






The Hogster wrote:Portis crushing a LB...Brunell on the move to make a completion. Who says the old man can't elude?
Chris Luva Luva wrote:The Hogster wrote:Brunell will have the last laugh......AGAIN.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
BRUNELL FOR PRESIDENT!!!
Look how he laughs in the face of adversity. What you can't see in that picture is redeemed who is right underneath of the cameras view.
I aint crying and complaining I love the Skins and was happy with last season. I just dont think Brunell is the answer. You cant tell me that he is the best Qb on our squad. I only want whats best for the skins and Brunell is not that. He is a fumble waiting to happen he also has a weak arm. Make no mistake about it I am happy with what the skins are doing. Duhhh...Gibbs is a genious that dosent mean I have to agree with every move he makes. I just cant stand a mediocre Qb. I strive for excellence not mediocrity.The Hogster wrote:I hate pessimists. Especially those who cry and moan without any facts or information to support their nervous breakdown.
We were 2 games from the Superbowl. Added Al Saunders and Jerry Gray to our staff. Got a Pass Rushing DE. Signed not one but TWO good receivers. Added a proven TE. Added a hard hitting Safety.
We have a 6 foot 4 230 lb, mobile and accurate QB waiting in the wings, and the draft coming up.
ALL YOU HAVE TO TALK ABOUT IS NEGATIVE CRAP???
Boooo to all of you....Brunell played well with one reciever last year. This year we have more weapons and an effecive scheme and all you people do is moan and whine about Brunell.
He shut your traps last year and he will do it again this year. If not, Campbell will prove why Gibbs was a genius for drafting him. What the heck is there to be crying and complaining about?
Gibbs is not going to play Campbell just because some anxious non-athlete wants to see Campbell give it a whirl. Get your popcorn ready for the pre-season, you will see him play then. If Brunell gets hurt, you'll see him play then. If not, next year.
Quit acting frantic...about 25 teams in the NFL would love to have our situation at QB.
HEROHAMO wrote:I aint crying and complaining I love the Skins and was happy with last season. I just dont think Brunell is the answer. You cant tell me that he is the best Qb on our squad. I only want whats best for the skins and Brunell is not that. He is a fumble waiting to happen he also has a weak arm. Make no mistake about it I am happy with what the skins are doing. Duhhh...Gibbs is a genious that dosent mean I have to agree with every move he makes. I just cant stand a mediocre Qb. I strive for excellence not mediocrity.The Hogster wrote:I hate pessimists. Especially those who cry and moan without any facts or information to support their nervous breakdown.
We were 2 games from the Superbowl. Added Al Saunders and Jerry Gray to our staff. Got a Pass Rushing DE. Signed not one but TWO good receivers. Added a proven TE. Added a hard hitting Safety.
We have a 6 foot 4 230 lb, mobile and accurate QB waiting in the wings, and the draft coming up.
ALL YOU HAVE TO TALK ABOUT IS NEGATIVE CRAP???
Boooo to all of you....Brunell played well with one reciever last year. This year we have more weapons and an effecive scheme and all you people do is moan and whine about Brunell.
He shut your traps last year and he will do it again this year. If not, Campbell will prove why Gibbs was a genius for drafting him. What the heck is there to be crying and complaining about?
Gibbs is not going to play Campbell just because some anxious non-athlete wants to see Campbell give it a whirl. Get your popcorn ready for the pre-season, you will see him play then. If Brunell gets hurt, you'll see him play then. If not, next year.
Quit acting frantic...about 25 teams in the NFL would love to have our situation at QB.
The Hogster wrote: Mark Brunnel should have made the Pro Bowl last year. He had a better year than Jake Delhomme.
Mursilis wrote:The Hogster wrote: Mark Brunnel should have made the Pro Bowl last year. He had a better year than Jake Delhomme.
Let's see, Delhomme had more yards, more yards per attempt, a higher completion percentage, more TD's, a higher passer rating, and a better overall record as a starter. He also took his team deeper in the playoffs. But Brunell had a better year?
The Hogster wrote:I mispoke, I meant that he had a better year than Micheal Vick.
Delhomme and Hasselbeck had statistically better years, but Brunell should have went to the Pro-Bowl in the third slot.
Either way...his numbers were only marginally lower than Delhomme's and he outclassed Delhomme against the Seattle Seahawks defense in the playoffs.
The Hogster wrote:I mispoke, I meant that he had a better year than Micheal Vick.
John Manfreda wrote:The Hogster wrote:I mispoke, I meant that he had a better year than Micheal Vick.
Delhomme and Hasselbeck had statistically better years, but Brunell should have went to the Pro-Bowl in the third slot.
Either way...his numbers were only marginally lower than Delhomme's and he outclassed Delhomme against the Seattle Seahawks defense in the playoffs.
Brunell shouldn't have gone to the pro-bowl. Good year maybe but not with all those fumbles, which they don't inlcude passing efficancy rating. They don't include scrambling yds. which Vick probably killed him on also. Thats bias homer talk.
"What the heck do I want John Elway". Actually yes I want that type of caliber. I see that potential in Campbell. Rothlesburger made some amazing plays for his team the whole season. That tackle in Indy that saved the game. He also was outstanding in the game versus Cincy and Indy. Brunell is well past his prime so you cannot compare a young Rothlesberger to an old aging Brunell. We made the playoffs last year and Brunell had plenty of oppurtunity to show his stuff and just like the past he fell short. How many times has he been to the playoffs and just choked numerous times with the Jaguars and with the Jags he had stellar recievers. I believe Jason Campbell should get the oppurtunity to at least compete for the starting spot. Irrational I am only being realistic.The Hogster wrote:HEROHAMO wrote:I aint crying and complaining I love the Skins and was happy with last season. I just dont think Brunell is the answer. You cant tell me that he is the best Qb on our squad. I only want whats best for the skins and Brunell is not that. He is a fumble waiting to happen he also has a weak arm. Make no mistake about it I am happy with what the skins are doing. Duhhh...Gibbs is a genious that dosent mean I have to agree with every move he makes. I just cant stand a mediocre Qb. I strive for excellence not mediocrity.The Hogster wrote:I hate pessimists. Especially those who cry and moan without any facts or information to support their nervous breakdown.
We were 2 games from the Superbowl. Added Al Saunders and Jerry Gray to our staff. Got a Pass Rushing DE. Signed not one but TWO good receivers. Added a proven TE. Added a hard hitting Safety.
We have a 6 foot 4 230 lb, mobile and accurate QB waiting in the wings, and the draft coming up.
ALL YOU HAVE TO TALK ABOUT IS NEGATIVE CRAP???
Boooo to all of you....Brunell played well with one reciever last year. This year we have more weapons and an effecive scheme and all you people do is moan and whine about Brunell.
He shut your traps last year and he will do it again this year. If not, Campbell will prove why Gibbs was a genius for drafting him. What the heck is there to be crying and complaining about?
Gibbs is not going to play Campbell just because some anxious non-athlete wants to see Campbell give it a whirl. Get your popcorn ready for the pre-season, you will see him play then. If Brunell gets hurt, you'll see him play then. If not, next year.
Quit acting frantic...about 25 teams in the NFL would love to have our situation at QB.
You just made a bold faced, unsubstantiated statement. You just said that " I can't tell you Brunell is the best QB on our team". Okay, "Can you tell me that he isn't"? NO
Listen dude, you are not striving for excellence, you are being irrational. Brunell played well enough to win a Superbowl last year, we need a TEAM around him that is capable of carrying the load when he struggles. We didn't have that last year. Rothlesberger looked terrible for most of the Superbowl but his team was good enough to carry the team anyway.
Last year we were close, this year we have a more rounded team that can beat you in more ways than we could last year. Just listen to Santana Moss who said in an interview today that Mark did a great job. Mark Brunnel should have made the Pro Bowl last year. He had a better year than Jake Delhomme. What the heck do you want...John Elway???
Be realistic...Jason Campbell will play WHEN HE GIVES US THE BEST CHANCE TO WIN.
Gibbs knows better than you when that will be.
The Hogster wrote:Either way...his numbers were only marginally lower than Delhomme's and he outclassed Delhomme against the Seattle Seahawks defense in the playoffs.
die cowboys die wrote:The Hogster wrote:Either way...his numbers were only marginally lower than Delhomme's and he outclassed Delhomme against the Seattle Seahawks defense in the playoffs.
that is not correct. brunell was Absolutely Terrible against the seahawks in the playoffs. he hit a few big plays toward the end that padded his stats, but the game was already out of hand. the stats don't tell the story. i have the game on tape and brunell was cover-your-eyes awful.
The Hogster wrote:John Manfreda wrote:The Hogster wrote:I mispoke, I meant that he had a better year than Micheal Vick.
Delhomme and Hasselbeck had statistically better years, but Brunell should have went to the Pro-Bowl in the third slot.
Either way...his numbers were only marginally lower than Delhomme's and he outclassed Delhomme against the Seattle Seahawks defense in the playoffs.
Brunell shouldn't have gone to the pro-bowl. Good year maybe but not with all those fumbles, which they don't inlcude passing efficancy rating. They don't include scrambling yds. which Vick probably killed him on also. Thats bias homer talk.
Uh, it's not biased homer talk. I went to high school with Michael Vick, he's from my 'hometown', and I love his game. But last year, Brunell deserved to go.
Had Culpepper and McNabb been healthy there's no way this is even a discussion, but many people thought that Brunell deserved it when you look at what he did for his team.
Brunell, Hasselbeck, and Delhome lead their teams to at least the second round of the playoffs. The Falcons missed the playoffs entirely.
In the grand scheme of things, there is a strong argument that he could have been selected. You my friend just seem to post random BS without knowing anything about where I am coming from.
The Hogster wrote:Only one team can win the Superbowl. Brunell hasn't choked. He played for the expansion Jaguars and took them to the AFC Championship game.
Steve Spurrier III wrote:The Hogster wrote:Only one team can win the Superbowl. Brunell hasn't choked. He played for the expansion Jaguars and took them to the AFC Championship game.
Somehow, I think if Mark Brunell was still just 26 like he was in 1996 nobody would be complaining.
I don't have a real problem with Brunell starting, although I think the Redskins would be foolish to not try to get Campbell as many reps as possible during the season.
I just hope that Gibbs will be willing to pull the trigger if Brunell gets beat up and starts playing poorly.
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Brunell gets hurt badly? Jason should play until Brunell is back to 100%.
I guess we'll find out in preseason, but judging by the way Gibbs has handled Brunell thus far, Brunell will probably have to play pretty bad for an extended period of time before he gets yanked.