Trade scenario!!!

tj123456 · Post by **tj123456** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:05 pm

Ok, tell me what you think... Lance briggs for our 5th, 7th, and Adam archuleta.

I know we have to figure out his contract his situation, but say we did. Would this be acceptable considering the massive weight we are only recently now placing on the importance of draft picks???

I say do it...

Just a thought considering Rocky is a ??? and lemar is o.k. Also, the bears really need some help at strong safety, not to mention the St. Louis connection...

Thought???

kkryan · Post by **kkryan** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:40 pm

tj123456 wrote:Ok, tell me what you think... Lance briggs for our 5th, 7th, and Adam archuleta.

I know we have to figure out his contract his situation, but say we did. Would this be acceptable considering the massive weight we are only recently now placing on the importance of draft picks???

I say do it...

Just a thought considering Rocky is a ??? and lemar is o.k. Also, the bears really need some help at strong safety, not to mention the St. Louis connection...

Thought???

I think you have been drinking. There is NO way they give us his rights for AA, and two low round draft choices.

aswas71788 · Post by **aswas71788** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:10 am

Personally, I hope the Redskins stand pat with what they have and what they can get in the draft. Maybe resign some players but work with what is there. It isn't as bad as 06 indicated.

JCaptMorgan12 · Post by **JCaptMorgan12** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:12 am

kkryan wrote:I think you have been drinking. There is NO way they give us his rights for AA, and two low round draft choices.

I second this thought, and I have NOT been drinking...

crazyhorse1 · Post by **crazyhorse1** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:13 am

tj123456 wrote:Ok, tell me what you think... Lance briggs for our 5th, 7th, and Adam archuleta.

I know we have to figure out his contract his situation, but say we did. Would this be acceptable considering the massive weight we are only recently now placing on the importance of draft picks???

I say do it...

Just a thought considering Rocky is a ??? and lemar is o.k. Also, the bears really need some help at strong safety, not to mention the St. Louis connection...

Thought???

Any day of the week. Maybe they'll even throw in Angelina Joli.

DaSkins24 · Post by **DaSkins24** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:44 am

Maybe while we are at it, we can toss in Rock Cartwright and get Brian Urlacher back as well.

HanburgerHelper · Post by **HanburgerHelper** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 1:01 am

Briggs is a great player but I don't want his attitude for our locker room. He's all about money. Besides, I don't want to invest in any more linebackers. I think we can develop the talent we already have into a great linebacking corps. Let's focus on more pressing needs like DT, DE, CB, and OG. I still think we need to draft Zabransky at QB if he's around in the 4th or 5th. He's going to be special.

fredp45 · Post by **fredp45** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:51 am

Instead of Biggs see if they'll give us Tommy Harris..then I'd do it!!!

Mursilis · Post by **Mursilis** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:55 am

BossHog · Post by **BossHog** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:01 am

Awesome... maybe we can just get someone to give us a pro bowler for our 7th round pick. I heard the seventh round will be chock full of talent this year.

Forget the salary cap, forget relative player abilities... let's just make some deals...

MEZZSKIN · Post by **MEZZSKIN** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:34 pm

But what is going on here the last couple of weeks...have some people lost there minds. first the Russell Thread then a trade offer in which we give our "rudy"(AA-Scout team extraordinaire)) plus a seventh rounder for one of the best LB'S in the game...WHEW..were better than this guys

tj123456 · Post by **tj123456** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:55 pm

Someone asked if i had been drinking??? yes I had as a matter of fact, and the humorous responses are shedding a kinder light on my hangover...

Also, I have been on this site thousands of times in the last few years, but only recently decided to start posting things...

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:58 pm

Someone asked if i had been drinking??? yes I had as a matter of fact, and the humorous responses are shedding a kinder light on my hangover...

Oh, sure... the old "evil ethanol took over my mind" excuse.

Works every time :wink:

Fanforever · Post by **Fanforever** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:07 pm

tj123456 wrote:Ok, tell me what you think... Lance briggs for our 5th, 7th, and Adam archuleta.

I know we have to figure out his contract his situation, but say we did. Would this be acceptable considering the massive weight we are only recently now placing on the importance of draft picks???

I say do it...

Just a thought considering Rocky is a ??? and lemar is o.k. Also, the bears really need some help at strong safety, not to mention the St. Louis connection...

Thought???

If I'm not mistaken, the Bears have tagged Briggs so there's no way you could possibly get him for that type compensation. The tag carries with it automatic 1st round picks.

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:34 pm

Don't worry about the minor details - this is just a discussion - we are allowed to make stuff up here, it happens all the time :lol:

Fanforever · Post by **Fanforever** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:23 pm

SkinsJock wrote:Don't worry about the minor details - this is just a discussion - we are allowed to make stuff up here, it happens all the time

You're right, we are allowed to make stuff up that's why this board is always crowded with crud. Oh! by the way, trades and compensation involving trades is major.

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 8:38 pm

Fanforever wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:Don't worry about the minor details - this is just a discussion - we are allowed to make stuff up here, it happens all the time

You're right, we are allowed to make stuff up that's why this board is always crowded with crud. Oh! by the way, trades and compensation involving trades is major.

Not if it gets us a player that we really do not need :wink:

HEROHAMO · Post by **HEROHAMO** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 10:32 pm

I think u been smoking the sticky icky! :lol:

Fanforever · Post by **Fanforever** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 11:55 pm

HEROHAMO wrote:I think u been smoking the sticky icky!

I don't smoke period my man. Maybe you should try smoking something and you wouldn't find the need to try to be smart.

Fios · Post by **Fios** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:20 am

Fanforever wrote:
HEROHAMO wrote:I think u been smoking the sticky icky!

I don't smoke period my man. Maybe you should try smoking something and you wouldn't find the need to try to be smart.

Fanforever, he was kidding with you, please do not take every single response so personally.

redskins_89 · Post by **redskins_89** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:51 am

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:14 am

Fanforever wrote:I don't smoke period my man.

Did anyone else....

....ahh screw it, never mind.

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:13 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Fanforever wrote:I don't smoke period my man.

Did anyone else.... ....ahh screw it, never mind.

Chris - you are one sick puppy - but I think you already knew that :lol:

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:47 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Fanforever wrote:I don't smoke period my man.

Did anyone else.... ....ahh screw it, never mind.

That's just wrong... in so many ways! [-X

Fios · Post by **Fios** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:12 am

Folks, please stick to the topic at-hand

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Trade scenario!!!

Trade scenario!!!

Re: Trade scenario!!!

Re: Trade scenario!!!

Re: Trade scenario!!!

ok ok ok

Re: Trade scenario!!!

I think it is a great move, we could switch linebackers