Trung Canidate
-
- *********
- Posts: 1185
- youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:23 pm
- Location: Fayetteville, NC
Trung Canidate
http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/187503 I know alot of people keep throwing Trung's name up when it comes to cutting players, but I really don't want him to be cut. I think he should stay with the skins. He should at least be a back up for Portis. Trung is extremely fast. Some say he can't break tackles that good, but his yards per carry average says otherwise. Alot of people justify Ramsey's performance by blaming Spurrier. Trung did pretty good considering he ran in Spurrier's system. He could do even better under Bugle. I don't understand why people say he should be cut. I think he's pretty good. His salary isn't that high and keeping him allows us to have depth at RB. Trung and Portis are the exact size and weight with great speed. He is the perfect back up for Portis.
Let us all gather around and drink the
ey-Aid of the Redskins.

It's true, what you say about Canidate. Remember though, he's been buried before behind an All-Pro RB, in St. Louis. He chafed in that role. I think the kindest thing we could do for him is let him go. Let him see if there's another team out there (??) who could put him to better use. I'd rather have a change of pace guy running with Portis, somebody like Betts.
"Sit back and watch the Redskins.
SOMETHING MAGICAL IS ABOUT TO BEGIN!"
JPFair- A fan's fan. RIP, brother
SOMETHING MAGICAL IS ABOUT TO BEGIN!"
JPFair- A fan's fan. RIP, brother
-
- swine
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 12:30 pm
- Location: CORPUS CHRISTI ,TEXAS
-
- ~~~
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 3:57 pm
- Location: Ohio
I will agree with you somewhat. I thought with all of the line and coacing changes that there was no real need to blow a lot of cash and sign Portis, thus losing Bailey. I thought that we may have actually had a pretty good year running the ball with our existing backs. Apparently though, I was overruled. Now that we have Portis, I would have to cut Trung just for financial reasons alone. I don't know his cap number, but I think it's around a mil or so. Let's just sit back and watch Joe do his thing.
Remember, I didn't approve of trading ChAmp, so I just have to have faith and sit back like everyone else.

Remember, I didn't approve of trading ChAmp, so I just have to have faith and sit back like everyone else.

You'll always be remembered Sean. R.I.P.
-
- ~~~
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 3:57 pm
- Location: Ohio
-
- Hog
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 6:56 pm
- Location: DC
I totally disagree with you Brandon There is no need to keep Trung Candidate! First of all he sucks. Second of all Ladell Betts had shown signs last year but just was unable to stay healthy. He is the bruiser type of back Gibbs loves. I feel he is much better then Trung. The only purpose for keeping a back like Trung would be for a 3rd down changeup back and we have Chad Morton for that.
"SUCK FOR LUCK"
-
- *********
- Posts: 1185
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:23 pm
- Location: Fayetteville, NC
How can you say he sucks? His career yards per carry average is 4.6. That's damn good. His salary, if I'm not mistaken isn't even 1 mill. He is extremely fast and can catch the ball. I think he is perfect for backing up Portis. Sure, we can use Betts, but what if Portis sprains an ankle or something. It will be nice to have a speedy back available for insurance purposes. Betts will be used when we need a big back.RedskinsRule56 wrote:I totally disagree with you Brandon There is no need to keep Trung Candidate! First of all he sucks. Second of all Ladell Betts had shown signs last year but just was unable to stay healthy. He is the bruiser type of back Gibbs loves. I feel he is much better then Trung. The only purpose for keeping a back like Trung would be for a 3rd down changeup back and we have Chad Morton for that.
Last edited by Brandon777 on Mon Mar 08, 2004 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Let us all gather around and drink the
ey-Aid of the Redskins.

-
- *********
- Posts: 1185
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:23 pm
- Location: Fayetteville, NC
I agree.oafusp wrote:Portis = Earnest Byner
Betts = Gerald Riggs/change of pace
Trung = Portis' backup since Betts is not a "slasher n` dasher" like Trung/Portis are.
If the Skins keep Portis, Betts, and Trung they would have one of the deepest RB corps in the league....and Gibbs is all about depth.
Let us all gather around and drink the
ey-Aid of the Redskins.

-
- newbie
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 10:16 pm
- Contact:
I hate to say this and I hope I don't jinx Portis and the Skins, but Portis has missed a couple of games the last couple of years(similar to faulk, they both miss about 2 or 3 games a year) Trung did great backing up Faulk, when he was injured and his contract really isn't that bad(if it's under a milliion) I say keep him and if Portis does get injured, then he'd fill in fine. Of course if we can get maybe a draft pick in exchange for him, then go for it.
I like the comment about Trung maybe doing better behind Joe Bugel line, I really hadn't thought about it like that.
If he was going to be cut I think it would have been done by now. He's either on the trading block or they're going to see what he can do in preseason.
If he was going to be cut I think it would have been done by now. He's either on the trading block or they're going to see what he can do in preseason.
Touchdown, Washington Redskins...
- hailskins666
- aka Evil Hog
- Posts: 6481
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 9:01 am
- Location: South of Heaven, trying to hit a toilet on shrooms
- Contact:
-
- Hog
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 11:09 am
- CrazyLikeAFox87
- swine
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 8:50 pm
- Location: Colchester, England