The Future With Gregg Williams

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

Skinsfan55 wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
Houligan26 wrote:I think guys like Bill Belichek, these kind of things dont happen with him.

That's funny! We need to sign a PERFECT coach. And Bilicheck is perfect, mistakes don't happen with him. That's where we went wrong! I got it now.

ROTFALMAO

Oh, wait, you're serious aren't you?


Of course Belichek is not perfect... but he is both an excellent coach and a very good GM.

He does not seem to make personel mistakes on the same scale as the Redskins. He's not perfect, but he'd rather go for low cost-high reward types.

Sure, he built a pretty flimsy reciever corps this season, but he had some guys who might have blossomed, but flamed out... still, when is the last time the Patriots had a free agent bust?

Going to battle with such a poor set of recievers may have been a mistake (or they may have been the best the Pats could realistically acquire) but it didn't end up costing the Patriots very much at all. (I don't think poor recievers cost them a Superbowl bid.)

He said "I think guys like Bill Belichek, these kind of things dont happen with him." I responded appropriately to that.

OK, I agree Belicheck is a great coach. Let me see, how many active coaches have won 3 Superbowls. Let me see. Belicheck. I think there's one more. What's his name? It's on the tip of my tongue.......

And there are 32 teams, Belicheck coaches one of them. What does that mean? Everyone else is incompetent? We should pry him from the Partriots? We just go hire someone like him?

And why exactly is it assumed that Belicheck is the sole reason for the Partriots success? It's an entire organization. And if he's so great how come they have slipped the last couple years from their dominance winning 3 of 4?

BTW, the year after his first Superbowl win he didn't make the playoffs, lots of people on this site would have fired him then and not won the next two if we follow what they are saying that no bad season is forgivable.

Frankly these are lots of pointless questions to lots of pointless posts.
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

PulpExposure wrote:Their FA busts don't make national news because they usually go with low-cost contracts for them...

Actually, it is not national news becuase they don't have an owner who draws national attention and the press is lazy and piles on anything they can get on us. The Patriots are worshipped by the press and their mistakes are ignored. Some people don't look deeper then the lazy, superficial reporting and demonstrate that by blindly accepting the reporting rather then looking deeper.

Frankly, I don't have a problem with that. I am happy with that. We have a rich owner who is willing to spend anything and while still making mistakes is learning. Rather then the over the hill gang he's going for young players and long contracts to build the team. He's trusting his staff more. At least he's growing.

Steinbrenner and Jerry Jones both had lots of sucky teams before winning tons of championships. But I grew up in hopeless Lion country and would I prefer that to a rich guy willing to spend every dollar to win? Not a chance! Too many Skins fans are spoiled though. They point to the heydey of Cooke/Gibbs/Beathard and expect that all the time. They are dreaming.
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

Irn-Bru wrote:As for you sources on Archuleta, where did you read that he was letting other stuff (money, girls, cars, etc.?) distract him from where his focus should have been? I've never heard that story before.


Here is one source:

Continued Archuleta: "To come in here with the high profile situation that it was, I'm not used to that. I allowed that as well as other things to be a distraction. I let those things get in the way of what's important. That's the disappointment in myself that I feel."


"There's a lot of camouflage and disguise and window dressing but when you really strip it down it's fundamentals. As a player I made things more complex than they actually were, and that's my fault."


Said Archuleta: "There are a lot of parts to the equation, but at the end of the day it's my responsibility and it's up to me. When I'm on the field, I have to play well and I have a responsibility to myself and my teammates to make plays. Ultimately, the responsibility lies on my shoulders."


On that issue, Archuleta said: "Every player has strengths and weaknesses. In my opinion and in the opinion of a lot of other people, I excel underneath. A lot of people said, and I've come under a lot criticism over my career, that I can't cover, that I can't do this and I can't do that.

"Do I agree with it? No. Are there a lot of other safeties who are better in the passing game than me? Absolutely. Unfortunately, our secondary has given up some big plays this year and I've been a part of that. Ultimately, it's my responsibility."


The safety added: "As players and coaches, sometimes we make things more complex than they really are. The scheme [seems] really complex but in reality it's not--it's just fundamentals and basics.


There were several other articles about Arch's lack of focus and what caused his lack of focus. At least he takes the responsibility. I don't blame Gregg Williams for Arch's distractions or lack of focus in any way.

http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=21964
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

PulpExposure wrote:Instead of using big FA signings to improve their team, they use this thing called the draft to build depth. I like what I've heard about that thing called the draft. It sounds so...foreign. Maybe the Redskins might think about using it?


The Skins have. Let me share some of the draft picks with you.

Kili Lefotu, Sr., OG, Arizona
Kevin Simon, Sr., ILB, Tennessee
Manuel White, Jr., RB, UCLA
Robert McCune, LB, Louisville
Jared Newberry, LB, Stanford
Nehemiah Broughton, RB, The Citadel
Jim Molinaro, OL, Notre Dame
Taylor Jacobs, WR, Florida
Gibran Hamdan, QB, Indiana
Patrick Ramsey, QB, Tulane
Rashad Bauman, CB, Oregon
Cliff Russell, WR, Utah
Andre Lott, S, Tennessee
Robert Royal, TE, LSU
Reggie Coleman, T, Tennessee
Jeff Grau, LS, UCLA
Greg Scott, DE, Hampton
Rod Gardner, WR, Clemson
Fred Smoot, CB, Mississippi St.
Sage Rosenfels, QB, Iowa St.
Darnerien McCants, WR, Delaware St.
Mario Monds, DT, Cincinnati
LaVar Arrington, LB, Penn St.
Lloyd Harrison, CB, N.C. State
Michael Moore, G, Troy St.
Quincy Sanders, S, UNLV
Todd Husak, QB, Stanford
Del Cowsette, DT, Maryland
Ethan Howell, WR, Oklahoma St.
Nate Stimson, LB, Georgia Tech
Derek Smith, OL, Virginia Tech
Jeff Hall, K, Tennessee
Tim Alexander, WR, Oregon St.
Stephen Alexander, TE, Oklahoma
Skip Hicks, RB, UCLA
Shawn Barber, LB, Richmond
Mark Fischer, C, Purdue
Pat Palmer, WR, Northwestern St.
David Terrell, CB, UTEP
Antwaune Ponds, LB, Syracuse


I guess we'd have a handful of Super Bowls by now if we relied solely on the draft.

My point? It should be a good balance of both, the draft AND free agency. I seriously doubt we could have molded all these guys into Pro Bowl players.
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

SkinsFreak wrote:
I guess we'd have a handful of Super Bowls by now if we relied solely on the draft.

My point? It should be a good balance of both, the draft AND free agency. I seriously doubt we could have molded all these guys into Pro Bowl players.


You completely missed the point. Most of those guys you mentioned were late round picks. In the late rounds it's a total crapshoot and you pretty much go solely on physical skills as your judge.

It's important to use a mix like you said... but you implied that the Redskins have used the draft as a tool for roster building, and I don't think they really have, they always just trade or forfeit their picks.
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

Skinsfan55 wrote:
SkinsFreak wrote:
I guess we'd have a handful of Super Bowls by now if we relied solely on the draft.

My point? It should be a good balance of both, the draft AND free agency. I seriously doubt we could have molded all these guys into Pro Bowl players.


You completely missed the point. Most of those guys you mentioned were late round picks. In the late rounds it's a total crapshoot and you pretty much go solely on physical skills as your judge.

It's important to use a mix like you said... but you implied that the Redskins have used the draft as a tool for roster building, and I don't think they really have, they always just trade or forfeit their picks.


:roll: No, YOU missed the point.

Where did I say the Skins use the draft for roster building? Review the list again, not all were late round picks.

:roll: I can't believe I have to explain this to you. My point was to say that you can't rely solely on the draft to better your team. You have to pick up some free agents. Why do you think the NFL ownership wanted free agency? And just because a few players didn't work out for this team, doesn't mean that acquiring players through free agency is a poor philosophy.

BTW - When did we forfeit any draft picks? That implies we got nothing in return.
PulpExposure
Pushing Paper
Pushing Paper
Posts: 4860
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:01 pm

Post by PulpExposure »

SkinsFreak wrote:[My point was to say that you can't rely solely on the draft to better your team. You have to pick up some free agents. Why do you think the NFL ownership wanted free agency? And just because a few players didn't work out for this team, doesn't mean that acquiring players through free agency is a poor philosophy.


Of course you can't rely on just one or the other. Thanks for stating the blindly obvious.

However, the Redskins de-emphasize using draft picks, and virtually give away many high round picks. Brandon Lloyd for a 3rd and 4th? TJ Duckett for a 3rd (and possibly 4th)? Trading a 2nd to move up to pick Rocky McIntosh? Trading a 1st & others to move up to pick Jason Campbell? Trading a 2nd along with Bailey for Portis?

All of those draft picks you look at as potential starters, especially the 2nd and 3rd rounders. Or at the very least, they're depth.

The way the Skins work is that we have a very talented starting team, with virtually no depth behind it. This isn't the NBA; you are almost guarenteed to get injuries. So when Shaun Springs & Carlos Rogers go down, we're forced to rely on other teams castoffs instead of maybe having some young players that can use the experience to learn for the future.

Look at it this way. Our offensive line made it through this year basically healthy. That's unheard of. We can't expect that for next year...but who are the depth players at tackle and guard for us next year? Castoffs.

Think if Chris Samuels or Jon Jansen goes down, our season isn't screwed?
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

PulpExposure wrote:Of course you can't rely on just one or the other. Thanks for stating the blindly obvious.


I know, sorry. But Skinsfan55 has to have every little thing spelled out for him, as the 'obvious' routinely escapes him. Sorry you had to waste your time reading that. I was attempting to shed some light for someone who appears to live in the dark, and most likely alone. :P
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

PulpExposure wrote:Think if Chris Samuels or Jon Jansen goes down, our season isn't screwed?

Jansen went down last year and a "cast-off free agent" stepped right in and the team never missed a beat. had this happen early in the season I don't know if the results would have been the same. Betts was drafted by the Skins and stepped in when Portis (a guy we traded picks for) went down. So the team does use all avenues to get players and all types are used to fill out the roster.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
PulpExposure
Pushing Paper
Pushing Paper
Posts: 4860
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:01 pm

Post by PulpExposure »

1niksder wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:Think if Chris Samuels or Jon Jansen goes down, our season isn't screwed?

Jansen went down last year and a "cast-off free agent" stepped right in and the team never missed a beat.


We were butt lucky to get Todd Wade, and you know it. Remember what happened when Randy Thomas got injured in 2005? Then our 40 year old backup Ray Brown got injured?

Betts was drafted by the Skins.


Back when we weren't actively trading draft picks like we have been. Different situation.

Under Gibbs we've had a grand total of 1 2nd round pick (Rocky McIntosh). Assuming we keep our current draft picks, we'll have had in 4 years:

4 1st rounders (full complement!), 1 2nd rounder (missing 3), 1 3rd rounder (missing 3), 1 4th rounder (also missing 3). Out of a potential 16 first day draft picks, we'll have exercised exactly 7.

Look at who we got out of those 6. The 1st upcoming this year is unknown, yes. But we got Carlos Rogers, Jason Campbell, Sean Taylor, Rocky McIntosh, Chris Cooley, and Manuel White. That's 5 starters, and only 1 bust. It seems like we have a pretty good return rate on draft picks, so you would think the Skins would try to draft as much as possible. But...

The Skins are the only team that surrenders draft picks like this, especially the valuable first day picks. Teams like the Chargers, Steelers, Ravens, Patriots and Eagles that value draft picks (and draft well...) happen to be perennially good teams.

If I forgot to mention, we're also one of the worst franchises in the NFL.

Is there a correlation? I tend to think so.
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

SkinsFreak wrote:
Skinsfan55 wrote:
SkinsFreak wrote:
I guess we'd have a handful of Super Bowls by now if we relied solely on the draft.

My point? It should be a good balance of both, the draft AND free agency. I seriously doubt we could have molded all these guys into Pro Bowl players.


You completely missed the point. Most of those guys you mentioned were late round picks. In the late rounds it's a total crapshoot and you pretty much go solely on physical skills as your judge.

It's important to use a mix like you said... but you implied that the Redskins have used the draft as a tool for roster building, and I don't think they really have, they always just trade or forfeit their picks.


:roll: No, YOU missed the point.

Where did I say the Skins use the draft for roster building? Review the list again, not all were late round picks.

:roll: I can't believe I have to explain this to you. My point was to say that you can't rely solely on the draft to better your team. You have to pick up some free agents. Why do you think the NFL ownership wanted free agency? And just because a few players didn't work out for this team, doesn't mean that acquiring players through free agency is a poor philosophy.

BTW - When did we forfeit any draft picks? That implies we got nothing in return.


Here we go again, another post where words are put into someone's mouth:

1.) Obviously you can't rely solely on the draft as I myself have said many times. Free agency is secondary to the draft when it comes to proper team building though IMO. You draft well and fill the cracks with veteran role players and the occasional star.

2.) You forfeit (perhaps surrender is a better word) when you sign restricted free agents. We gave up tons of picks when we signed guys like Coles and other RFA's.
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

PulpExposure wrote:
1niksder wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:Think if Chris Samuels or Jon Jansen goes down, our season isn't screwed?

Jansen went down last year and a "cast-off free agent" stepped right in and the team never missed a beat.


We were butt lucky to get Todd Wade, and you know it. Remember what happened when Randy Thomas got injured in 2005? Then our 40 year old backup Ray Brown got injured?

Remember why they had to step up and play... because the Jim Molinaro (our draft pick) wasn't ready. We got lucky? How? we signed a guy in the off-season to back up the tackle spot. When a tackle went own the guy signed to play stepped up and did hid job. How is that lucky?

PulpExposure wrote:
Betts was drafted by the Skins.


Back when we weren't actively trading draft picks like we have been. Different situation.

My bad I didn't know we where talking about a specific time frame. Would Dock count as a starter that was drafted or was that outside the the timeframe?

PulpExposure wrote:Under Gibbs we've had a grand total of 1 2nd round pick (Rocky McIntosh). Assuming we keep our current draft picks, we'll have had in 4 years:

4 1st rounders (full complement!), 1 2nd rounder (missing 3), 1 3rd rounder (missing 3), 1 4th rounder (also missing 3). Out of a potential 16 first day draft picks, we'll have exercised exactly 7.

So it's obvious that the team targets players in the first round and look for depth later in the draft.

PulpExposure wrote:Look at who we got out of those 6. The 1st upcoming this year is unknown, yes. But we got Carlos Rogers, Jason Campbell, Sean Taylor, Rocky McIntosh, Chris Cooley, and Manuel White. That's 5 starters, and only 1 bust. It seems like we have a pretty good return rate on draft picks, so you would think the Skins would try to draft as much as possible. But...

That's five starters coming out of three drafts, What the problem is?

PulpExposure wrote:The Skins are the only team that surrenders draft picks like this, especially the valuable first day picks. Teams like the Chargers, Steelers, Ravens, Patriots and Eagles that value draft picks (and draft well...) happen to be perennially good teams.

All the teams you mentioned did it their way yet they will and their fans will be watching the big game tomorrow right alone with the rest of us.

PulpExposure wrote:If I forgot to mention, we're also one of the worst franchises in the NFL.

Actually there are 5 teams drafting in front of the Skins, this is because they had a worst year than the Skins

PulpExposure wrote:Is there a correlation?

I was going to ask you the same thing.

PulpExposure wrote:I tend to think so.

I don't and throwing teams out there that you say build through the draft unless you can point to players that are producing year in and year out. By your own standard you'll have to come up with a team that has produced 5 starters (from the draft) in the last 3 years and rounds 4 through 7 can't be considered. Has far as Free Agents go the Skins have brought in quite a few but most have contributed.
The fact that guys brought in to be backup and play only in certain situation were forced to start is missed by so many is amazing.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

PulpExposure,

I wouldn't consider 4 first rounders to be a full compliment since we had two in 2005 and none at all in the last draft.
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

Skinsfan55 wrote:PulpExposure,

I wouldn't consider 4 first rounders to be a full compliment since we had two in 2005 and none at all in the last draft.

Averages 1 per year, that would be a full compliment.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

1niksder wrote:
Skinsfan55 wrote:PulpExposure,

I wouldn't consider 4 first rounders to be a full compliment since we had two in 2005 and none at all in the last draft.

Averages 1 per year, that would be a full compliment.


I know that we've had an average of one a year, but since the Redskins have not had first round picks in EVERY year of the second coming of Gibbs I wouldn't count it as a full compliment. (Even though, didn't we trade our 2006 pick for the second 2005 pick?)

In any case, haven't Gibbs and Co always operated this way? The Redskins went 7 years between first round picks in the mid 80's to early 90's. In fact, of Joe Gibbs' 12 years (granted, he was not the general manager) the Redskins made 3 first round selections.

Gibbs is just going with what he knows.
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
PulpExposure
Pushing Paper
Pushing Paper
Posts: 4860
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:01 pm

Post by PulpExposure »

I don't mind we sign FA. I'd just like us to use the draft picks more intelligently than trading them away. I mean our production from Duckett and Lloyd was pretty non-existant. I'm sure we could have gotten a 3rd round rookie to get us the zero TDs we got from Lloyd.

The bigger problem is that we have to draft for need, instead of drafting for depth. See below at the Giants and Eagles...they are drafting the future replacements for people like Strahan and William Thomas. That's a nice luxury.

An example is...who are our replacements for Jansen and Samuels? If one goes down with a career injury this year...we either spend next years first for his replacement (and rush a rookie into the lineup), or we sign an expensive free agent (if there's someone of equal quality on the free agent market, which I'd doubt).

1niksder wrote:[We got lucky? How? we signed a guy in the off-season to back up the tackle spot. When a tackle went own the guy signed to play stepped up and did hid job. How is that lucky?


Wade was a former starter, who was released by the Texans really late in the game (July 14th). Late enough in training camp that not many teams would sign him to start. We can't count every year on signing quality people like him. Imho we got lucky. We usually fill our depth with people like our current backup to Dock, some guy named Taylor Whitney. Someone cut from another team because they aren't good enough to play for them. Leftovers.

My bad I didn't know we where talking about a specific time frame. Would Dock count as a starter that was drafted or was that outside the the timeframe?


Alas, outside the timeframe.

So it's obvious that the team targets players in the first round and look for depth later in the draft.


Except we get very little depth from later in the draft. Most of our players we draft in the 5-7 range don't stick. In 2004, we drafted Wilson in the 6th and Molinaro in the 7th. Wilson is gone. In 2005, we drafted McCune in the 5th, Newberry in the 6th, and Broughton in the 7th.

Where's the depth?

That's five starters coming out of three drafts, What the problem is?


My point there is they've been good at picking players imho when they have the higher draft picks. So keep them!

All the teams you mentioned did it their way yet they will and their fans will be watching the big game tomorrow right alone with the rest of us.


Oh come on. Is it really Superbowl win or nothing for you? I mean, do you consider the Redskins 5-11 season the same as the Chargers season, just because the Chargers didn't win to the Superbowl?

PulpExposure wrote:
If I forgot to mention, we're also one of the worst franchises in the NFL.

Actually there are 5 teams drafting in front of the Skins, this is because they had a worst year than the Skins


Which is why I said one of the worst. I did not make the statement we're the worst. There's a reason why we were in the position to draft Sean Taylor, Samuels, Arrington, Bailey, Rogers, and whomever this year. :wink:

By your own standard you'll have to come up with a team that has produced 5 starters (from the draft) in the last 3 years and rounds 4 through 7 can't be considered.


Rounds 5-7. I count round 4 since you still tend to get a lot of talent out of it. And I don't know if I'd count Rocky, since he only started what, 2 games? Let's call it 4 starters and 1 part time starter.

Okay, let's see, keeping it to rounds 1-4.

Let's try in our own division.

Giants: Generally a team that drafts decently.

In 2006, they drafted Kiwanuka, Moss, Gerris Wilkinson, Barry Cofield, and Guy Whimper. Kiwanuka started 9 games for them, Cofield started for them all year, Wilkinson started two games.

In 2005, they drafted Corey Webster (starter), Justin Tuck, and Brandon Jacobs in their top 4 picks. Webster starts, and Jacobs will start for Barber next year. In 2004, they drafted Eli Manning, Chris Snee, and Reggie Torbor. Manning and Snee start, and Torbor started 3 games at LB for them.

Out of their last 3 drafts rounds 1-4, they have 4 full time starters and 4 part time starters. But they also drafted future replacements for older players like Kiwanuka, Brandon Jacobs, Sinorice Moss, and Gerris Wilkerson.

Cowboys: I don't anticipate many starters, since Parcells is a veteran-friendly coach. Let's see:

In 2006, they drafted Carpenter, Fasano, Hatcher and Skylar Green. Out of that group, Carpenter started once, Fasano started 5 times, and Hatcher didn't start (but played DE in 14 games).

In 2005, they drafted Demarcus Ware, Marcus Spears, Kevin Burnett, Marion Barber, and Chris Canty in the 1st-4th rounds. Right there, you have Ware, Spears, and Canty as starters, and both Burnett and Barber play a heck of a lot (Barber had 10 TDs this year).

In 2004, they drafted Julius Jones, Jacob Rogers, Stephan Peterman, and Bruce Thornton.

Looks like 4 starters, and 3 players with significant playing time. The 2004 draft looked like a total bust though...except for Julius Jones. That they wasted their draft makes me happy.

Eagles: This is where I anticipate a pretty high number. Let's see if that number bears out.

In 2006, the Eagles drafted Broderick Bunkley, Winston Justice, Chris Gocong, Max Jean-Giles, and Jason Avant. This was a draft for the future, as Bunkley didn't play much, and Justice and Jean-Giles are their replacements for LT and RG respectively. Avant played a little.

2005, the Eagles drafted Mike Patterson, Reggie Brown, Matt McCoy, Ryan Moats, Sean Considine, and Todd Herremans. Patterson, Herremans, Considine and Brown started all year, McCoy started 10 games. Moats sits on the bench iirc.

2004, the Eagles drafted Shawn Andrews, Matt Ware, JR Reed and Trey Darilek. Andrews made the ProBowl, rest aren't on the team afaik.

So, they got 6 starters, and a heck of a lot of depth from their latest draft (especially on the offensive line). And their second future DT if Bunkley ever lives up to his 1st round billing.

So, since i"m curious, I'll take a look at the Chargers.

In 2006, the Chargers drafted Cromartie, Marcus McNeill, and Charlie Whitehurst (now that's a wierd pick). McNeill starts for them, Cromartie got significant playing time.

In 2005, the Chargers got Merriman, Castillo, Vincent Jackson, and Darren Sproles. Merriman and Castillo start, Jackson plays quite a bit (27 catches and 6 TDs).

In 2004, the Chargers got Phillip Rivers, Olshansky, Nate Kaeding, Hardwick, and Shaun Phillips. All start.

So, they got 8 starters (including 5 probowl players...and Shaun Phillips didn't make it with 11.5 sacks), and 2 contributors.

Drafting like this allows you to build depth, and draft for the future (like the Eagles picking Justice to eventually replace William Thomas). Drafting like we do, means we take whomever can fit in our biggest hole...and then scrambling to fill our roster afterwards. If we still had our 2nd this year (or even our 3rd or 4th!), we could look at picking a DE and then maybe a corner, but now we're forced to go the free agent route for one of them and hope it works out.
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

This thread was about Williams, NOT the draft. :roll:

However, this thread has become absolutely ridiculous. Relying solely on the draft is a stupid argument and relying solely on free agency is also stupid. Need to have good balance of both.

Let's take a look at a few free agents currently on the roster:

Lloyd, ARE, Griffin, Washington, Randy Thomas, Rabach, Thrash, Wade, Duckett (ya, I know, but still a 1st rounder and a good player), Albright, Prioleau, Salave'a, Sellers, Springs... just to name a few.

Are you people saying that we'd be better off today if we hadn't signed these guys? Are you people saying that you'd rather have some 3rd string guy, picked in the 4th round for depth, than say... Marcus Washington or Shawn Springs??? Our team would be better off???? If that were the case, you same people would be saying, "our owner is rich, so why the hell don't we sign some impact players who can start immediately and help our team now, rather than in 7 years?" :roll:

Philly has taken a TON of players in the draft the past few years, a TON. How many can you name and how many are Pro Bowlers, and how many Lombardi trophies do they have?
Draft_Net101
piglet
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 2:23 am

Post by Draft_Net101 »

Williams is a HORRIBLE head coach, and if he ever gets a HC job I hope its with the fish. He builds real good defenses, but has no idea about anything offense. I don't think he had one good offense throughout his entire tenure in buffalo.
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

Draft_Net101 wrote:Williams is a HORRIBLE head coach, and if he ever gets a HC job I hope its with the fish. He builds real good defenses, but has no idea about anything offense. I don't think he had one good offense throughout his entire tenure in buffalo.


Hey Draft_Net101, welcome to the discussion.

Williams has no idea about anything to do with offense? I'm not sure I totally agree with that. Defensive coaches have to study offenses to learn and develop ways to stop them, and vice-versa for offensive coaches. So I wouldn't say he has "no idea about offense". Which coaches in the league are experts at both offense and defense??? That's why they ALL have offensive and defensive coordinators.
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

1niksder wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
Betts was drafted by the Skins.


Back when we weren't actively trading draft picks like we have been. Different situation.

My bad I didn't know we where talking about a specific time frame. Would Dock count as a starter that was drafted or was that outside the the timeframe?


You seem to be implying that PulpExposure is cherry picking his time frame... but Dockery and Betts were both drafted by Steve Spurrier... were they not?

One would argue though that the Redskins were actively trading or surrendering draft picks in 2003 though, since we signed Laveranues Coles, Chad Morton, John Hall and Randy Thomas some of which cost us draft picks.

Still, to get back on track... this thread is about Williams and his ability to be a head coach. He has very little history of signing players since he worked under a GM previously, and we are not certain that he has 100% control over signings with the Redskins despite the language in his contract (I am sure the Danny still has a lot of pull.)

All we really know about Gregg Williams is that he can get the most out of his defensive players. It also seems to me that he doesn't have a very flashy defensive scheme (not many huge interception or sack numbers) but his teams have been very smart, and controlled... careful not to give up big plays.

The true measure of a Head Coach is different though. Yeah, his scheme is still important, but his motivational tactics become much more important... his interview skills, his eye for fellow coaching talent, etc.

Does he seem like he can handle these things? Who will be the offensive coordinator who will stay with him and help us be a more multidimentional team? Saunders seems too proud to keep working under Williams if he's appointed head coach...

In any case, we can't look into the crystal ball and say if Williams will be a great coach or not... but we can look at past evidence. Still, it could all be a disaster like it was when we moved Pettibon to head coach when Gibbs retired.

I just wish there was more out there on Gregg Williams.
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
PulpExposure
Pushing Paper
Pushing Paper
Posts: 4860
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:01 pm

Post by PulpExposure »

SkinsFreak wrote:Are you people saying that we'd be better off today if we hadn't signed these guys? Are you people saying that you'd rather have some 3rd string guy, picked in the 4th round for depth, than say... Marcus Washington or Shawn Springs??? Our team would be better off???? If that were the case, you same people would be saying, "our owner is rich, so why the hell don't we sign some impact players who can start immediately and help our team now, rather than in 7 years?" :roll:


Perhaps you need to take some reading comprehension classes. I've repeatedly said (as has everyone else) you use both tools given to build a team. The Redskins don't use the draft very well. And it hurts us.

Just to reiterate something I said in the previous post:

I don't mind we sign FA. I'd just like us to use the draft picks more intelligently than trading them away.


But you all are right, this is about GW. My apologies for the derail.
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

PulpExposure wrote:
SkinsFreak wrote:Are you people saying that we'd be better off today if we hadn't signed these guys? Are you people saying that you'd rather have some 3rd string guy, picked in the 4th round for depth, than say... Marcus Washington or Shawn Springs??? Our team would be better off???? If that were the case, you same people would be saying, "our owner is rich, so why the hell don't we sign some impact players who can start immediately and help our team now, rather than in 7 years?" :roll:


Perhaps you need to take some reading comprehension classes. I've repeatedly said (as has everyone else) you use both tools given to build a team. The Redskins don't use the draft very well. And it hurts us.

Just to reiterate something I said in the previous post:

I don't mind we sign FA. I'd just like us to use the draft picks more intelligently than trading them away.


But you all are right, this is about GW. My apologies for the derail.


I didn't really mean you, just as a general comment. But you are right, we do trade away a lot of picks and the draft hasn't been so kind to us over the past decade.
Draft_Net101
piglet
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 2:23 am

Post by Draft_Net101 »

SkinsFreak wrote:
Draft_Net101 wrote:Williams is a HORRIBLE head coach, and if he ever gets a HC job I hope its with the fish. He builds real good defenses, but has no idea about anything offense. I don't think he had one good offense throughout his entire tenure in buffalo.


Hey Draft_Net101, welcome to the discussion.

Williams has no idea about anything to do with offense? I'm not sure I totally agree with that. Defensive coaches have to study offenses to learn and develop ways to stop them, and vice-versa for offensive coaches. So I wouldn't say he has "no idea about offense". Which coaches in the league are experts at both offense and defense??? That's why they ALL have offensive and defensive coordinators.

I had to live with him as buffalo's coach for 3 years, trust me. He may know how to stop an offense, but he sure can't run one.
Post Reply