blchizzleke wrote:its sad when people say 'i dont care what he has been convicted of, hes still a clown'....that is why we have people like a man in Georgia this week who are being sentenced to death penalties yearly who are innocent or at least overwhelming evidence suggests it....
You're still missing my point, because you're assuming that when I say "he's still a thug" I mean something like "I wouldn't mind seeing him go to jail."
I take violent behavior very seriously, and I would never advocate having the law come down unjustly on
anyone ever, no matter how much I dislike them personally. In my view, Pacman shouldn't even go to prison for telling someone to fire a gun, unless he was threatening them to do so by physical violence (yes, RiC, I'm familiar with how the legal system works in practice, and that this is a departure from it).
The fact that I can't criticize Pacman without being accused of trying to 'convict' an innocent person is proof of how twisted our society is, where everyone assumes that you want to force your personal opinions onto others with
physical violence and not only through persuasion. I call Pacman a thug because he
is one, and whether or not I want him in a prison cell has little to do with it. But say that you think he's a disgrace and everyone jumps on you because the law hasn't found him "guilty."
As far as I'm concerned, and once again this is just my view, Pacman can spend all day in clubs or doing drugs or getting prostitutes or
whatever it is that he wants which doesn't use violence against others or their property, and I'll never ask an authority to put him in prison for it. (And, yes, this is a departure from popular opinion). But I still think that it's important in life to identify what's good and moral and what's immoral. . .and Pacman has definitely identified himself with the latter.