Redskins get look at new offense

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
User avatar
rick301
Hog
Posts: 655
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 11:10 am
Location: Columbia, MD

Redskins get look at new offense

Post by rick301 »

The expensive acquisitions of talented receivers Antwaan Randle El and Brandon Lloyd will surely help separate the Redskins, but Saunders might wind up being Washington's best offseason addition.


Good article at:

http://www.washtimes.com/sports/2006051 ... -4920r.htm
Justice Hog
Pursuer of Justice
Pursuer of Justice
Posts: 5809
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 8:38 pm
Location: Newark, Delaware

Post by Justice Hog »

I am really hoping that our players are able to pick up Saunders' offense quickly and are able to execute it flawlessly by the beginning of the season. Any time you bring in a new offensive system, there's usually a "break in" period. I'm hoping ours isn't too long.
Fran Farren
"Justice Hog"

Newark, DE

“God didn't give us a spirit that is timid but one that is powerful, loving and controlled.” 2 Timothy 1:7
Mursilis
mursilis
mursilis
Posts: 2415
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 8:07 pm

Post by Mursilis »

"When you work against a defense for the first time, you're a little dubious about what the results will be, but I couldn't be more pleased about the practice we had today," said Saunders, who called 42 pass plays and will add 20 to 50 more during each of the next 11 days before focusing the final two OTA sessions on short-yardage and goal-line situations.

:shock:
So they'll have 60-90 passing plays to memorize, and that's before they even add the running plays?!? Amazing.
User avatar
rick301
Hog
Posts: 655
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 11:10 am
Location: Columbia, MD

Post by rick301 »

Mursilis wrote:
"When you work against a defense for the first time, you're a little dubious about what the results will be, but I couldn't be more pleased about the practice we had today," said Saunders, who called 42 pass plays and will add 20 to 50 more during each of the next 11 days before focusing the final two OTA sessions on short-yardage and goal-line situations.

:shock:
So they'll have 60-90 passing plays to memorize, and that's before they even add the running plays?!? Amazing.


I suspect that they will have base plays - but each play will have variations - hence the large number of plays. For example, if they have 3 plays, with 3 different hot reads with 3 different depths (short, medium, long) then you'd have 27 different possibilities.
User avatar
notwhy26
piglet
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:32 pm
Location: Maryland

Post by notwhy26 »

I'm excited," said Chris Cooley, who has moved from H-back to tight end.


guess Cooleys a TE, so we'll see how he fits in that role, and not the H-Back role
Redskin in Canada
~~~~~~
~~~~~~
Posts: 10323
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 9:59 am
Location: Canada

Post by Redskin in Canada »

That playbook is worth its considerable weight in gold. This is going to be really interesting. I am as excited as I have ever been since Joe came back.

By the way:

The Redskins' rookie pool for their six draft picks and their 15 rookie free agents is $2.24 million, leaving about $1.5 million to spend in the post-June 1 free agent market and for an injured reserve fund.


I say we have a reserve of over a million to find somebody that might become available between now and the final roster announcement. What position? I do not really know.
Daniel Snyder has defined incompetence, failure and greed to true Washington Redskins fans for over a decade and a half. Stay away from football operations !!!
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

I expected Cooley to move to TE since Saunders doesn't use an HB.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
SkinsHead56
Hog
Posts: 805
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:03 pm
Location: Santa Barbara,CA

Post by SkinsHead56 »

notwhy26 wrote:
I'm excited," said Chris Cooley, who has moved from H-back to tight end.


guess Cooleys a TE, so we'll see how he fits in that role, and not the H-Back role


He'll be better that he was last year. Fauria or Sellers at the opposite TE in the twin TE set. or Cooley & Sellers in the traditional 2 back set. Shift, motion.... touch down! This O will be able to run or pass in a variaty of packages & formations. As long as the line does it's job we should see some great stuff out of our O, in turn making our D even better!
In memorium Sean Taylor 1983-2007 R.I.P.

Long live the Legend of "Meast".
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

yupchagee wrote:I expected Cooley to move to TE since Saunders doesn't use an HB.


Image

I kid, I kid.. :lol:
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

I was responding to notwhy26. Also many "experts" said we would pick a TE in the 2nd round.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
hkHog
Hog
Posts: 1912
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:06 pm

Post by hkHog »

Mursilis wrote:
"When you work against a defense for the first time, you're a little dubious about what the results will be, but I couldn't be more pleased about the practice we had today," said Saunders, who called 42 pass plays and will add 20 to 50 more during each of the next 11 days before focusing the final two OTA sessions on short-yardage and goal-line situations.

:shock:
So they'll have 60-90 passing plays to memorize, and that's before they even add the running plays?!? Amazing.


Wait a minute, re-read that quote:

will add 20 to 50 more during each of the next 11 days


So that seems to say we'll be adding 35 passing plays every day for eleven days. We're talking about a minimum of 400 passing plays if that is true!!!
"We're not going to be the pushovers of the NFL, we're gonna push over some people!" - Clinton Portis
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

That can't be true. There can't be that many plays in the playbook, nobody could keep them straight. He may be refering to total outcomes, on each pass play, there are several options, possibly 3-4 different receivers in the pattern. Sometimes receivers may have options on their routes, the QB may be forced to roll out, etc.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
VRIEL1
Hog
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 12:56 pm

Post by VRIEL1 »

I would bet it is true....Saunders has stated in interviews that he likes to have 200 to 300 plays for a sunday game. He stated that he never uses the same plays two games in a row. That would mean close to 400 to 600 plays in a play book. If they only use 20 to 40 plays the whole game because they are working then you can imagine how he might not use the same plays all year long. always mixing it up.
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

They can't run 200-300 plays in a game. They will have maybe 50-60 offensive snaps. Based on not using the same play twice in 2 weeks, that would mean 120 plays in the playbook min. If he has 300 plays ready for a givgame & runs 60, he would "only" need 360 in his playbook.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
Fios
The Evil Straw
The Evil Straw
Posts: 8135
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 2:30 pm
Location: Leather Chair
Contact:

Post by Fios »

Also, were I an OC (and we should be thankful I am not) and were I talking to the press about my offense, I would ... aim high ... when discussing the total number of potential plays.
RIP Sean Taylor
User avatar
hkHog
Hog
Posts: 1912
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:06 pm

Post by hkHog »

yupchagee wrote:They can't run 200-300 plays in a game. They will have maybe 50-60 offensive snaps. Based on not using the same play twice in 2 weeks, that would mean 120 plays in the playbook min. If he has 300 plays ready for a givgame & runs 60, he would "only" need 360 in his playbook.


There have been many reports that Saunders never runs the same play twice over a four week span. That means he must have 300 at a bare minimum.
"We're not going to be the pushovers of the NFL, we're gonna push over some people!" - Clinton Portis
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

My guess is that he exagerates for the "benefit" of rival coaches.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

hkHog wrote:
yupchagee wrote:They can't run 200-300 plays in a game. They will have maybe 50-60 offensive snaps. Based on not using the same play twice in 2 weeks, that would mean 120 plays in the playbook min. If he has 300 plays ready for a givgame & runs 60, he would "only" need 360 in his playbook.


There have been many reports that Saunders never runs the same play twice over a four week span. That means he must have 300 at a bare minimum.

Does that mean if CP breaks one for 80 yards Al won't run the play again for a month :roll: No one they call him a guru
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
User avatar
rick301
Hog
Posts: 655
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 11:10 am
Location: Columbia, MD

Post by rick301 »

1niksder wrote:
hkHog wrote:
yupchagee wrote:They can't run 200-300 plays in a game. They will have maybe 50-60 offensive snaps. Based on not using the same play twice in 2 weeks, that would mean 120 plays in the playbook min. If he has 300 plays ready for a givgame & runs 60, he would "only" need 360 in his playbook.


There have been many reports that Saunders never runs the same play twice over a four week span. That means he must have 300 at a bare minimum.

Does that mean if CP breaks one for 80 yards Al won't run the play again for a month :roll: No one they call him a guru


Oh he'll run it again - but from a different formation for a different look to the defense.
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

Maybe if you multiply the # of formations by the # of plays by the # of options in a given play you get the numbers we're talking about.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

The plan is to have the defense force a turnover every time they hit the field (this will give the O more opportunities). The Special Teams will not be returning kicks (we'll be stepping out at the one to give the offense more field to work with). All positions players have agreed to "fall down" after gains of more than 17 yards.

Critics are saying Saunders won't have enough plays to get halfway through the season before his offense becomes outdated and predictable. :cry: ESPN is already point to the move to bring in Al Saunders has the final pin in the coffin of the Gibbs II
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

I'm glad you cleared that up for us.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

yupchagee wrote:I'm glad you cleared that up for us.

Glad I could help :lol:
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Post Reply