Brett Favre

HEROHAMO · Post by **HEROHAMO** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:02 am

Rumors are that Brett would consider leaving Green Bay and playing for another team. I am all for picking him up next year for the one two years he has left. If he leaves that it is.

SkinsChic · Post by **SkinsChic** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:53 am

He should consider leaving football altogether. He's done...was done last season and needs to admit his run is over.

1fan4ramsey · Post by **1fan4ramsey** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:12 am

I actually heard on a Sunday morning radio show (I believe Inside the NFL) that the Skins were considering trading for him in soon. Yikes

Mursilis · Post by **Mursilis** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:03 am

1fan4ramsey wrote:I actually heard on a Sunday morning radio show (I believe Inside the NFL) that the Skins were considering trading for him in soon. Yikes

Yikes indeed. Don't we already have 2 veteran QBs whose best days are behind them?!?! Do we really need a third?!? And at what point do we play JC if we bring in Farve - that move makes no sense (unless of course they'll take Brunell in a straight-up trade. I'd do that deal in a minute. I'm not sure how much of an upgrade Farve is at this point over Brunell, but he's definitely an upgrade.).

SkinsChic · Post by **SkinsChic** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:10 am

1fan4ramsey wrote:I actually heard on a Sunday morning radio show (I believe Inside the NFL) that the Skins were considering trading for him in soon. Yikes

Please say you're KIDDING !

USAFSkinFan · Post by **USAFSkinFan** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:12 am

not gonna happen...

redskindave · Post by **redskindave** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:41 am

No Way, As much as i hate to say it, Hes done.

rick301 · Post by **rick301** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:42 am

He does have more arm than Brunell ...

DESkins · Post by **DESkins** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:18 am

If there were to be a trade at all, it would have to be Collins for Favre, but I don't see a trade happening.

redskingush · Post by **redskingush** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:33 pm

Mursilis wrote:
1fan4ramsey wrote:I actually heard on a Sunday morning radio show (I believe Inside the NFL) that the Skins were considering trading for him in soon. Yikes

Yikes indeed. Don't we already have 2 veteran QBs whose best days are behind them?!?! Do we really need a third?!? And at what point do we play JC if we bring in Farve - that move makes no sense (unless of course they'll take Brunell in a straight-up trade. I'd do that deal in a minute. I'm not sure how much of an upgrade Farve is at this point over Brunell, but he's definitely an upgrade.).

He can still throw the frozen rope and he's still got the deep ball when he gets the time.

Primetime42 · Post by **Primetime42** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:37 pm

Oh I would LOVE it if you guys got Brett Favre

1fan4ramsey · Post by **1fan4ramsey** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:54 pm

1fan4ramsey wrote:I actually heard on a Sunday morning radio show (I believe Inside the NFL) that the Skins were considering trading for him in soon. Yikes

I think it was this sportswriter's idea of what might happen, you know how that goes.

HEROHAMO · Post by **HEROHAMO** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:25 am

Farve still has the physical abilities. He just needs to make better descisions.

HEROHAMO · Post by **HEROHAMO** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:27 am

Mursilis wrote:
1fan4ramsey wrote:I actually heard on a Sunday morning radio show (I believe Inside the NFL) that the Skins were considering trading for him in soon. Yikes

Yikes indeed. Don't we already have 2 veteran QBs whose best days are behind them?!?! Do we really need a third?!? And at what point do we play JC if we bring in Farve - that move makes no sense (unless of course they'll take Brunell in a straight-up trade. I'd do that deal in a minute. I'm not sure how much of an upgrade Farve is at this point over Brunell, but he's definitely an upgrade.).

Farve would play one to two years max. And hand the keys to JC that would be perfect.

tcwest10 · Post by **tcwest10** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:55 am

I'd rather let ARE do the interim throwing rather than to replace one headache with another.
In his day, there was none better than Brett. Sadly, his day was a Tuesday in 1997.

Jake · Post by **Jake** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:52 am

tcwest10 wrote:I'd rather let ARE do the interim throwing rather than to replace one headache with another.

Agreed.

HEROHAMO · Post by **HEROHAMO** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 12:48 pm

He is far better than what we currently have now. And at least he is not afraid to throw down field.

Donkey McDonkerton · Post by **Donkey McDonkerton** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:00 pm

HEROHAMO wrote:He is far better than what we currently have now. And at least he is not afraid to throw down field.

agreed. I dont want Brett, i just want to groom JC...BUT if JC is not gonna happen, Brett >>>> Mark.

Donkey McDonkerton · Post by **Donkey McDonkerton** » Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:01 pm

Primetime42 wrote:Oh I would LOVE it if you guys got Brett Favre

No you wouldnt. He CANT be worse than Brunell.

Primetime42 · Post by **Primetime42** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:26 am

Donkey McDonkerton wrote:
Primetime42 wrote:Oh I would LOVE it if you guys got Brett Favre

No you wouldnt. He CANT be worse than Brunell.

Brunell can't throw more than 10 yards down the field.

Favre can throw about 60 yards down the field and still hit a guy right in the numbers...a guy wearing the other jersey. (Substitute any number you'd like for 60)

Of course, I'd by happy. :twisted:

Donkey McDonkerton · Post by **Donkey McDonkerton** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:48 pm

Primetime42 wrote:
Donkey McDonkerton wrote:
Primetime42 wrote:Oh I would LOVE it if you guys got Brett Favre

No you wouldnt. He CANT be worse than Brunell.
Brunell can't throw more than 10 yards down the field.

Favre can throw about 60 yards down the field and still hit a guy right in the numbers...a guy wearing the other jersey. (Substitute any number you'd like for 60)

Of course, I'd by happy.

No you wouldnt, bc we would at least score some TD's with Brett.

REDEEMEDSKIN · Post by **REDEEMEDSKIN** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:55 pm

Donkey McDonkerton wrote:
Primetime42 wrote:
Donkey McDonkerton wrote:
Primetime42 wrote:Oh I would LOVE it if you guys got Brett Favre

No you wouldnt. He CANT be worse than Brunell.
Brunell can't throw more than 10 yards down the field.

Favre can throw about 60 yards down the field and still hit a guy right in the numbers...a guy wearing the other jersey. (Substitute any number you'd like for 60)

Of course, I'd by happy.

No you wouldnt, bc we would at least score some TD's with Brett.

Like he did against the Bears? :roll:

Donkey McDonkerton · Post by **Donkey McDonkerton** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:17 pm

REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Donkey McDonkerton wrote:
Primetime42 wrote:
Donkey McDonkerton wrote:
Primetime42 wrote:Oh I would LOVE it if you guys got Brett Favre

No you wouldnt. He CANT be worse than Brunell.
Brunell can't throw more than 10 yards down the field.

Favre can throw about 60 yards down the field and still hit a guy right in the numbers...a guy wearing the other jersey. (Substitute any number you'd like for 60)

Of course, I'd by happy.

No you wouldnt, bc we would at least score some TD's with Brett.

Like he did against the Bears?

he has some TDs doesnt he?

Irn-Bru · Post by **Irn-Bru** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:43 pm

he has some TDs doesnt he?

Clinton didn't have any TDs until week 6 of last season, but that stat doesn't reflect how important he was for us.

Mark may currently be struggling in every way, but bringing in Favre would be a step backward in entirely new and twisted dimensions.

Donkey McDonkerton · Post by **Donkey McDonkerton** » Sun Sep 24, 2006 11:21 am

Irn-Bru wrote:
he has some TDs doesnt he?

Clinton didn't have any TDs until week 6 of last season, but that stat doesn't reflect how important he was for us.

Mark may currently be struggling in every way, but bringing in Favre would be a step backward in entirely new and twisted dimensions.

And you are correct, thats why i said its JC time! I dont want Brett, but he would be better than Brunell. I dont brunell either.