How will the NFC East finish up this year

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:56 pm

gottoloveit wrote:Randle El - over paid and over rated
Archuletta - best years are behind him and over paid as well

Alright, smart guy, if they were over-paid, please tell me their salaries.

redskinz4ever · Post by **redskinz4ever** » Sat Mar 25, 2006 2:27 pm

JansenFan wrote:They made the second round of the playoffs, and signed players that address their weaknesses. Just the Steelers won the Super Bowl and it makes you feel superior to everyone, doesn't mean a playoff team that improved in it's weakest areas won't be that good. Your the one that needs to get over yourself.

Maybe you should worry about the lack of improvement by your team.

Tacoma Redskin · Post by **Tacoma Redskin** » Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:45 pm

gottoloveit wrote:here is my line up

1. Cowboys
2. Giants
3. Redskins
4. Eagles

This bonehead was on here a little over a week ago claiming to be a Steeler fan. I saw him for a Cowpuke in disguise and called him on it. I think this thread proves it.

Punu · Post by **Punu** » Sat Mar 25, 2006 9:42 pm

TROLL

sch1977 · Post by **sch1977** » Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:23 am

gottoloveit wrote:skins will come in 3rd your not a very good team - get over yourselves

And your Steelers are?????

gottoloveit · Post by **gottoloveit** » Sun Mar 26, 2006 2:42 pm

Skins will always be a subpar team because your owner and his side kick Cerrato havent got a clue about what it takes to build (not buy) a football team. You're a joke and a laughing stock around the league.

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Sun Mar 26, 2006 2:43 pm

gottoloveit wrote:Skins will always be a subpar team because your owner and his side kick Cerrato havent got a clue about what it takes to build (not buy) a football team. You're a joke and a laughing stock around the league.

Thanks for your input. Have a nice day.

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Sun Mar 26, 2006 7:59 pm

I think your answer and sig line sums it up nicely c'ville! Sounds like someone does not like what his team has done (or not done!) this past month?

crazyhorse1 · Post by **crazyhorse1** » Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:41 pm

gottoloveit wrote:here is my line up

1. Cowboys
2. Giants
3. Redskins
4. Eagles

Moron TROLL

crazyhorse1 · Post by **crazyhorse1** » Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:49 pm

If Campbell works out:

Redskins
Giants
Cowboys
Eagles

If Campbell and Brunell both flop:

Redskins
Giants
Cowboys
Eagle

If all the seas gang dry, my love:

Redskins
Giants
Cowboys
Eagles

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:51 am

CH wrote:

gottoloveit wrote:
here is my line up

1. Cowboys
2. Giants
3. Redskins
4. Eagles

Moron TROLL

Oh, the irony! Now, THAT is just delicious! :lol:

JansenFan · Post by **JansenFan** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:25 pm

gottoloveit wrote:Skins will always be a subpar team because your owner and his side kick Cerrato havent got a clue about what it takes to build (not buy) a football team. You're a joke and a laughing stock around the league.

Somebody smack the record player. It's skipping again.

HEROHAMO · Post by **HEROHAMO** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:06 pm

gottoloveit wrote:Skins will always be a subpar team because your owner and his side kick Cerrato havent got a clue about what it takes to build (not buy) a football team. You're a joke and a laughing stock around the league.

Everytime you speak all I can hear is a fart sound! burrrrrrrrrghhhhhhhh!!!! :lol:

sch1977 · Post by **sch1977** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:06 pm

gottoloveit wrote:Skins will always be a subpar team because your owner and his side kick Cerrato havent got a clue about what it takes to build (not buy) a football team. You're a joke and a laughing stock around the league.

You're a laughing stock at your own family reunions

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 11:16 pm

gottoloveit wrote:Skins will always be a subpar team because your owner and his side kick Cerrato havent got a clue about what it takes to build (not buy) a football team. You're a joke and a laughing stock around the league.

Your post would past as a joke it we didn't know it was coming from a TROLL. As far as "the Danny" and Vinny trying to buy a team. "the Danny" paid $800M for this team back in the 90's. Where you been. BTW: Gibbs is calling the shots.

I hate it when Trolls a totally off base, you'd think they could get at least 1 part of their mindless drivel correct.

ROTFALMAO

You're the laughing stock around the internet

Snout · Post by **Snout** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:21 am

In alphabetical order:

Dallas 10-6
New York 9-7
Philadelphia 7-9
Washington 16-0

You saw it here first. It will be a year for the history books.

Mursilis · Post by **Mursilis** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:18 am

Snout wrote:In alphabetical order:

Washington 16-0

You saw it here first. It will be a year for the history books.

Shouldn't you be saying 19-0? A perfect season is useless without a sweep of the playoffs!

Really, as much as I'd like us to finish 16-0, it's not going to happen. The Brunellmobile just has too many miles; it's going to break-down at some point next season. Hopefully, J. Campbell can step up and fill the void.

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:16 am

I think we are better this year and should have a better record. This is going to be a very competitive division and all 4 teams will be better than last year. I really think the Eagles will be right back in it and the pukes will score a lot of points. The gints are a bit of a question mark!
The NFL is not as easy to predict as there are just a lot of teams that are winning games against better teams for a lot of different reasons.

On paper we are one of the 5 best in the NFC and should win the NFC East but in todays NFL it would be next to impossible to go 16-0.

11-5 or 12-4 would be okay for this team :roll:

AZHog · Post by **AZHog** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:24 am

11-5 or bust!

martinema · Post by **martinema** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 6:57 pm

Heres how I think it will go
1. Dallas 11-5: I think Dallas getting TO and rebuilding the offence will have the best chance of winning the division.
2. New York 10-6: New York bring back Manning will be grate plus having Barber is going to give them a grate step.
3. Redskins

8-8: Lets face the facts if Mark Burnell starts after how he played in the playoffs we will be lucky to get to 8-8 we need a good quarterback that could sit in the pocket and find a recover.
4. Eagles 6-10: The eagles have no running game no recovers and not that good of a defense.

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:15 pm

martinema wrote:Heres how I think it will go
1. Dallas 11-5: I think Dallas getting TO and rebuilding the offence will have the best chance of winning the division.
2. New York 10-6: New York bring back Manning will be grate plus having Barber is going to give them a grate step.
3. Redskins 8-8: Lets face the facts if Mark Burnell starts after how he played in the playoffs we will be lucky to get to 8-8 we need a good quarterback that could sit in the pocket and find a recover.
4. Eagles 6-10: The eagles have no running game no recovers and not that good of a defense.

We don't have any recovers either! When you learn the difference between a "great QB" and a "grate QB" I will maybe begin to give you a modicum of credibility, but for now you have a little way to go! :wink:

BTW - welcome to the best site for all that's grate about our Redskins

skinsRin · Post by **skinsRin** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:28 pm

SkinsJock wrote:
martinema wrote:Heres how I think it will go
1. Dallas 11-5: I think Dallas getting TO and rebuilding the offence will have the best chance of winning the division.
2. New York 10-6: New York bring back Manning will be grate plus having Barber is going to give them a grate step.
3. Redskins 8-8: Lets face the facts if Mark Burnell starts after how he played in the playoffs we will be lucky to get to 8-8 we need a good quarterback that could sit in the pocket and find a recover.
4. Eagles 6-10: The eagles have no running game no recovers and not that good of a defense.

We don't have any recovers either! When you learn the difference between a "great QB" and a "grate QB" I will maybe begin to give you a modicum of credibility, but for now you have a little way to go!

BTW - welcome to the best site for all that's grate about our Redskins

Martin, we have grate recovers! So you feel we are going to go from 10-6 to 8-8 by adding the weapons we did in the offseason. Are you a skins fan or just another jealous troll?

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:19 pm

Are you a skins fan or just another jealous troll?

A "gotoloveit" by any other name is still a troll.

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:20 pm

Are you a skins fan or just another jealous troll?

A "gottoloveit" by any other name is still a troll.

Dang it... stupid mouse!

HEROHAMO · Post by **HEROHAMO** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:34 pm

martinema wrote:Heres how I think it will go
1. Dallas 11-5: I think Dallas getting TO and rebuilding the offence will have the best chance of winning the division.
2. New York 10-6: New York bring back Manning will be grate plus having Barber is going to give them a grate step.
3. Redskins 8-8: Lets face the facts if Mark Burnell starts after how he played in the playoffs we will be lucky to get to 8-8 we need a good quarterback that could sit in the pocket and find a recover.
4. Eagles 6-10: The eagles have no running game no recovers and not that good of a defense.

All I hear is fart sounds Purrrrrghhhhhhhh........

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

How will the NFC East finish up this year

Re: How will the NFC East finish up this year

Re: How will the NFC East finish up this year

i