Who Drafted the Tomlinsons and who drafted the Leafs?

Talk about the AFC, NFC, the NFL Draft, College Football... anything football that has no Washington Football Team relevance.
Post Reply
Skins2daGrave
Hog
Posts: 719
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:30 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Who Drafted the Tomlinsons and who drafted the Leafs?

Post by Skins2daGrave »

http://www.realgmfootball.com/src_twelf ... the_leafs/


Laron Landry, S, LSU

Landry is a cross between Ed Reed and Troy Polamalu. With enough speed to adequately play pass coverage, Landry excels at run support. Landry boasts the speed to make plays sideline to sideline against the run. The versatile Landry, a four-year starter at LSU, possesses enough size, agility and ball skills to match up with the NFL’s new aged tight ends. The one knock on Landry is his lack of ideal size. At 213 pounds some NFL executives wonder if Landry’s lack of size will result in injury, due to the hurtle collisions that accrue at the safety position. Any team that drafts Landry will get a safety that has the potential to be a game-changing player, which is difficult to find in the NFL.


i think he's wrong about Alan Branch though, he looks really good and im surprised he dropped to the 2nd round
16 Ounce Bottle Of Coke: $2
3 Bags Of Chips: $8
40" Plasma Screen TV: $2000
Watching the Cowgirls get beaten in Dallas with 2 4th Quarter TD passes to Santana Moss: Priceless
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Re: Who Drafted the Tomlinsons and who drafted the Leafs?

Post by Irn-Bru »

The one knock on Landry is his lack of ideal size. At 213 pounds some NFL executives wonder if Landry’s lack of size will result in injury, due to the hurtle collisions that accrue at the safety position.



L Landry: 213 lbs
T Polamalu: 212 lbs
E Reed: 200 lbs


There might still be merit to what they're saying (I haven't checked into height / weight ratios or anything), but it does seem suspicious that the 2 great safeties they compared him to actually weigh less, and he gets knocked for weight. :|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Re: Who Drafted the Tomlinsons and who drafted the Leafs?

Post by SkinsJock »

Irn-Bru wrote:
The one knock on Landry is his lack of ideal size. At 213 pounds some NFL executives wonder if Landry’s lack of size will result in injury, due to the hurtle collisions that accrue at the safety position.



L Landry: 213 lbs
T Polamalu: 212 lbs
E Reed: 200 lbs


There might still be merit to what they're saying (I haven't checked into height / weight ratios or anything), but it does seem suspicious that the 2 great safeties they compared him to actually weigh less, and he gets knocked for weight. :|


^^^ good point FFA :lol:

praise indeed to be compared to those two - though a little early IMO - hopefully in a short while he can be included with these 2 very good players.
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Re: Who Drafted the Tomlinsons and who drafted the Leafs?

Post by SkinsFreak »

Irn-Bru wrote:
The one knock on Landry is his lack of ideal size. At 213 pounds some NFL executives wonder if Landry’s lack of size will result in injury, due to the hurtle collisions that accrue at the safety position.



L Landry: 213 lbs
T Polamalu: 212 lbs
E Reed: 200 lbs


There might still be merit to what they're saying (I haven't checked into height / weight ratios or anything), but it does seem suspicious that the 2 great safeties they compared him to actually weigh less, and he gets knocked for weight. :|


Yeah, good stuff, Irn-Bru!

At 213 pounds some NFL executives wonder if Landry’s lack of size will result in injury


Landry was a four-year starter at LSU and played in the SEC.

Umm... how many games did Landry miss over those four years due to injury?

ZERO!
Steve Spurrier III
----------
----------
Posts: 2167
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 1:48 am

Post by Steve Spurrier III »

Landry, at 6'2", is significantly taller than Polamalu (5'10") and Reed (5'11"), so he is more slender than both men.

But I still don't see that as a valid concern, especially considering he can (and probably will) be able to add mass at his age.
I'm bored, I'm broke, and I'm back.
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

Steve Spurrier III wrote:Landry, at 6'2", is significantly taller than Polamalu (5'10") and Reed (5'11"), so he is more slender than both men.

But I still don't see that as a valid concern, especially considering he can (and probably will) be able to add mass at his age.


So are you trying to say that they are more "solid" than Landry?
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
Steve Spurrier III
----------
----------
Posts: 2167
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 1:48 am

Post by Steve Spurrier III »

I don't know an exact definition of "solid". My only point is that Landry does in fact have a higher height to weight ratio than Troy Polamalu and Ed Reed. Whether that's even a problem, I don't know.
I'm bored, I'm broke, and I'm back.
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

Steve Spurrier III wrote:I don't know an exact definition of "solid". My only point is that Landry does in fact have a higher height to weight ratio than Troy Polamalu and Ed Reed. Whether that's even a problem, I don't know.


LOL, I was about to ask you the same thing.

By solid, I use Rock as an example. Being shorter kinda gives you a lower center of gravity and makes you a bit more "solid" cus it's all compacted in a smaller frame.

I was wondering if that's what you were getting at in your comparison.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
Steve Spurrier III
----------
----------
Posts: 2167
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2004 1:48 am

Post by Steve Spurrier III »

That's true. Although it's not how low you naturally are, but rather how low you can get on the field that is going to determine how successful you are. Shorter players do have an advantage in that department, but something tells me that neither Landry or the Redskins would give away those three inches even if they could.

Just as a comparison, Sean Taylor is 6'2", 232. I think Landry has room to add mass should he want to, but I'm not concerned about his body type at all.
I'm bored, I'm broke, and I'm back.
HEROHAMO
|||
|||
Posts: 4752
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:34 am
Location: SANTA ANA,CA
Contact:

Post by HEROHAMO »

How hard is it to really gain ten pounds? No worries at all. Plenty of players come out of college and gain muscle in the next level.
Sean Taylor starting free safety Heavens team!

21 Forever

"The show must go on."
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

Considering current circumstances, I am going to change an old adage "it's not the size of the man in the fight, it's the fight in the man that is more of a determining factor" :wink:

Landry will obviously be at whatever weight he needs to be to be the most effective. I think our 2 safeties will affect some teams game planning this year and I think Williams' defense will be a force this year because as a group (and with the assistant coaches help) they will make the players around them more effective.
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
SeanTaylorJr.
piggie
Posts: 138
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: San Diego, America's Finest City

Post by SeanTaylorJr. »

this argument is retarted, really shows how bad this post draft/ pre pre-season time really is. the author of that article doesnt know what he's talking about. players never get hurt because they don't weigh enough, ever! players get hurt because their limbs are twisted it unnatural ways, or have extreme force put on them in an akward position, or have damaged/ weak tendons or ligaments, or are dehydrated/ tight. ect ect ect. hmm none of those had anything to do with his height or weight; LL has never missed a game and there are 0 indications he will have that problem in the league.
On the eighth day God created Sean Taylor- and he was good.
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

Also, those who deliver the big "hits" get hurt far less than those who receive them. :wink:
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Post by Irn-Bru »

SeanTaylorJr. wrote:this argument is retarted, really shows how bad this post draft/ pre pre-season time really is. the author of that article doesnt know what he's talking about. players never get hurt because they don't weigh enough, ever! players get hurt because their limbs are twisted it unnatural ways, or have extreme force put on them in an akward position, or have damaged/ weak tendons or ligaments, or are dehydrated/ tight. ect ect ect. hmm none of those had anything to do with his height or weight; LL has never missed a game and there are 0 indications he will have that problem in the league.



Height and weight can be good indicators of strength and ability to take a hit. If you have a 230 lb. running back running full speed, and a safety flies in to make a hit, a 20 lb. difference will be hugely important on the following events. Think about the damage that happens when you have a Honda Civic colliding with an Hummer as opposed to another Civic (with all other things being equal). Throw a small enough safety in there -- however well conditioned he may be -- and he's going to get hurt.

One additional problem is when players add too much weight, they can also incur injury. When a wide receiver has a lot of extra weight, even if it's muscle, he may gain an advantage in breaking tackles or positioning down field to make a catch, but his knees and other ligaments will take a much harder beating than they would normally (i.e., if he stuck to a more natural body weight for his frame). As far as I understand it, this is essentially what happened to David Boston: incredible talent and ability, amazing strength, but just a bit too much weight for his frame. He started getting injuries all of the time, and especially knee injuries.
Post Reply