SCSkinsFan wrote:So, now that the game is over and the Skins have pulled out a 17 - 13, what say you now RIC?
I responded here:
http://www.the-hogs.net/forum/viewtopic. ... 245#294245
SCSkinsFan wrote:So, now that the game is over and the Skins have pulled out a 17 - 13, what say you now RIC?
Champsturf wrote:SkinzCanes wrote:LOL.....touche' I was referring to yards and such, but I'll accept your stats...lol
I didn't mean to be nitpicky. I'm just really impressed with JC so far. I was one of the people calling for him to start out of training camp but I never thought that he would do this well in his first two NFL starts. The way he bounced back after that int really says a lot about him.
Oh, I know. You and I have been on the same page since August. But then again, we were the jerks wanting Brunell out from under center. I'm not saying we were right (we won't KNOW for quite some time), but it sure looks promising.
I did not think they could pull it off, but Campbell was solid...
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:I did not think they could pull it off, but Campbell was solid...
I like the kid, and I'm glad he was able to help the team win in the end, but he made too many errant throws yesterday (AT HOME) to really say he was "solid".
I arrived at the start of the 2nd quarter. I heard he had a good scramble in the first which lit up the crowd, but from what I witnessed, he still has to hone in the cannon of an arm he has.
Of course, it IS his second start, and I'm gladd he's a .500 QB for his career. However, I was more impressed by his performance in Tampa than what he did yesterday.
Mursilis wrote:REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:I did not think they could pull it off, but Campbell was solid...
I like the kid, and I'm glad he was able to help the team win in the end, but he made too many errant throws yesterday (AT HOME) to really say he was "solid".
True, but how long has he had to work on his timing with his receivers? If these issues continue next season, we should be concerned, but I think his accuracy will pick up with time. I believe he said the season-long completion percentage record his senior year at Auburn. Having a cannon of an arm is worthless if a QB can't be accurate, but I think that with time, JC will demonstrate power and accuracy.
USAFSkinFan wrote:I'm sorry but the play calling is still handcuffing this offense... we're lucky we had field position on our side for a lot of that game because otherwise thows 3-and-outs early in the game would have killed us... the wide receiver screen, the shovel pass, the reverse... all stuffed... those are things you do when you've established your offense and the defense is on their heels, not when you're struggling just to get a first down... and those short yardage stiuations were terrible uninspired play calling... maybe it's just me, but if we don't open some things up we're doomed to repeat the first half of the season... (I will say that Carolina's play calling was even worse than ours though...)
xhadow wrote:Mursilis wrote:REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:I did not think they could pull it off, but Campbell was solid...
I like the kid, and I'm glad he was able to help the team win in the end, but he made too many errant throws yesterday (AT HOME) to really say he was "solid".
True, but how long has he had to work on his timing with his receivers? If these issues continue next season, we should be concerned, but I think his accuracy will pick up with time. I believe he said the season-long completion percentage record his senior year at Auburn. Having a cannon of an arm is worthless if a QB can't be accurate, but I think that with time, JC will demonstrate power and accuracy.
Not to mention how many dropped passes our receivers had yesterday. I mean there were a few that would have went for touchdowns.
Mursilis wrote:USAFSkinFan wrote:I'm sorry but the play calling is still handcuffing this offense... we're lucky we had field position on our side for a lot of that game because otherwise thows 3-and-outs early in the game would have killed us... the wide receiver screen, the shovel pass, the reverse... all stuffed... those are things you do when you've established your offense and the defense is on their heels, not when you're struggling just to get a first down... and those short yardage stiuations were terrible uninspired play calling... maybe it's just me, but if we don't open some things up we're doomed to repeat the first half of the season... (I will say that Carolina's play calling was even worse than ours though...)
Obviously, a lot of the playcalling is going to be limited by the fact we're working a new QB into the offense. It should get better with time. I see Campbell, and by extension the passing game, having a much better year next year, after he's had a full offseason and training camp as the starter.
1fan4ramsey wrote:While Campbell didn't set the world on fire he made a couple of key plays that Brunell wouldn't have been able to make.
Chris Luva Luva wrote:1) With JC in, we're seeing the ball spread around.
2) No more throws to Moss who is being covered by 4 defenders.
3) Our TE's are getting more touches.
4) We're getting a deep ball threat.
5) We're getting a more mobile QB. (numbers added by me)
Chris Luva Luva wrote:With JC in, we're seeing the ball spread around. No more throws to Moss who is being covered by 4 defenders. Our TE's are getting more touches. We're getting a deep ball threat. We're getting a more mobile QB.
I don't know if I'm ready to believe that. For the most part, it looked like the same offense under Brunell, only with a taller QB.
Like you said, Campbell didn't light it up, but he certainly made a few key plays.
Now, I'm excited about the kid delivering a win as well, but if you were to change the number on the jersey, it wouldn't look too different of an output, IMO. (right down to the restlessness in the stands, and the calls for Joe to retire, streaming down from the "experts" in the Upper Level)
SkinzCanes wrote:I don't know if I'm ready to believe that. For the most part, it looked like the same offense under Brunell, only with a taller QB.
Like you said, Campbell didn't light it up, but he certainly made a few key plays.
Now, I'm excited about the kid delivering a win as well, but if you were to change the number on the jersey, it wouldn't look too different of an output, IMO. (right down to the restlessness in the stands, and the calls for Joe to retire, streaming down from the "experts" in the Upper Level)
I don't think that Brunell would've been able to make any of the throws that JC has for td's. Maybe the one toey but I doubt that Brunell would've stepped up in the pocket the way JC did.
The biggest difference between JC and Brunell is the fact that JC will stand in the pocket, look downfield, and stand in there despite the rush. When he leaves the pocket he has a chance to actually complete a pass, unlike Brunell who would just toss the ball out of bounds. Unlike JC, Brunell had happy feet and left the pocket WAY too soon or threw the ball away. And even though JC and his receivers couldn't connect early in the game , the threat of the downfield pass kept the Panthers from stacking the line, thereby allowing Duckett and Betts to run effectively.