 »

Do we draft Mike Williams WR out of USC? Discuss.

~one~
Sunday's ain't the same, without no football.
User avatar
FatPat
piggie
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: New York City

Post by FatPat »

no, no, and no...if we can somehow swindle the chargers in giving up their second round pick we can get a good interior D-lineman in the draft, but i dont think the chargers will part with the second round pick for rod (possibly third)
surferskin
Hog
Posts: 588
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: virginia beach

Post by surferskin »

yeah, we're too thin on the d-line to waste pick on a WR and i'm actually for getting taylor. i think he'd have bigger impact on our team than any other player in this draft.
"People that think they know it all are especially annoying to those of us who do."
User avatar
hogred
piggie
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 8:59 am
Location: Maine

Post by hogred »

The addition of Thrash further crowds the Washington receiver corps and could fuel speculation that starter Rod Gardner, the team's first-round pick in 2001, might be dangled as trade bait. The Redskins already have lead receiver Laveranues Coles and the coaches like young wideout Darnerian McCants. With Thrash, 2003 second-rounder Taylor Jacobs and the fleet Cliff Russell on the roster, the Redskins have good depth.
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Post by riggofan »

Why would we draft another WR? We're loaded at WR.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You can't do epic **** with basic people." - DJax
"We're on the rise, man, whether you're on the train or not." - Josh Norman
redskinz4ever
******
******
Posts: 2630
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 3:55 pm
Location: charlotte nc

Post by redskinz4ever »

DEFENSE- DEFENSE- DEFENSE that is where our pick needs to be directed toward.we have plenty of wideouts on the roster now,not to mention after the last cut down day we might sign a good wide out or something else.REDSKINZ4EVER!!!
TOUCHDOWN .....WASHINGTON REDSKINS !!!!
whomp-em
swine
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 4:12 pm
Location: Annapolis, MD
Contact:

Post by whomp-em »

no way the 'skins take a WR in any round even if they unload Rod. The top 4 would be Coles, McCants, Jacobs and Thrash with Cliff Russell and Justin Skaggs on the bench. no need, or room, for Williams. but i still think a 2nd rounder is possible as long as the selling point is Gardner's 2002 season. 3 different QBs and he still had 1000 yards as the #1 option.
RedskinsRule56
Hog
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 6:56 pm
Location: DC

Post by RedskinsRule56 »

It has been reiterated that Gardner will not be traded! I think Gardner will have a great year this year as our #2 WR! He has a lot of potential! He had a great year 2 years ago but struggled a lot last year! No way we should take a WR if we trade him! Redskinz4ever nailed it when he said take Defense! We need to address our front four!! Take Udeze or Harris!!
"SUCK FOR LUCK"
Locked