#2 Receiver in 2006

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?

Who will be the Redskins #2 receiver opposite Santana in 2006?

David Patten
25
30%
James Thrash
0
No votes
Taylor Jacobs
2
2%
Terrell Owens
2
2%
Draft Pick (Moss, Stovall, Williams, etc.)
12
14%
Reggie Wayne
7
8%
Antwaan Randle El
20
24%
Other
15
18%
 
Total votes: 83

SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

Justice Hog wrote:What Danny wants, Danny gets. It will be really cool to see Antwaan Randle El in the fold next year. Can't wait!

Gibbs is still calling the shots for now and I think he will "work" with the offensive caoches and try to find someone that will fit in with what they all want. IMO Snyder will continue to let Gibbs have his team for now.
I think that Patten may prove to be an asset and may want to make an impression but I am not sure he has the little extra to be a #2 - he will be a contributor though. I think we will have to be deeper at WR than we were this year.

I think though the main focus is going to be the depth on both lines. On both sides of the ball we have to have good linemen and some quality depth. I think that we will be better at both run blocking (and pass blocking) and we need to get some pressure on the opposing QB.
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

AZHog wrote:
Skinsfan55 wrote:Yeah, I'd give Koren Robinson another shot, he's a pretty physical guy who could compliment Moss...

But really, in an ideal situation I'd want Taylor Jacobs to improve.

I mean, he's a smart route runner, he has pretty good hands... he just needs to learn to be more physical and get stronger...

He could maximize his potential and really be a hell of a #2 I think.


Talk about a guy getting pushed around by defenders -- Jacobs seems scared of the ball at times! This guy just stinks -- he's got "stone hands" syndrome and seems to just shy away from making plays. I love his size but he's not worth putting anything more into.


I advocated for Jacobs all year. He got his chance and squandered it. He needs to go and get a change of scenery. I think Spurrier squandered his career and Ramseys. Both of these guys had potential but didn't get any good coaching during their development stages.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
portis26
Hog
Posts: 479
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 9:28 am
Location: thehogs.net

Post by portis26 »

skinsfano28 wrote:i like either notre dame guy, stovall or samardizja (sp?) unless sam. isnt coming out...in which case i still like stovall.

i also like calvin johnson from georgia tech, i think he's a senior and could be a 3rd rounder if we're lucky. he's got size and hands and adequate speed.


Calvin Johnson is a sophmore and will be a 5 pick when he comes out.
5 in a row or we don't go!
AZHog
Hog
Posts: 501
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:12 am
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ

Post by AZHog »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:I advocated for Jacobs all year. He got his chance and squandered it. He needs to go and get a change of scenery. I think Spurrier squandered his career and Ramseys. Both of these guys had potential but didn't get any good coaching during their development stages.


While I've heard the "Spurrier ruined (insert name here)" statment alot, I don't think it holds much water. Though we had pretty bad records those two years (7-9 & 5-11) we also had Champ & Lavar make the Probowl twice, and Coles made it once. Spurrier didn't ruin anyone, they really just couldn't play ball in that system -- one that's really not suited for NFL defenses. That's all.

Ramsey and Jacobs have both gotten two years to prove themselves in this new ball control/max protect offense with Gibbs. Ramsey had his starting opportunities but never impressed the coaching staff, as evidenced with Brunell's reinstatement. Jacobs was given every opportunity to shine with Patten out most of the year. He dropped a ton of balls and seemed to get pushed around by any defender in his way.

While I think Spurrier is a putz of a coach, I'm not thinking he ruined anyone. Ramsey and Jacobs are mediocure at best and it's strictly because of talent (or lack thereof). My 2 cents
"The biggest misrepresentation there is that [it's because] Dan's got a lot of money. That's not it," Gibbs said. "We've got a rule. Believe me, if we had no rules, Dan would spend some money."

— Bobby Beathard
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

When Spurrier and that whole bunch was here we didn't develop our younger guys. We just brought in peolpe to replace them. They weren't really given a chance.

Ive seen marked improvement in Ramsey since Gibbs has been here but his level is still below where we need it to be. Ramseys too old for his level of development and I think he either was stagnant or regressed under Spurrier.

We've been saying how our current coaching staff is so great and I dont doubt for one second that their ability to develop players is way more advanced than a college coach who was always given the best of the best via recruiting.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
User avatar
xhadow
Hog
Posts: 1017
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:22 pm
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Contact:

Post by xhadow »

John Manfreda wrote:Randel El is not going to leave the Steelers. I live in Steeler country right now. The Steelers are going to pay him and he is going to stay.


The steelers aren't known for keeping players at any cost (see Plaxico Burris). Randle El would be a nice fit and an extremly dangerous #2 threat. Freeing up the double teams that Moss and Cooley saw later in the year. Not only that but it would make for a nasty double reverse or screen reverse threat.
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

AZHog, did you REALLY just say that Ramsey got two years to prove himself in the ball control/max protect offense??

C'mon now,

He had half a year in 2004 when we were out of it and the first half of the first game in 2005... how does that equal two seasons?

I for one never agreed with Coach Gibbs decision to bring in Mark Brunell (especially not at that price) and it may yet come back to haunt us. In 2003 Patrick Ramsey completed 53% of his passes for 2,166 yards, 14 TD's 9 INTS in 11 games... those were pretty good numbers, yet he was replaced...

Then when Brunnell was mercifully taken out of the lineup Ramsey came in and did pretty well learning a new offense pretty much on the fly...

He was promised the starting job directly after the season for 2005 but Joe Gibbs, while no liar (I think of lying as having malice behind it) the coach certainly had a change of heart.

It worked out in the end, but Ramsey wasn't treated too well by this team. Yet he was the good soldier and cheered the team success even though he knew that he wasn't going to be getting the ball.

I wish him luck someplace else, I'll always be a fan of his... until he plays Washington, lol.


But I don't want anyone to get me wrong, I am glad to have a QB of the future hand picked by Coach Joe Gibbs.
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
crazyhorse1
ch1
ch1
Posts: 3634
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:01 pm
Location: virginia beach

Post by crazyhorse1 »

xhadow wrote:
John Manfreda wrote:Randel El is not going to leave the Steelers. I live in Steeler country right now. The Steelers are going to pay him and he is going to stay.


The steelers aren't known for keeping players at any cost (see Plaxico Burris). Randle El would be a nice fit and an extremly dangerous #2 threat. Freeing up the double teams that Moss and Cooley saw later in the year. Not only that but it would make for a nasty double reverse or screen reverse threat.


Randle El has always looked great to me. Somebody explain to me why he has such lousy stats.
PulpExposure
Pushing Paper
Pushing Paper
Posts: 4860
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:01 pm

Post by PulpExposure »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:When Spurrier and that whole bunch was here we didn't develop our younger guys. We just brought in peolpe to replace them. They weren't really given a chance.


In general, I agree with you about Spurrier. But I absolutely think it's wrong with Taylor Jacobs.

Jacobs was coached/developed by Spurrier at Florida, to be a 2nd round draft pick. The guy entered and played in the same system in the NFL he was in college.

He got banged up, and it slowed his progress a lot. But when given the chance by Gibbs, he didn't show any heart. That's mostly what it came down to, for me. Coming back to get the ball when poorly thrown...he just gave up. He wouldn't fight for the ball, or to get open.

Randle El has always looked great to me. Somebody explain to me why he has such lousy stats.


#2 WR on a team that completed 228 passes on the year. Hines Ward got 70 of them. Randle-El got 35 (he caught 5 balls once this year, as his high mark). Cedric Wilson got 26.

It's what you expect when you are in a run heavy offense.
User avatar
runbillo
piggie
Posts: 112
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 4:45 pm
Location: Staten Island New York

Post by runbillo »

Remember we are talking about a number 2 wide out. Patten was doing well until he got hurt. Give him a chance.
A pig must be over 185lbs before he can be called a Hog!
Post Reply