CLL wrote:brad7686 wrote: Def not worth champ bailey now.
Champ would have left and we would have gotten nothing....haven't realized that yet?
About one-third of the people who post here still haven't realized that
brad7686 wrote:Will you stop copping out? It doesn't matter what system it is Portis doesn't put up the numbers. period.
Fios wrote:CLL wrote:brad7686 wrote: Def not worth champ bailey now.
Champ would have left and we would have gotten nothing....haven't realized that yet?
About one-third of the people who post here still haven't realized that
brad7686 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:brad7686 wrote:
Yea drop off. Here's a stat for you. In the magic "2005 greatest season ever oh my gosh lets purchase portis jock off ebay" season he only amassed about 150 more total yards then betts had last year when he didnt even start that much.
Again, you're comparing two different systems under two different QB's. It's not a fair comparisoin. I covered that already and now remeber why I didn't quote this.brad7686 wrote:You want to talk about bad run defenses? Portis averaged 3.6 ypc vs. INDY last year. INDY.
I coulda sworn Indy shut down one of the best running teams in the super bowl.
Didn't Portis have injured shoulders? DOesn't a RB lead with his shoulders?brad7686 wrote:And by drop off i mean check his denver numbers.
So 1500 yards isn't enough for you?brad7686 wrote: Def not worth champ bailey now.
Champ would have left and we would have gotten nothing....haven't realized that yet?
Will you stop copping out? It doesn't matter what system it is Portis doesn't put up the numbers. period.
Fios wrote:The system doesn't matter? That's a ridiculous statement ... and he STILL HOLDS THE SINGLE-SEASON RECORD ... you can't simply blow by that because it makes your argument more difficult.
Chris Luva Luva wrote:brad7686 wrote:Will you stop copping out? It doesn't matter what system it is Portis doesn't put up the numbers. period.
Prove it.Fios wrote:CLL wrote:brad7686 wrote: Def not worth champ bailey now.
Champ would have left and we would have gotten nothing....haven't realized that yet?
About one-third of the people who post here still haven't realized that
And I'm as stubborn as they come but even I've come to realize that.
Fios wrote:brad7686 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:brad7686 wrote:
Yea drop off. Here's a stat for you. In the magic "2005 greatest season ever oh my gosh lets purchase portis jock off ebay" season he only amassed about 150 more total yards then betts had last year when he didnt even start that much.
Again, you're comparing two different systems under two different QB's. It's not a fair comparisoin. I covered that already and now remeber why I didn't quote this.brad7686 wrote:You want to talk about bad run defenses? Portis averaged 3.6 ypc vs. INDY last year. INDY.
I coulda sworn Indy shut down one of the best running teams in the super bowl.
Didn't Portis have injured shoulders? DOesn't a RB lead with his shoulders?brad7686 wrote:And by drop off i mean check his denver numbers.
So 1500 yards isn't enough for you?brad7686 wrote: Def not worth champ bailey now.
Champ would have left and we would have gotten nothing....haven't realized that yet?
Will you stop copping out? It doesn't matter what system it is Portis doesn't put up the numbers. period.
The system doesn't matter? That's a ridiculous statement ... and he STILL HOLDS THE SINGLE-SEASON RECORD ... you can't simply blow by that because it makes your argument more difficult.
brad7686 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:brad7686 wrote:well since all you hypocrites want to make excuses for portis' lack of prodcution
Please show me his lack of production? Show us how 1500 yards is a lack of production.
Who excused a lack of production? I just blew holes on your horrible comparision between Portis and Betts. You simply cannot use the 2006 year as a basis for Betts is better. Portis hasn't played in the system for a full year and he was injured. You can use the previous Gibbs years but Betts didn't do good in those years.
Eclipsing every REDSKIN RB in history is "drop off" in production to you?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Are you not able to comprehend how a passing game of over 3 yards an attempt will stretch a defense?
Did you not hear the safety from Green Bay state that his team knew that MB wouldn't throw the long ball and it allowed them to focus soley on CP?
How many 8 man fronts did Betts see in contrast to the fronts that Portis saw in 2005? It definitely was a lot less.
CP was 4th in the ENTIRE LEAGUE IN RUSHING IN 2005.
CP was 8th in the ENTIRE LEAGUE in rushing in 2004.
CP WAS 5TH IN THE ENTIRE LEAGUE IN 2003.
![]()
Drop Off?
Dude that was a terrible post.[/quote
Yea drop off. Here's a stat for you. In the magic "2005 greatest season ever oh my gosh lets purchase portis jock off ebay" season he only amassed about 150 more total yards then betts had last year when he didnt even start that much. And also i dont think philly is that bad that every rb should get 171 yards rushing against them every time. You want to talk about bad run defenses? Portis averaged 3.6 ypc vs. INDY last year. INDY. And by drop off i mean check his denver numbers. Def not worth champ bailey now. OVER A WHOLE YARD DIFFERENCE IN YARDS PER CARRY. And don't call my posts terrible they have more meaningful stats than yours. You keep posting total rushing yards numbers but if someone gets run into the ground then they will have to produce. Look at the yards per carry.
brad7686 wrote:
Portis is the one who has to prove it
Chris Luva Luva wrote:brad7686 wrote:
Portis is the one who has to prove it
Dude, you have no real debate you're just hear to play devils advocate. You don't even come back with serious rebuttal's.
I added more to my post above yours. Reply to those questions, I'm curious to see what you come up with.
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Betts was playing in the offense thought brought us Larry Johnson and Priest Holmes.....
So Brad, you say Portis was made because of Denvers system???
I argue that Betts was made because of Al's system and his track record of great RB's........
Yet Clinton Portis has been consistent throughout 3 different offenses. Betts has finally found an offense that my dead grandmother could run in and now he's all of a sudden a beast?![]()
Didnt you knock CP for being made because of the system?
Didn't you call us all hypocrites earlier?
Doesn't this make you seem a bit hypocritical?
brad7686 wrote:just because i don't like portis unlike everybody else on here doesn't mean i'm wrong.
Fios wrote:CLL wrote:brad7686 wrote: Def not worth champ bailey now.
Champ would have left and we would have gotten nothing....haven't realized that yet?
About one-third of the people who post here still haven't realized that
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:Betts was playing in the offense thought brought us Larry Johnson and Priest Holmes.....
So Brad, you say Portis was made because of Denvers system???
I argue that Betts was made because of Al's system and his track record of great RB's........
Yet Clinton Portis has been consistent throughout 3 different offenses. Betts has finally found an offense that my dead grandmother could run in and now he's all of a sudden a beast?![]()
Didnt you knock CP for being made because of the system?
Didn't you call us all hypocrites earlier?
Doesn't this make you seem a bit hypocritical?
Why haven't you answered these questions?
brad7686 wrote:No because i compared Portis to denver where he played well, and then here where he dropped off. Betts would have to go to another team, and then suck like portis did, in order for that to be the same thing.
brad7686 wrote:No its pointless for me to debate with an entire board that ignores statistics. So i'm done.
brad7686 wrote:Could be me. We'll find out next year i guess.
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Im just glad they're both running well.