Thats what they are saying now, everywhere, no cap. So, if this is true, the Redskins could go HOG WILD this offseason probably. Snyder is got major cash, and there is no doubt in my mind he would pick up some guys without a cap. I havent rad enough about the deal to know much, but would that mean this offseason no cap?
Redskins new yankees of football?
if no cap....
-
PatrickRamsey
- piggie
- Posts: 125
- youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 6:44 pm
- Location: Alexandria,VA
- Contact:
You definetly need to do some more reading. If the CBA isn't extended than there will be an uncapped year in 2007. So, in 2007 the Skins could go wild...but that also means that a number of our cap hits will be accelerated in 2006. It also means that there is a possibility of a strike year in 2008 if nothing gets done by then.
Chad
Chad
The best thing for the NFL and the Redskins is a new CBA. The current cap structure is the best in sports. The only change I'd like to see is a rookie cap, like the NBA. Reggie Bush will get a monster contract this year and the Texans hope and Pray that he's worth a $40-50-60 mil deal. Whatever it is, it will be wayyyy too much for a rookie RB.
I'd rather not see the NFL go to a situation where Danny doesn't have a cap. It would be too much like the Yankees and I don't like what George has done there. A payroll of $200 mil a year when Tampa Bay has a 20-30 mil payroll...there's just something not fair, or fun, about that.
Please get the new CBA done!
I'd rather not see the NFL go to a situation where Danny doesn't have a cap. It would be too much like the Yankees and I don't like what George has done there. A payroll of $200 mil a year when Tampa Bay has a 20-30 mil payroll...there's just something not fair, or fun, about that.
Please get the new CBA done!
-
PatrickRamsey
- piggie
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 6:44 pm
- Location: Alexandria,VA
- Contact:
-
MtSherwood7
- Hog
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:34 pm
- Location: Olney, Maryland
- Contact:
Re: if no cap....
PatrickRamsey wrote:Thats what they are saying now, everywhere, no cap. So, if this is true, the Redskins could go HOG WILD this offseason probably. Snyder is got major cash, and there is no doubt in my mind he would pick up some guys without a cap. I havent rad enough about the deal to know much, but would that mean this offseason no cap?
Redskins new yankees of football?
Um, whatever is stated in this above post, but the EXACT OPPOSITTE.
= Not good for us Skins fans...
joebagadonuts on IsaneBoost's signature:
-- "I laughed. I cried. Better than Cats"
-- "I laughed. I cried. Better than Cats"
-
darkwing99
- piggie
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:42 pm
- Location: Fort Meade, Maryland
However the players Union is getting greedy. They want sixty plus percent of the NFL total revenue allocated to players. That is pretty damn greedy in my opinion....greedy
The No. 1 problem hasn't changed: the league's owners can't agree on a revenue sharing plan amongst themselves – nor do they appear ready to meet the union's demand that 60-plus percent of total football revenues be earmarked for players. Boiled down, the NFLPA is looking for another $200-$300 million a year in league-wide cap space. That translates to slightly less than $10 million per year in additional cap space for each team.
When you make a mistake, don't look back at it long. Take the reason for the mistake into your mind, and then look forward. Mistakes are lessons of wisdom. The past cannot be changed. The future is yet in your power. - JORDAN
darkwing99 wrote:However the players Union is getting greedy. They want sixty plus percent of the NFL total revenue allocated to players. That is pretty damn greedy in my opinion....greedyThe No. 1 problem hasn't changed: the league's owners can't agree on a revenue sharing plan amongst themselves – nor do they appear ready to meet the union's demand that 60-plus percent of total football revenues be earmarked for players. Boiled down, the NFLPA is looking for another $200-$300 million a year in league-wide cap space. That translates to slightly less than $10 million per year in additional cap space for each team.
Either way, all I want for them is to get a deal done by Thursday. And knowing Gene Upshaw, he won't change his stance so now it's all on Paul T to just give in. I mean seriously, a higher cap is better than a strike.
Plus, if they don't strike a deal, we are in deep deep you know what.
joebagadonuts on IsaneBoost's signature:
-- "I laughed. I cried. Better than Cats"
-- "I laughed. I cried. Better than Cats"
[quote="air_hog"][quote]Either way, all I want for them is to get a deal done by Thursday. And knowing Gene Upshaw, he won't change his stance so now it's all on Paul T to just give in. I mean seriously, a higher cap is better than a strike.[quote]
I'd like to see a deal done - with caps for rookies. The CBA is great for the NFL. Its bad enough to pay for tickets now. Imagine what would happen if the flood gates were opened? Those costs get passed on to the fans! You'd have to be a millionare to take a family of four to one game!
But then, remember who won the SB the last time they had a strike year? ... Why we could even get Keenau Reves to play QB like he did in the movie ...
I'd like to see a deal done - with caps for rookies. The CBA is great for the NFL. Its bad enough to pay for tickets now. Imagine what would happen if the flood gates were opened? Those costs get passed on to the fans! You'd have to be a millionare to take a family of four to one game!
But then, remember who won the SB the last time they had a strike year? ... Why we could even get Keenau Reves to play QB like he did in the movie ...
