Brunell v. Sea Pass Defense

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Brunell v. Sea Pass Defense

Post by The Hogster »

I hope the past two games played by the Seahawk pass defense will shut up some of us who keep trying to say that Brunell cost us a chance for a Superbowl.

Delhomme and Rothlisberger were both made ordinary against that defense. They deserve a lot of credit. We also saw how even a great young QB will make some mistakes in the Superbowl.

This game ironically should calm some of our nerves about how capable Brunell is. In the entire playoffs, his 242 yds and a TD were by far the best performance against the Seahawk defense. I know some of you will find a negative in that regardless, but I think it should be said that we are very close to being a Superbowl team this year, and if we put the right pieces in place, we may be looking at Brunell retiring after a ring next year.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
User avatar
Jake
Junior Hog
Junior Hog
Posts: 11253
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 4:18 am
Location: Mayo, Maryland
Contact:

Post by Jake »

Their defense was awesome in the first quarter-and-a-half. Then both D's started to tail off as the game went on.

I was real impressed by how they started. They got caught with that gadget play that killed them in the end.
RIP Sean Taylor 1983-2007
RIP Kevin Mitchell 1971-2007
RIP Justin Skaggs 1979-2007
RIP Sammy Baugh 1914-2008

RIP JPFair
RIP VetSkinsFan

#60 Chris Samuels: 6-time 6-time 6-time 6-time 6-time 6-time Pro Bowl left tackle!
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky
Posts: 4730
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Surfside
Contact:

Post by SkinsFreak »

I think we should keep Brunell. He will make a great back-up next year. :D
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

SkinsFreak wrote:I think we should keep Brunell. He will make a great back-up next year. :D


Please dont turn this into a Brunell/Campbell thread. There are tons of those if you go search.

Brunell did very well considering the circumstances.
1. Only one WR.
2. Cooley being shut down
3. Running game shutdown
4. Randy Thomas out
5. Ray Brown out
6. Constant pressure

Nobody seems to care about those variables, just the fact that we lost.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
DEHog
Diesel
Diesel
Posts: 7425
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:03 pm
Location: FedEx Field
Contact:

Post by DEHog »

This just in..The Seahawks D is good. Give credit where credit is do, there are good and they are young.
"Sean Taylor is hands down the best athlete I've ever coached it's not even close" Gregg Williams 2005 Mini-Camp
User avatar
rick301
Hog
Posts: 655
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 11:10 am
Location: Columbia, MD

Post by rick301 »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
SkinsFreak wrote:I think we should keep Brunell. He will make a great back-up next year. :D
...

Brunell did very well considering the circumstances.
1. Only one WR.
2. Cooley being shut down
3. Running game shutdown
4. Randy Thomas out
5. Ray Brown out
6. Constant pressure

Nobody seems to care about those variables, just the fact that we lost.


Its not only about completing passes but more than that. Its about turning nothing into a play. How many times did Brunell take the safe option and throw away? We need a QB to scramble and make somethng happen.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

I would just like to repeat that IMO we are one of the better teams in the NFC.

I have no axe to grind with Seattle as far as beating us but I do not think that they are the best team in the NFC. They happened to win the games that got them into the SB but that's all. However I would agree that their D is one of the better defences in the NFC but they are still fortunate to be in that division.

As many of you know I've been trying to make the point all season that the NFL recently has become very even at the top half of both the NFC and the AFC. I am just really pleased with how far we have come in the past 2 seasons and the fact that Gibbs is looking at not just being in the playoffs but staying there.

From what we saw in the game against Seattle we do have some areas to address this off season but we are hopefully going to be seeing a lot of the key players back next season and IMO we will be even better.
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
gilbertarenas
piggie
Posts: 186
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 12:21 am

Post by gilbertarenas »

Rothlisberger did enough to help his team; hence he is the better quarterback.
Brandon777
*********
*********
Posts: 1185
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:23 pm
Location: Fayetteville, NC

Re: Brunell v. Sea Pass Defense

Post by Brandon777 »

The Hogster wrote:Delhomme and Rothlisberger were both made ordinary against that defense.


Actually, Delhomme and Big Ben looked horrid. But I agree with your post about Brunell.
Let us all gather around and drink the Cooley-Aid of the Redskins.
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

rick301 wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
SkinsFreak wrote:I think we should keep Brunell. He will make a great back-up next year. :D
...

Brunell did very well considering the circumstances.
1. Only one WR.
2. Cooley being shut down
3. Running game shutdown
4. Randy Thomas out
5. Ray Brown out
6. Constant pressure

Nobody seems to care about those variables, just the fact that we lost.


Its not only about completing passes but more than that. Its about turning nothing into a play. How many times did Brunell take the safe option and throw away? We need a QB to scramble and make somethng happen.


What did you want him to do? Seriously. Its a team sport and the guy had no one to throw it to. I hope you know that Jason isn't that fast either.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
User avatar
hkHog
Hog
Posts: 1912
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:06 pm

Post by hkHog »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:I hope you know that Jason isn't that fast either.


Niether are Roethlesburger, Mcnabb or Culpepper but they are still good running QBs. Campbell is just as big and athletic as those guys. Campbell will have no problem keeping plays alive with his feet or running with the ball. He sheds tacklers really well and for his size he most certainly can run. Just because he isn't as fast as Vick doesn't mean he isn't a mobile QB, quite the contrary, he can really run.
"We're not going to be the pushovers of the NFL, we're gonna push over some people!" - Clinton Portis
Post Reply