What in all likelihood was LaVar Arrington's last day in the home locker room after a regular season game at FedEx Field featured an ugly shouting match in the training room with his position coach, Dale Lindsey. Arrington had grown tired of Lindsey, the linebackers coach, calling him from upstairs in the booth, berating him for missed assignments in a victory over the New York Giants on Saturday.
He finally hung up on Lindsey, and the feud carried over into the locker room, growing more profane and personal. It ended with Arrington telling Lindsey to "Back off!" and "Treat me like a man!" According to two persons privy to the altercation, the coach went a tad more overboard than the player.
Reason #1: As fans we do not know what preceded this reported argument over the course of the season and are therefore not in a position to put it into a wider context. Wise tries to manipulate us into taking Arrington's side, but in fact we do not have all the facts.
"I was thinking, 'Enough already,' " said one player, on condition of anonymity. "Let LaVar be."
What a fitting send-off for Arrington, the guy who carried Daniel Snyder's banner during the lean years. Beautiful. Way to emotionally beat down a proud, sentimental veteran whose only real character flaw was that he stubbornly believed enough in this organization to want to retire here.
Reason #2: Let LeVar be? Are we supposed to agree with this? As LuvaLuva says "Screw Lavar. If he's blowing assignments then he needs to get beaten just like everyone else. This isn't playtime with Spurrier." What is the priority here? To win football games or to stoke the ego of a superstar whose former teammates (i.e. Trotter) says that he has always had trouble playing within the scheme?
This town is a win from going absolutely ga-ga over Joe Gibbs's team again. Beat the Eagles on Sunday and Gibbs secures a postseason berth for Washington for the first time since 1999. "Ten and six" must sound so much better than 6-10 to the true zealot. What a phenomenal, 12-month turnabout that would be.
But let's not forget the marginalization of Arrington, the franchise's most popular player of the new millennium.
Reason #3: Excuse me, but what the fans want is a winning team, and until Gibbs arrived, Arrington's leadership was not enough to produce enough wins. Why can't Wise recognize the obvious. Why should everyone pander to LaVar's popularity?
The spin being put out on Arrington's latest comments is frankly amazing. Many are ripping the guy who told the Washington Times this week that management didn't want him, that he was most likely done in Washington. People are treating Arrington as if he were a T.O. clone, creating controversy, stirring the pot on the brink of the franchise's most important game in years.
No one is talking about how in two humiliating years, Mr. Redskin was callously turned into Mr. Irrelevant.
Reason #4: Damn right, Mr. Wise. We are not focused on how the last two years have been for our highest paid player. We're thinking about the Philadelphia game and the possibility of making of the playoffs for the first time in 5 years. Do you really think we have our priorities wrong?
Hampered by injury and the lack of confidence his coaches have in him, Arrington rarely plays on third and fourth downs anymore. On many Sunday afternoons, when the opposing offense is facing a third and long, Arrington sits. Never mind that he is bigger and faster than Fred Dean was lining up at defensive end for the great 49ers teams of the 1980s, Arrington's pass-rushing skills are somehow deemed too insignificant to help a blitzing, aggressive defense.
Reason #5: The man completely misses the point. What has LaVar's individual aggressiveness doen for for the team in the last 5 years? How many playoff appearances have there been? Is it possible that being bigger and faster than Fred Dean isn't enough?
When Arrington is given a fair amount of snaps, the masses are informed that it has nothing to do with Arrington playing the way that earned him two Pro Bowl selections. No, they say LaVar got religion, believed in the principles of defensive coach Gregg Williams's system, finally put in the rehab and film time needed to be rewarded with more playing opportunities.
Arrington was asked about a moment he thought his career changed in Washington. He was reminded of a Wizards game last season. His face was flashed on the overhead video scoreboard and was greeted by intermittent boos. He was taking the heat for his team's dismal season. After the game, Arrington waited patiently as the crowd filed out. He had arranged to get a pair of signed shoes from a visiting NBA player. MCI Center security guards would not let him back near the locker rooms. The most popular athlete in town was treated like a deranged fan demanding to be let in the locker room for an autograph.
Arrington got angry and emotional before his future wife calmed him down. The next day, he canceled his season tickets. Was his love affair with Washington already dying?
"No, the town never turned on me," he said, sitting in front of his locker at the team's practice facility in Ashburn on Wednesday. "They were always behind me. It was individuals. That's all I'm going to say."
He won't say who, but we already know where and with whom the enmity began. Snyder, the team owner who made him fabulously rich and befriended his charismatic, handsome linebacking star, dumped him quicker than AOL stock. From the moment Arrington filed a contract grievance in March 2004, contending the team omitted $6.5 million in bonus money agreed upon for the 2006 season, he was shuttled out of Snyder' suite and sent to the doghouse. The Redskins said they did not owe Arrington the money, and the linebacker eventually dropped the arbitration case.
Reason #6: Follow the media herd and blame everything on Snyder. Bottom line is that Lavar's lawyer screwed up and LaVar should have sued his lawyer for malpractice rather than turn on the team. The guy signed a contract that apparently neither he nor his lawyer read. How can you blame Snyder for that?
But with Snyder no longer in his corner, it became open season on Arrington for the coaching staff.
Reason #7: What a cheap shot at the coaching staff!!!
When Arrington was hardly playing in late September and early October this season, he saw Snyder in a hallway and was about to offer some pleasantries. "Don't talk to me," the owner said, according to a person who saw the encounter. "I didn't have anything to do with this."
Reason #8: Given the existing contract dispute, I am not surprised that Snyder started off the discussion my making clear that he was not meddling in any coaching decisions. As hailskins666 says "So basically this article says that gibbs is running this team not snyder...... whats the problem?" If Snyder was just saying "I am not involved in any coaching decisions, then, Mr. Wise, what is the problem?
When Gibbs and his coaching staff took over the team two years ago, they did not consider Arrington to be part of the solution to the franchise's woes; they saw him as another impediment. They believed Arrington could not curb his individualism for the good of the team. They never got around the perception that he could not fit in. They saw Arrington as a nuisance -- a high-maintenance, high-salaried star who could never live up to his Pro Bowl aura or reputation.
As effective and bright as the team's coaches are, they decided who Arrington was and what he was about before they gave him a chance to see what he could become. And when he finally showed them his worth, his body betrayed him again. He played only two full games last season and missed 12 games with a bone bruise.
Reason #9: Another unwarranted cheap shot at the coaching staff!!! Are these guys really to stupid to evaluate players based on their performance? I can hardly believe Wise had the gall to write that. It is an unbelievably cheap shot, especially considering that we are not privy to any of the discussions among the coaches.
The injury cost Arrington a shot at proving his worth to Williams and his staff. They moved on and inserted lesser-known players, and the defense turned in one of its best years in recent memory. Returning from offseason knee surgery robbed him of his explosiveness this season. He wasn't their cup of tea to begin with, and his ailments made it that much easier to cast him aside.
Arrington's representatives asked that they be allowed to speak with other teams about a possible trade early this season, but were rebuffed both times. Now, it wouldn't be a surprise if the team waited until mid-July to cut him, after every other franchise has run out of salary-cap room.
Was Arrington also to blame for this pending divorce between player and team? No doubt. He is an emotionally deep, feeling person. If he was being honest with himself, Arrington would admit he took things too personally, internalized every slight, felt his loyalty and accomplishments before Gibbs was hired were completely overlooked by the new regime.
He hated the perception that he was only a freelancing, headhunter, unable to coexist in a defense built on elaborate schemes that demands on-field discipline from its players. It made him look book-smart and system-dumb.
But when your face stops appearing in the team's marketing campaigns, when they don't restock your jersey in the team store until the demand becomes overwhelming, when the assistant gets in your face like you're the walk-on, the writing is on the wall.
Crazy, no? Most people in the organization believe they learned to win without Arrington. They have no idea that they won in spite of how they treated him.
Reason #10: For a fact, we do not know how Arrington was treated. We do not know what the coaches said to him (thankfully they seem to have the tact to not aire dirty laundry in public). We do not know how he responded in meetings. We do not have enough facts to judge. Please tell us, Mr. Wise, which facts you know that you haven't reported in the Post that make you so confident in your judgment.
And a bonus Reason #11: I feel that Mike Wise and the WP are upset that the Washington Times beat them to the punch on the LA story, so they have to come up with something to say. Because they have nothing to say, they grope at straws, fall back on their tendency to demonize Snyder, take sides without reporting all the facts, and take the focus off where it should be, which is the Philadelphia game. I defend Elfin and I respect the job he did in breaking the story that ran in the Times. But I have alsolutely no respect for Wise after this column.
Wise article confirms what many of us have been saying... Gibbs is running the show and calling the shots. Gibbs wasn't accused of anything in this article and Linsey was doing what he is paid to do.
We are in the HEAT of the playoff hunt and he can't take direction because he feels he isn't being treated like a man while playing a game that brings him millions.
