Sorry, don't agree. Campbell has a lot more talent than Ramsey. He's a more accurate passer, he can run, and once he learns the Offense he will be a stud.
I don't care if he's the second coming of Joe Montana. Campbell would not have been the best choice to put in the Giants game (when Ramsey went in and did enough for us to come out with a "W").
Lets think this scenario through for a second shall we??
A rookie...
Who has not played since the pre-season (a preseason need we be reminded that he didn't play that much since Brunell and Ramsey actually got most of the reps in the preseason games)...
Going in to fill in for the starting QB (who incidentally got most of the resp in practice that week) after the starter was injured and out of the game...
Going in against a decent defense that can confuse coverages...
Against the division leaders...
With our playoffs hopes still on the line...
No way I'd call for a rookie over Ramsey in that situation. Not a chance in hell.
Ramsey for all his faults (of which he does have some/many);
1.) knew the offense
2.) has started in the NFL before and is used to the speed
3.) actually got more playing time that year than the rookie (yes even in preseason he got more playing time)
Again - I'm not talking about who will be a better QB or who is a better QB. I'm talking about right at that moment, which QB gave us the better chance to win the ballgame. Thats what a backup does. Gives you a chance to come out with a win when your starter goes down.
And THAT is why Gibbs and Co. kept Ramsey this past year instead of trading him for a higher pick. Peace of mind is worth something too.