lavar arrington

gibbs#1 · Post by **gibbs#1** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:57 pm

SLOWLY BUT SURELY I'M STARTING TO REALIZE THAT GETTING RID OF LAVAR WAS A REALLY SMART MOVE . I WAS A HUGE LAVAR FAN, BUT HE HAS DONE NOTHING THIS YEAR AND THAT KNEE DOESN'T LOOK LIKE IT WILL EVER BE A HUNDRED% WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK

Jake · Post by **Jake** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 8:05 pm

I THINK THERE MIGHT BE PLENTY OF MR. NICKELS THREADS AT ES.

Hoss · Post by **Hoss** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 8:07 pm

ITHINKMAYBETHISISINTHEWRONGFORUM.IFYOUCHECKOUTAROUNDTHELEAGUEYOUWILLSEEAFEWTHREADSABOUTLAVAR.

HEROHAMO · Post by **HEROHAMO** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:38 am

Heck NO!! Man I almost got over us getting rid of Lavar and Bam someone has to bring it back up. Any how no way was it a good move! The weak side is definately still a weakness. Our D is still a strong unit but definately not the same without Lavar. I still cry when I see him in G men uniform. Gosh Darnit Fooey !! Dang I miss Lavar. Any how our offense seems to be forming into a potent bunch! A smell a return of the fun bunch!

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:30 am

HEROHAMO wrote:Any how no way was it a good move! The weak side is definately still a weakness. Our D is still a strong unit but definately not the same without Lavar.

I disagree, tottally. Holdman has been doing exceptionally well this year. Nobody wants to give the guy his props.

Everyone said LA would tear it up in NY and he's done exactly what he has done here in the past 2 years, squat.

Thanks for the memories.
Thanks for the cap space.
Aside from that, good riddens you interdivisional rival, I hope you continue to underachieve for your new team.

He's playing so far under the radar that even the media has forgotten about him being a redskin. Its Wednesday and there is absolutely no hype on redskins.com, THN, ESPN, SI, Fox. There was more hype for AP's revenge than LA. :wink:

joebagadonuts · Post by **joebagadonuts** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:29 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:I disagree, tottally. Holdman has been doing exceptionally well this year. Nobody wants to give the guy his props.

His run stopping has been great, his coverage somewhat suspect, from what I've noticed.

EDIT: SORRY, WAS I SUPPOSED TO TYPE IN ALL CAPS?

Fios · Post by **Fios** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:33 am

WHAT?

tazlah · Post by **tazlah** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:48 am

WHY IS EVERYONE YELLING?????

OH... AND YES... I THINK GETTING RID OF LAVAR WAS IN OUR BEST INTEREST.

my head hurts now from all this yelling

cleg · Post by **cleg** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:57 am

tazlah wrote:WHY IS EVERYONE YELLING?????

OH... AND YES... I THINK GETTING RID OF LAVAR WAS IN OUR BEST INTEREST.

my head hurts now from all this yelling

I like Lavar - he is a beautiful human being.

SkinsFreak · Post by **SkinsFreak** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:12 am

MISS LAVAR??? I DON'T THINK SO!!!

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:26 am

Jackson wrote:"OH NO YOU DID'EEENT!!!!!!!!!!"

*inside joke

joeramse · Post by **joeramse** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:52 pm

Lavar has Redskin for life status in my book. I just hope he doesn't take his anger out on Brunell though.

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:57 pm

What or who is a "Lavar" :?:

cleg · Post by **cleg** » Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:24 pm

Did you see the Shawn Springs quote about Lavar today? He was asked wheter the Skins were worried that Lavar might tip the Gints off to the Skins defensive playbook and Springs replied that when he was here Lavar did not know that many of the plays so no, he was not worried.

HEROHAMO · Post by **HEROHAMO** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:10 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
HEROHAMO wrote:Any how no way was it a good move! The weak side is definately still a weakness. Our D is still a strong unit but definately not the same without Lavar.

I disagree, tottally. Holdman has been doing exceptionally well this year. Nobody wants to give the guy his props.

Everyone said LA would tear it up in NY and he's done exactly what he has done here in the past 2 years, squat.

Thanks for the memories.
Thanks for the cap space.
Aside from that, good riddens you interdivisional rival, I hope you continue to underachieve for your new team.

He's playing so far under the radar that even the media has forgotten about him being a redskin. Its Wednesday and there is absolutely no hype on redskins.com, THN, ESPN, SI, Fox. There was more hype for AP's revenge than LA.

Ha! Holdman is okay at best. He definatly is no Lavar!

Punu · Post by **Punu** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:10 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
HEROHAMO wrote:Any how no way was it a good move! The weak side is definately still a weakness. Our D is still a strong unit but definately not the same without Lavar.

I disagree, tottally. Holdman has been doing exceptionally well this year. Nobody wants to give the guy his props.

Everyone said LA would tear it up in NY and he's done exactly what he has done here in the past 2 years, squat.

Thanks for the memories.
Thanks for the cap space.
Aside from that, good riddens you interdivisional rival, I hope you continue to underachieve for your new team.

He's playing so far under the radar that even the media has forgotten about him being a redskin. Its Wednesday and there is absolutely no hype on redskins.com, THN, ESPN, SI, Fox. There was more hype for AP's revenge than LA.

you concern yourself with media and hype too much. he was still a good "loose cannon" in my book. One weak side I would pick over almost anyone else.

SkinsChic · Post by **SkinsChic** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:44 am

cleg wrote:Did you see the Shawn Springs quote about Lavar today? He was asked wheter the Skins were worried that Lavar might tip the Gints off to the Skins defensive playbook and Springs replied that when he was here Lavar did not know that many of the plays so no, he was not worried.

The quote evidently got back to Lavar - I saw an interview with him on channel 4 last night and he said although he may not know much of the book (maybe 2 minutes or so) he's sure that Coach Coughlin (sp) will know what he's reading.

Irn-Bru · Post by **Irn-Bru** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:04 pm

HEROHAMO wrote: Ha! Holdman is okay at best. He definatly is no Lavar!

Williams has sounded pretty high on Holdman in recent press conferences. And guess who is our leading tackler right now?

Edit: I just checked the stats. . .and Holdman is not leading tackles. Gregg Williams seemed to think that he was, though. . . :hmm:

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:38 pm

Holdman has almost twice as many as Lavar