Our 2006 Opponents...lets discuss

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Our 2006 Opponents...lets discuss

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

HomePukes
Iggles
Girls
Falcons
Pussy Cats
Vikes
Jags
Little Titans

AwayPukes
Iggles
Girls
Saints
TB Sucs
Rams
Texans
Colts

Since our team is really taking shape for 2006, lets get everyones opinions on our impending match ups.

Colts - 50/50 - Their defense is suspect especially if you can stop Freeny/pass rush. Their secondary is overrated. With James gone and a DE we definately stand a good chance against their offense.

Texans - W - No explanation needed. ;)

Rams - W - Artichoke will show up on this game. Their RB is decent enough but cannt not run against us. The greatest show on turf is now a side act.

Sucs - 60/40 - The rilvary (?) will peak. Gruden will run off at the mouth and be laughed at again. Chris Simms will try to do too much in trying to make up for the playoff loss.

Saints - W - C'mon now...

Pukes - SWEEP - They suck and will continue to do so.

Giants - SWEEP - They'll need 2 more DB's. They got Madison for Moss but they weren't counting on 2 more WR's they can't cover.

Iggles - Sweep - They missed their boat and the flood water is rising. Westbrook is not a RB, he's a heavy WR. They dont have any WR's worth a darn now and we all know their defense isnt all that.

Titans - W- Mis Pacman will get abused.

Jags - 50/50 - Definately a good, underrated team.

Vikes - W - Brad Johnson? :lol: Fred Smoot? Im going to mark this one down. Fred Smoot will get exposed like never before.

Cats - 50/50 - Definately a good team and will make us work hard.

Falcons - W -Mike Vick is not a QB who can beat this defense, if we contain him he's going to throw picks. If we let him loose of course he'll have a chance. If he comes near Taylor we wont have to worry about him anymore.

The bandwagon is warming up, I tried to be partial but as the driver I can be blatantly homerish. Any given Sunday, yadda yadda yadda I know... This is just something to discuss and to keep you guys busy during a LONG offseason.
Last edited by Chris Luva Luva on Wed Mar 15, 2006 1:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
Justice Hog
Pursuer of Justice
Pursuer of Justice
Posts: 5809
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 8:38 pm
Location: Newark, Delaware

Post by Justice Hog »

Home

Run the table

Away
Pukes - L (we can't sweep them 2 in a row, can we?)
Iggles - L (I just doubt we'll sweep them)
Girls - W (doubt they'll be any good. Tiki can't repeat)
Saints - W
TB Sucs - W
Rams - W
Texans - W
Colts - L (probably another good year for them)

Overall: 13-3

Overly optimistic? Perhaps. Homer picks? Quite likely.
Within the realm of possibility? Absolutely.
Fran Farren
"Justice Hog"

Newark, DE

“God didn't give us a spirit that is timid but one that is powerful, loving and controlled.” 2 Timothy 1:7
gibbsfan
Joe's#1Fan
Joe's#1Fan
Posts: 1948
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 11:59 am
Location: chocowinity nc

Post by gibbsfan »

lookin at this schedule i,m seeing 12-4 and winning the nfc east.hopin for a first round bye in the playoffs.

it should be interesting.
This Ownership Has The Quarantine Virus..
gay4pacman
Pacman Rules
Pacman Rules
Posts: 1842
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:56 pm
Location: Lawn Monster

Post by gay4pacman »

before we picked up el,lloyd,...all freee agents, i said 12-4.


HomePukes W
Iggles W
Girls W
Falcons L
Pussy Cats W
Vikes W
Jags W
Little Titans W

AwayPukes L
Iggles W
Girls L
Saints W
TB Sucs W
Rams W
Texans W
Colts L
I know this guy named Jimmy, he has a pet....POSTERNUTBAG! Thats his cats name, POSTERNUTBAG!!!
User avatar
spenser
Hog
Posts: 1035
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 1:03 am

Post by spenser »

HomePukes W
Iggles W
Giants L
Falcons W
Cats L
Vikes W
Jags W
Little Titans W

AwayPukes L
Iggles L
Giants w
Saints W
Bucs W
Rams W
Texans W
Colts L
User avatar
cvillehog
Hog
Posts: 5220
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 3:03 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by cvillehog »

Off-topic, but I sort of expected this to be more of a free agency rundown for our pending opponents, which is a discussion I'd like to see...
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

cvillehog wrote:Off-topic, but I sort of expected this to be more of a free agency rundown for our pending opponents, which is a discussion I'd like to see...


Start up a topic in the ATL forum.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
redskinz4ever
******
******
Posts: 2630
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 3:55 pm
Location: charlotte nc

Post by redskinz4ever »

i'll get back with you after i see our starters and how we look in training camp ........
:shock: right now i say 16-0 :!: :!: :!: :!: :!:
TOUCHDOWN .....WASHINGTON REDSKINS !!!!
User avatar
Tacoma Redskin
Hog
Posts: 267
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Lake Tapps

Post by Tacoma Redskin »

I see us losing one division road game (hopefully not the Pukes, I think we can sweep them again) one game to one of the Cats (take your pick), a road game to the Bucs or Colts, and probably one game you would never expect us to lose.

I'll take 12-4!
vife
Hog
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:23 am

Post by vife »

19-0.... :)
User avatar
SkinzCanes
Hog
Posts: 1510
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 12:31 am

Post by SkinzCanes »

I think 11-5 or 12-4. There are always games that "should" be won but are lost. Just look at the loss last year againt the Raiders. I also think it's kinda crazy to think that we are going to sweep our division. That is one of the toughest things to do and I see us losing 1 or 2 division games this season. Chris I also think that you are underrating the Eagles a little bit. They had a ton of injuries last season and they just added Darren Howard to their defense. I think that we will end up winning the division but it wont be anywhere near as easy as some people think. One thing that hasn't been mentioned in this thread yet is the qb situation. If the coaching staff decides to start Campbell or if Brunell gets hurt then our season could be a lot different.
"Archuletta on the sidelines is a plus for Redskins fans" - Brian Mitchell
User avatar
hailskins666
aka Evil Hog
aka Evil Hog
Posts: 6481
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 9:01 am
Location: South of Heaven, trying to hit a toilet on shrooms
Contact:

Post by hailskins666 »

vife wrote:19-0.... :)
:rock: i'm on the kool-aid. :D
THN's resident jerk.

Glock .40 Model 22 - First* line of home defense.... 'ADT' is for liberals.
User avatar
skinsRin
Hog
Posts: 1143
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:44 pm
Location: HOG HEAVEN
Contact:

Post by skinsRin »

16-0 regular season and all the Fins fans and ex-1972 players will start crying! 3-0 in the playoffs beating the Broncos in the SB!
DON'T SING IT! BRING IT!
User avatar
andyjens89
Hog
Posts: 1881
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 10:15 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Our 2006 Opponents...lets discuss

Post by andyjens89 »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:Giants - SWEEP - They'll need 2 more DB's. They got Madison for Moss but they weren't counting on 2 more WR's they can't cover.


thats funny cuz madison is old and nowhere near as fast as moss
XVII XXII XXVI
spudstr04
spudstr04
spudstr04
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:13 am
Location: NC

Post by spudstr04 »

11-5 or may be 12-4...losses to Cowboys, Eagles, Panthers, Indy, and may be Bucs
#21 = Forever in our hearts
User avatar
die cowboys die
Hog
Posts: 2115
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 9:37 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Post by die cowboys die »

it's hard to imagine we're not at least 2 or 3 games better than last year. we could easily have won all but one game last year, but had critical breakdowns that cost us the game because they were so close. if we score one more touchdown a game we could easily go 15-1 or 16-0.
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

10-6 to play it safe but I think that we could really go 11-5. I think that New Orleans will be better than most people think as well as Houston. Its Indy I'm suspect about.
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

die cowboys die wrote:it's hard to imagine we're not at least 2 or 3 games better than last year. we could easily have won all but one game last year, but had critical breakdowns that cost us the game because they were so close. if we score one more touchdown a game we could easily go 15-1 or 16-0.


The ONLY game we outright lost imo was the 1st Giants game. That was a total collapse on both sides of the ball. Every other game was in reach of our offense last year but they often sputtered and died. If we can get more consistency from the offense this year we'll do fine. Mark Brunell almost has no excuse for not having somewhere to go with the ball.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
Warmother
~~~~~
~~~~~
Posts: 1426
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 7:54 am
Location: Finksburg MD
Contact:

Post by Warmother »

I think 13-3 or 12-4. With the losses coming from Colts, Iggles and Bucs. The only reason I say we lose to the Bucs is because that's how the the recent seris with them has gone. We win they win, it's their turn. Still I feel real good about our chances next year.
"I never apologize. I'm sorry but that's just the way I am."
Post Reply