What do all these people have in common?

ATV · Post by **ATV** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:54 pm

Can you guess what all these people have in common?

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:56 pm

They're all related?

ATV · Post by **ATV** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:57 pm

Fair enough, I'll add that.

Whups, sorry, can't change that now. Ah, well. I thought it might be too obvious, anyhow.

DESkins · Post by **DESkins** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:57 pm

Between the Yankee accents and Texas drawls, they all sound kinda funny?

ATV · Post by **ATV** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:59 pm

Yea, mostly, I suspect that not all of them sound funny, though.

Cappster · Post by **Cappster** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 3:13 pm

6. ATV doesn't like any of them and believes at least one of them is the Devil incarnate. <<<<<----I choose option 6

ATV · Post by **ATV** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 3:19 pm

Answer the question, please, Sir. Straightforward question here - There's no tricks (although I can imagine it's a little subjective as to whether you think they're dressed handsomely).

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 3:50 pm

I bet they all have nice shoes. Do I win?

andyjens89 · Post by **andyjens89** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 3:55 pm

¿NO?

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:17 pm

My top ten answers:

#10: They are all more truthful then John Kerry
#9: They are all more sober then Ted Kennedy
#8: They all don't think it's still the year 2000 like Al Gore
#7: They are all less angry then Harry Reid
#6: They all have more ideas of their own then Barack Obama
#5: They all generate fewer greenhouse gases then Nancy Pelosi
#4: They are all funnier then Al Franken since he joined AirAmerica
#3: They all think oral sex is sex, unlike Bill Clinton
#2: They all believe in personal responsibility more then ambulance chaser John Edwards

and

#1: They all have better legs then Hillary Clinton

ATV · Post by **ATV** » Wed Mar 21, 2007 7:45 pm

Spoken like a true diverter.

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:09 am

No, hold on, I can get this one

None of them have ever belonged to the KKK like Robert Byrd?

None of them harassed men for sexual favors like Jim McGreevy?

None of them murdered women and children like Janet Reno?

None of them plagerized papers like Joe Biden?

None of them professed their undying support for Saddam Hussein like Dick Durbin?

None of them called their political opponents Nazis like Al Franken?

None of them praised a KKK member as the "Conscience of the Senate" like Christopher Dodd?

None of them reported shallow fabricated documents as factual like Dan Rather?

None of them kept stuffing secret documents down their pants and sneaking them out of the national archives like Sandy Burger because they are "sloppy?"

None of them stole taxpayer money like Dan Rostenkowski?

None of them murdered their aides and dumped them in a park like Gary Condit?

None of them sexually harassed women in the oval office like Bill Clinton on liberal Democratic activist Kathleen Wiley?

I got it, I think, none of them think Howard Dean is always right on every issue?

Cmon, give me a hint. I sure am tired of this Republican "culture of corruption."

tcwest10 · Post by **tcwest10** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:00 am

There are some extremely tall people in the back, I think.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:06 am

There aren't any black folk. :idea:

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:54 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:There aren't any black folk.

Sure there are. They're just a Michael Jackson shade of black.

And I still think they all have nice shoes.

Fios · Post by **Fios** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:06 pm

They are all in a photograph!

BossHog · Post by **BossHog** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:11 pm

Who are 'people who have never been in my kitchen'?

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:38 pm

BossHog wrote:Who are 'people who have never been in my kitchen'?

Men who live with their mothers, Beer, ...

That was a classic episode

ATV · Post by **ATV** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:36 am

Would a laundry list of Republican goofs, crimes and criminals even fit on this server?

Besides, what does this have to do with the folks on the photograph? Nothing.

Diversion.

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:40 am

ATV wrote:Would a laundry list of Republican goofs, crimes and criminals even fit on this server?

The ones in reality? About the same.

The ones on liberal blogs and in liberal minds? Who cares? But liberals will focus on that instead of actually providing an agenda because they neither party has an agenda, they are just fighting about who's behind the steering wheel as they drive down the same road.

ATV wrote:Besides, what does this have to do with the folks on the photograph? Nothing.

Diversion.

It's a stupid poll.

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:18 am

This is the liberal approach to marketing the product.

Dear Sir,

I was in our system preparing to fill your many orders for our products and was deeply shocked to realize you have no outstanding orders with us.

This, Sir, makes you stupid and obviously a customer of our competitor's product. You are not allowed to buy our competitors product, it is not up to you. We have deeply researched the subject and determined our own product is far superior in every way.

- Our own product is always good and everyone on our staff always conducts themselves with the most honorable of intentions

- We have made endless accusations against our competitors which proves their deep corruption

- While our products may appear to be the same as our competitor's, I most assuredly tell you they are in fact fundamentally different

- You do not need to pay for our product, we send your bill to only the richest customers

If you disagree with this notice you are to buy our products and only our products, simply endlessly research and document why you should be allowed to buy any of our competitors. We will submit it to our appeals department who will treat it with the respect due such trash and inform you your request has been denied.

I am disgusted and reviled by you and will be until you end your overt stupidity and buy our product and only our product. Keep in mind this is not up to you, it is our choice whether you are allowed to buy any other product but our own and we will never grant such a request so don't bother.

Sincerely,

The liberal marketing department.

---------------------------------

No wonder these people couldn't even beat George Bush. Liberals have no responsiblity to convince people they should vote for them, they just attack them until they do. Doesn't matter who they vote for or why, they are not liberals. And even being like Joe Lieberman and disagreeing with them on one issue doesn't cut it. You will only buy the product.

flamethrower · Post by **flamethrower** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:12 pm

That was deeep man. Now wait til ATV reads it.

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:21 pm

I'm sorry - I didn't realise this was about politics. I thought we were all going to play nicely and try to guess what they all have in common.

Now it's all gone silly, and we're in for another interminable bout of American political arse-scratching. Yawn

KazooSkinsFan · Post by **KazooSkinsFan** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:33 pm

UK Skins Fan wrote:I'm sorry - I didn't realise this was about politics. I thought we were all going to play nicely and try to guess what they all have in common.

Now it's all gone silly, and we're in for another interminable bout of American political arse-scratching.

I don't think you were serious, but you did realize it was a picture of Bush and company, right? With the implication they send the troops to the Middle East but their kids don't go? Which is completely different from Democrats who send our troops to the Middle East but their kids don't go.

Wait, so that's not different. What's the point again ATV?

So are the liberals on your side of the pond lost in a haze of hatred, anger and intolerance for anyone who thinks differently like they are over here?

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:57 pm

KazooSkinsFan wrote:
UK Skins Fan wrote:I'm sorry - I didn't realise this was about politics. I thought we were all going to play nicely and try to guess what they all have in common.

Now it's all gone silly, and we're in for another interminable bout of American political arse-scratching.

I don't think you were serious, but you did realize it was a picture of Bush and company, right? With the implication they send the troops to the Middle East but their kids don't go? Which is completely different from Democrats who send our troops to the Middle East but their kids don't go.

Wait, so that's not different. What's the point again ATV?

So are the liberals on your side of the pond lost in a haze of hatred, anger and intolerance for anyone who thinks differently like they are over here?

Damn right I wasn't serious - nice to see that my subtlety was not lost on you. :wink:

Actually, liberals on this side of the pond are viewed entirely differently than they seem to be over there. I say "seem" because I can't be sure whether the hostility that I see directed at liberals on this site is a reflection of a generally held view, or just the opinion of particularly vehement individuals. :wink:

The difference here is that we have three major political parties, and the liberal party is the smallest of the three. They are therefore not a realistic prospect for government, except in a hung parliament. This means that they often benefit from protest votes aimed at the two larger parties - many votes for the liberal party are actually votes against the two others. The policies of the liberal party are far less well scrutinised by the general public than those of the other parties, and they just don't attract the same polarisation of views that liberals do in the US. What the liberals do offer though, is a viewpoint that needs to be addressed by the conservatives and labour, in order to win votes. Increasingly, parliamentary majorities in this country cannot be gained simply by appealing to the core vote.

Liberal in the US appears to be a term which is entirely interchangeable with democrat, at least to many. Over here, liberal opinions are simply part of the rich mix of views that inform our political debate. Liberals themselves are certainly not considered with the same scorn that some of you guys seem to view them over there.

Personally, I think the US is badly in need of a third major political movement, to significantly move the debate.

What might interest you though, is that the liberal party over here voted against the Iraq War, before it happened, and have stuck firmly to that opinion ever since. I didn't agree with their stance at the time, but they had a view and were prepared to stand by it. They have not sought to "have their cake, and eat it", as we say over here. From what I've read, that doesn't seem to be the same approach as the one taken by your democrats (at least from what you've been saying).