Should Ramsey have been put in?

Art_Monk · Post by **Art_Monk** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:02 pm

Do you all think Ramsey was the right call?

joebagadonuts · Post by **joebagadonuts** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:05 pm

if you put campbell in, you might as well trade ramsey now, because his confidence would be shot. not even good enough (in joe's eyes) to pick up junk time.

gottoloveit · Post by **gottoloveit** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:07 pm

he sucks too - your whole team isnt very good - you need to start at square one again

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:11 pm

I think we should have stayed with Brunell...looked like we gave up by taking out the entire team.

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:20 pm

Seemed like a good way to get Ramsey some playing time, and we were so far behind it's not like he'd feel pressure to try to get big plays.

Punu · Post by **Punu** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:22 pm

he sucks too - your whole team isnt very good - you need to start at square one again

What!?! Dont get carried away cuz we had a bad game. I know it's probably the worst anyone has ever seen, but were still solid. Our Running game is better than philly, our passing game is still just as good and our defense is better. We will be in fedex next week... we dont need to start from square one, you on the other hand actually need to sit down realize that philly has had thier chances and have blown over 4 oppurnities to either go to the SB or win it... but that's all over now...the NFC east is back and philly will not dominate for a long time to come like have in the past 5 years. Your in denial and I cant blame you for that, though I must say it's rather pathetic. :lol:

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:24 pm

Punu wrote:
he sucks too - your whole team isnt very good - you need to start at square one again

What!?! Dont get carried away cuz we had a bad game. I know it's probably the worst anyone has ever seen, but were still solid. Our Running game is better than philly, our passing game is still just as good and our defense is better. We will be in fedex next week... we dont need to start from square one, you on the other hand actually need to sit down realize that philly has had thier chances and have blown over 4 oppurnities to either go to the SB or win it... but that's all over now...the NFC east is back and philly will not dominate for a long time to come like have in the past 5 years. Your in denial and I cant blame you for that, though I must say it's rather pathetic.

Don't feed the troll.

kkryan · Post by **kkryan** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:26 pm

gottoloveit wrote:he sucks too - your whole team isnt very good - you need to start at square one again

way to go with arizona...beat a good team and come back here

Punu · Post by **Punu** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:33 pm

Don't feed the troll.

sorry...your right I shouldnt, but it was too easy.

REDEEMEDSKIN · Post by **REDEEMEDSKIN** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:33 pm

Art_Monk wrote:Do you all think Ramsey was the right call?

Absolutely.

Ramsey, comin'off the bench, gave us a spark. It was a blowout, and Joe needde to do SOMETHING to get the team to play. TRO was rooting for Patrick when the #8 car was benched, and he looked quite good. If not for Robert Royal, I think Ramsey would have made that game respectable.

Kudos to Joe, as well, for being aggressive on that 4th down call. If we had gone for the field goal, that really would have signaled that the team had given up.

Brunell will bounce back next week, and the offense will respond in kind.

Brandon777 · Post by **Brandon777** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:35 pm

The way our O-line played, I'm sure Gibbs didn't want to risk an injury to our starting QB in a lost cause, a cause that was lost before the ball was snapped. This was a trap game.

REDEEMEDSKIN · Post by **REDEEMEDSKIN** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:38 pm

Brandon777 wrote:This was a trap game.

Trade a "c" for the "t"in "trap", and you hit the nail on the head. ](*,)

Jake · Post by **Jake** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 3:23 pm

I think Ramsey should have been put in. It gives Brunell time to heal for next week while Patrick has flashbacks of 2002-week 1 2005.

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 3:34 pm

Of course it was right to put Ramsey in. No way do you feed a rookie qb to the lions in a game like that.

Uaintready · Post by **Uaintready** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 5:15 pm

I used to be a big Ramsey supporter but he just showed me that he is nothing but a back up, all he does is stand in the pocket and get hit. He has been in the leauge for 4 years and still makes the same mistakes, if anything we shold have put Campbell to get him some more experience.

Art_Monk wrote:Do you all think Ramsey was the right call?

REDEEMEDSKIN · Post by **REDEEMEDSKIN** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 5:18 pm

Uaintready wrote:I used to be a big Ramsey supporter but he just showed me that he is nothing but a back up, all he does is stand in the pocket and get hit. He has been in the leauge for 4 years and still makes the same mistakes, if anything we shold have put Campbell to get him some more experience.

To "The Back-up One's" credit, he had a scramble that can only be described as "cute", that, I believe gained us a chunk of yards. I think he did merely okay. Certainly not a world beater, but, in a pinch, he looks like he might be ready to play.

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:21 pm

I agree on the points that you made. We shouldn't have risked any serious injuries, but I think it would have been a bit more of a lift if we could have at least scored in the game.

We could have stayed in D.C. and not gotten anyone hurt and still lost "Something to Nothing".

REDEEMEDSKIN · Post by **REDEEMEDSKIN** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:23 pm

The Hogster wrote:...but I think it would have been a bit more of a lift if we could have at least scored in the game.

Robert Royal.... :explode:

HailSkins94 · Post by **HailSkins94** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 8:20 pm

I hate to say it but I hope Brunell's calf is not hurting him because it looked an awful lot like it was yesterday. That was a game stright out of last year. He was a sitting duck in the pocket, couldn't move, looked old, threw 5 yard passes, etc. Hopefully his calf isn't bothering him more than they are saying. They didn't let anyone know last year, so there is no reason to believe they would this year. I just pray it was just one bad game and he is healthy.

die cowboys die · Post by **die cowboys die** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 1:59 am

HailSkins94 wrote:I hate to say it but I hope Brunell's calf is not hurting him because it looked an awful lot like it was yesterday. That was a game stright out of last year. He was a sitting duck in the pocket, couldn't move, looked old, threw 5 yard passes, etc. Hopefully his calf isn't bothering him more than they are saying. They didn't let anyone know last year, so there is no reason to believe they would this year. I just pray it was just one bad game and he is healthy.

if brunell isn't healthy, i will personally organize a lynch mob to storm the field and beat him until he can't even stand anymore. i refuse to watch another 2004. gibbs has a responsibility to make sure that never, EVER happens again- which means benching brunell if he's not healthy.

obviously i hope he is though, since he's been playing great until that turdfest on sunday.

Gibbs4Life · Post by **Gibbs4Life** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:00 am

Ramsey owns the Giants and would have had a td if RR had any skills...So I'm assuming Brunell is the guy right?

coachKarl · Post by **coachKarl** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:05 am

Ramsey did fine, they knew he was going to pass, he should have had a TD pass. He just needs to play.

gus · Post by **gus** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:55 pm

Gibbs had to give him playing time. Nothing was working anyway.... :explode:

HaiL,

Redskin in Canada · Post by **Redskin in Canada** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:27 pm

Glad Ramsey came in and he played well. Go Ramsey!

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 11:35 pm

We have 9 games to go. I think Ramsey will help this team make the playoffs this year.

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Should Ramsey have been put in?

Should Ramsey have been put in?

Re: Should Ramsey have been put in?

Re: Should Ramsey have been put in?

Re: Should Ramsey have been put in?

Who's QB