USAToday: Inside Slant

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
User avatar
ANT7088
~~~~
~~~~
Posts: 2098
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Yonkers, N.Y.

USAToday: Inside Slant

Post by ANT7088 »

LaVar Arrington, who has slipped from Pro Bowl perennial to afterthought in Washington this season, is already envisioning being an ex-Redskin.

"I know I can still play at a very high level," said Arrington, who played just seven snaps the past two games as Washington edged Dallas and Seattle. "It's just a matter if I get to do it here or if I do it somewhere else. If the direction is going away from me and going towards other things, then as a man, I have to accept that. I have to move on and figure out what's next for me."

Coach Joe Gibbs said he can understand why fans are surprised that Arrington, who's healthy again after missing most of 2004 with a balky right knee, is playing so little.

"I know he's disappointed about not making more of an impact, not playing more," said Gibbs, who met with Arrington yesterday. "It's something we just have to work our way through. We've got a lot of talented guys on our defense who can do a lot of things for us. Lots of times our blitzing comes from the secondary. Our defensive schemes try to use all of our people. Last year, LaVar went through a tough injury thing. This year, he's not a starter. It revolves then around the packages and how much (his) packages are called."

Arrington, like so many Washingtonians, doesn't really know why he apparently doesn't fit Williams' system as well as new starter Warrick Holdman or pass-rushing specialist Chris Clemons.

"Yeah I'm surprised," Arrington said. "Do I hate being off the field? Of course, I hate not playing, but I don't make those decisions. We're 3-0, so obviously we're doing something right. I don't want my situation to become a distraction, a problem. I love my teammates too much for that.

"By no means am I going to sit here and whine and complain and throw tirades," Arrington added. "I have a challenge in front of me and I'll continue to try to be a professional. I understand that it needs to be reported for what I stand for within this organization and this community. But I don't need this to be an ongoing soap opera. 'Why isn't LaVar playing? What's wrong with LaVar?'"

But in Washington, where Arrington remains the most popular Redskin despite starting just two games since 2003, it's a big story.

The eight-year, $68 million contract that Arrington signed in December 2003 makes getting rid of him this winter very difficult since the more than $11 million worth of his signing bonus would all accelerate onto the 2006 salary cap. Trading or cutting Arrington after June 1 would put about $2 million of those costs on next year's cap with the remaining $9 million deferred until 2007.

Arrington is a Pittsburgh native and he's the kind of no-holds-barred linebacker whom Steelers coach Bill Cowher likes. However, Pittsburgh has always been loathe to devote mega-millions on particular players. San Diego's Marty Schottenheimer was a big Arrington fan when he coached the Redskins in 2001 and although the Chargers drafted Maryland end/linebacker Shawne Merriman in the first round this year, they could still be a possibility for No. 56.

NOTES, QUOTES

—First-round pick Carlos Rogers made his starting debut against Seattle in place of injured cornerback Walt Harris. The ninth pick in April's draft made some mistakes, but wound up with seven tackles, one of which forced a fumble by Seahawks standout running back Shaun Alexander.

"It's always special to go out there with the first group and know you're starting, but you just have to relax and stay calm," Rogers said. "You go out there too over-psyched, things can happen to you. The first two series, I played a little too deep on certain things. Their play-action and quick game got me off stride a little bit, but once I settled down, everything was all right."

—Ryan Clark started the final 11 games of 2004 at strong safety after Matt Bowen suffered a season-ending knee injury, but Clark missed so much time this summer with a bad knee that he was inactive the first two games. However, with Pierson Prioleau out with a bad hamstring, Clark surprisingly got the nod over Bowen against Seattle. Clark was beaten by Darrell Jackson on a 6-yard slant that tied the game with 1:23 left in regulation, but was all smiles after the victory.

"I got a little tired because I hadn't played in a while, but for the first game, I think I did pretty well," said Clark, who had re-injured his knee in the Sept. 1 preseason finale at Baltimore. "I got beat on that play. I was thinking something else and they ran against my leverage. But I directed the traffic pretty well."

Clark and Bowen ended up playing together in the stretch drive after starting free safety Sean Taylor left the game with a sore shoulder. Taylor said he'll be fine for this week's game at Denver.

—Cornerback Shawn Springs played his first seven seasons in Seattle. Sunday's game was his first against his old teammates.

"I had mixed emotions," Springs said. "I had close, personal ties with a lot of those guys, but I didn't talk to any of them before the game. I had a little insight into their players, so I could talk to my teammates (about how to play them). I'm glad to win this one. I love being here in Washington."

PLAYER PERSONNEL NOTES

—Ailing K John Hall (quadricep) kicked some field goals on Monday, but isn't expected to regain his job from new Redskins hero Nick Novak until he shows he can kick off and make field goals consistently without pain after being hurt five times in the past two seasons.

—CB Walt Harris wasn't able to work out again on Monday because of an injured left calf. Harris' availability for Sunday's game at Denver is very much in question.

—SS Pierson Prioleau hasn't practiced since straining a hamstring on the Cowboys' opening drive last Monday. Prioleau was inactive against Seattle, but coach Joe Gibbs said he did some work on Monday. Ryan Clark started in Prioleau's place against the Seahawks.

—FS Sean Taylor left the Seattle game in the fourth quarter when the shoulder he bruised in Dallas became too painful. Taylor is expected to practice this week and play in Denver.

—Rookie LB Zak Keasey, waived on Friday so the Redskins could promote rookie CB Dmitri Patterson from the practice squad because of the injuries to Walt Harris and Pierson Prioleau, returned to the team on Monday.

STRATEGY AND PERSONNEL

REPORT CARD VS. SEAHAWKS

PASSING OFFENSE: B-plus — QB Mark Brunell was what coach Joe Gibbs likes to call super-efficient. Brunell completed 20 passes to seven different receivers, finding six of them for first downs. The seventh, tight end Mike Sellers, caught the game-winning touchdown pass. Brunell was the major reason why the Redskins were an unreal 13-of-18 on third downs, including his 18-yard scramble on third-and-9 in overtime. Brunell's only interception bounced off the hands of RB Clinton Portis. WR Santana Moss made some fine catches early on, almost pulled off a spectacular touchdown grab in the back left corner of the end zone and got free for the 30-yard catch that set up Nick Novak's game-winning field goal in overtime. WR James Thrash had two first-down catches. Brunell and WR David Patten are still trying to find their chemistry. TEs Robert Royal and Mike Sellers had touchdown grabs, and Brunell and H-back Chris Cooley got on the same page for four catches totaling 61 yards. Portis whiffed on LB Lofa Tatupu's sack of Brunell, but after giving up an early sack, the pass protection was excellent.

RUSHING OFFENSE: C — Portis didn't have a truly big day or a truly big run, but despite some neglible runs, he still managed a respectable 90 yards on 25 carries. RB Ladell Betts added some inside yards. However, the line didn't open many holes for Portis.

PASS DEFENSE: B-minus — For the most part, top draft pick Carlos Rogers looked like a rookie making his first start at cornerback. Ex-Seahawks corner Shawn Springs was effective, as were Ryan Clark and Matt Bowen while filling in for the injured Pierson Prioleau, although Clark was beaten on the game-tying touchdown with just 1:23 left. Safety Sean Taylor missed the last part of the game after injuring a shoulder. Lemar Marshall had a sack and Chris Clemons provided some pressure while filling most of the playing time that LaVar Arrington figured to take. As usual, the front four provided virtually no pass rush.

RUSH DEFENSE:
B — The front four dominated most of the day against a solid Seattle offensive line that includes perennial Pro Bowl LT Walter Jones, but wore down late. Marcus Washington wasn't as much of a factor as a Pro Bowl 'backer should be against standout Seahawks RB Shaun Alexander. The LBs were partly to blame for Seattle's two long touchdown drives in the second half.

SPECIAL TEAMS: B — Rookie Nick Novak had the first field goal try of his career blocked, but bounced back to make a 40-yarder before nailing the game-winning 39-yarder in OT. Punter Derrick Frost was fine in his Redskins debut. The coverage units were excellent. The Redskins didn't do anything in the return game.

COACHING: B — Almost everything Joe Gibbs called on third-and-long worked and he continues to rotate his skill position players wisely. He lost his replay challenge, but unlike some of last year's challenges, this one was worth challenging. It was a rare tough day for assistant head coach Gregg Williams' defense, but it still yielded just 17 points. Why Williams won't play three-time Pro Bowl LB LaVar Arrington over non-factor Warrick Holdman is baffling, especially when the Seahawks went on those long touchdown drives. The field goal protection broke down once up the middle, but otherwise, special teams coach Danny Smith held his own.


http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football ... s/home.htm
AnTsSkInZ
User avatar
hkHog
Hog
Posts: 1912
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:06 pm

Post by hkHog »

So, that's cool, we were just below a B average. That is fair. Good thing ST will be back.
"We're not going to be the pushovers of the NFL, we're gonna push over some people!" - Clinton Portis
User avatar
ANT7088
~~~~
~~~~
Posts: 2098
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Yonkers, N.Y.

Post by ANT7088 »

ST will be back, I don't know about Lavar though!
AnTsSkInZ
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

LaVar needs to play more!

He is easily the most talented defensive player on the team, and he's being wasted! :(
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
User avatar
BernieSki
Hog
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 8:39 am
Location: Ashburn, VA

Post by BernieSki »

I personally think Greg Williams is a fool for not playing Levar. He is clearly a much better player and will have a greater impact on the game, then any of our current linebackers. There is a power play going on here and someone has to give for the best interest of the team.
BernSki
User avatar
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~
Posts: 8496
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Post by REDEEMEDSKIN »

More and more, I am liking our upgrade at #24:

Cornerback Shawn Springs played his first seven seasons in Seattle. Sunday's game was his first against his old teammates.

"I had mixed emotions," Springs said. "I had close, personal ties with a lot of those guys, but I didn't talk to any of them before the game. I had a little insight into their players, so I could talk to my teammates (about how to play them). I'm glad to win this one. I love being here in Washington."


Talk about a TEAM PLAYER!!!:up:
Back and better than ever!
User avatar
nuskins
piggie
Posts: 188
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: C.T. WV

Post by nuskins »

BernieSki wrote:I personally think Greg Williams is a fool for not playing Levar. He is clearly a much better player and will have a greater impact on the game, then any of our current linebackers. There is a power play going on here and someone has to give for the best interest of the team.


After listening to Coach Gibbs address reporters yesterday it is rather clear that this is nothing more than a power play on the coaches part, more specifically Coach Williams part. Coach Gibbs really did not have a good answer to why Lavar is not playing other than saying that he is only in certain "schemes". In fact Gibbs looked uncomfortable talking about it and could do nothing more than say over and over that he is not playing b/c he is not in the "schemes". He also pointed out that it is soleley the Defenses Coach discretion what "schemes" they use, so it obviously points to Williams simply not including Lavar in the schemes. Personally it is mind blowing to me that Williams has decided not to play him.

Lavar has not done anymore complaining than any other pro bowler would do in his situation and I think he has a right to speak his mind. This seems like personal spat between him and Williams. Lavar has always been a team player, many people on this board will say otherwise but I ask them how long have they been fans of the Redskins? Have they not watched Lavar throughout his career here or what? It doesn't seem so by some of the comments made.

IMO opinion, and it's nothing more than that, I think Coach Williams is doing a disservice to the team by not playing one of the most disruptive LB in the game. Lavar is a Redskin through and through, always has been, long before Williams was. He has played his gutts out for this team through many losing seasons and coaching shuffles. He deserves to be in the game, he should be in the game, and it's a grave error that he is not b/c of a power trip by Williams. Our D is good, not great. The D does not get any turnovers and Gibbs is constantly talking about the turnover ratio. The best way the Redskins can get that ratio better in the short term is to put Lavar in. We all know that, including the coaches. Which makes the situation even worse.
User avatar
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~
Posts: 8496
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Post by REDEEMEDSKIN »

nuskins wrote:Lavar has not done anymore complaining than any other pro bowler would do in his situation and I think he has a right to speak his mind. This seems like personal spat between him and Williams. Lavar has always been a team player, many people on this board will say otherwise but I ask them how long have they been fans of the Redskins? Have they not watched Lavar throughout his career here or what? He doesn't seem so by some of the comments made.


Nuskins, I have to respectfully disagree with you on this one. The perception that Lavar has "always" been a team player, IMO, is a product of the way the team was marketed during the lean years.

In his interviews since Gibbs arrived, it's evident that he realizes the spotlight is no longer on him, and he is no longer the center of attention. Sure, he comes out and does great things in the community, and he is awesome with the fans, but, the fans aren't the ones who decide if he plays or not.

Most recently, he keeps saying, "I wanna give my fans what they want", or stuff like that, and it just seems like he is so self-centered on being that "QB Killa" persona that was shoved down our throats for many years.

I'm not doubting his skills, nor his desire to "entertain" the home crowd, but he certainly needs to be proactive about mending the situation with his coaches, rather than waiting on them to come to him (as he hinted on his radio spot yesterday) to ask him to play. That's just childish.

He's a fan favorite, yes, but he needs to worry more about being in the good graces of those who control his playing time than in Joe the Fan who, like him, can only wonder out loud about what He's done to warrant his status on the depth chart.
Back and better than ever!
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

I'm keeping my mouth shut about the whole Lavar thing. After ranting and raving about Brunell coming in and now feeling like my foot is in my mouth, I am going to take their word for it. They know way more than me.
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

The Lavar issue will be resolved one of three ways:
Someone gets hurt and LA gets to start
The season ends and LA is traded.
The season ends and GW gets a head coaching job and the next Def. Coor. begs Gibbs not to trade LA.
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
gay4pacman
Pacman Rules
Pacman Rules
Posts: 1842
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:56 pm
Location: Lawn Monster

Post by gay4pacman »

Skinsfan55 wrote:Dammit!

LaVar needs to play more!

He is easily the most talented defensive player on the team, and he's being wasted! :(


Sean Taylor is more talented.
I know this guy named Jimmy, he has a pet....POSTERNUTBAG! Thats his cats name, POSTERNUTBAG!!!
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
nuskins wrote:Lavar has not done anymore complaining than any other pro bowler would do in his situation and I think he has a right to speak his mind. This seems like personal spat between him and Williams. Lavar has always been a team player, many people on this board will say otherwise but I ask them how long have they been fans of the Redskins? Have they not watched Lavar throughout his career here or what? He doesn't seem so by some of the comments made.


Nuskins, I have to respectfully disagree with you on this one. The perception that Lavar has "always" been a team player, IMO, is a product of the way the team was marketed during the lean years.

In his interviews since Gibbs arrived, it's evident that he realizes the spotlight is no longer on him, and he is no longer the center of attention. Sure, he comes out and does great things in the community, and he is awesome with the fans, but, the fans aren't the ones who decide if he plays or not.

Most recently, he keeps saying, "I wanna give my fans what they want", or stuff like that, and it just seems like he is so self-centered on being that "QB Killa" persona that was shoved down our throats for many years.

I'm not doubting his skills, nor his desire to "entertain" the home crowd, but he certainly needs to be proactive about mending the situation with his coaches, rather than waiting on them to come to him (as he hinted on his radio spot yesterday) to ask him to play. That's just childish.

He's a fan favorite, yes, but he needs to worry more about being in the good graces of those who control his playing time than in Joe the Fan who, like him, can only wonder out loud about what He's done to warrant his status on the depth chart.


Well considering when you go to FedEx on gameday, you see a few thousand Lavar Arrington jerseys, I can see that he itches to put 56 back on the field rather than blending in with the fans who are watching.

If the Redskins don't get production out of this guy, and we are paying him 12 million dollars total this year, that will be a blunder of mamoth proportions. We just settled his contract dispute. We can still cut, or trade him in the offseason if we want to, and we are only hurting our own trade value by not playing him.

Put the guy on the field or at least in more "packages" than he is already in. Holdman is nothing to write home about, the D-Line does not get pressure, and the defense has slipped from 3rd to 5th.

Im not worried, just tired of Washington being mired in some controversy with a good player. Do it the right way. Get your money's worth and then get him outta here. Don't waste him and then trade him, it doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
redskinz4ever
******
******
Posts: 2630
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 3:55 pm
Location: charlotte nc

Post by redskinz4ever »

lavar will not be a skin next year My 2 cents \:D/
TOUCHDOWN .....WASHINGTON REDSKINS !!!!
User avatar
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~
Posts: 8496
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Post by REDEEMEDSKIN »

The Hogster wrote:Well considering when you go to FedEx on gameday, you see a few thousand Lavar Arrington jerseys, I can see that he itches to put 56 back on the field rather than blending in with the fans who are watching.

If the Redskins don't get production out of this guy, and we are paying him 12 million dollars total this year, that will be a blunder of mamoth proportions. We just settled his contract dispute. We can still cut, or trade him in the offseason if we want to, and we are only hurting our own trade value by not playing him.

Put the guy on the field or at least in more "packages" than he is already in. Holdman is nothing to write home about, the D-Line does not get pressure, and the defense has slipped from 3rd to 5th.

Im not worried, just tired of Washington being mired in some controversy with a good player. Do it the right way. Get your money's worth and then get him outta here. Don't waste him and then trade him, it doesn't make a lot of sense to me.


Yeah, I hear ya. It's gotta be downright embarassing for #56 watch all those jerseys while riding pine. It goes to show you that he isn't the alpha dog he once was, before Joe arrived.

But, at the same time, I wanna take Joe at his word and believe that Lavar will contribute to this team in the future. Why should I doubt him??? Joe's given me no reason to believe otherwise, even if others will mention the handling of Ramsey as evidence to the contrary.

I hope #56 can work his way back into the starting lineup. That will only be evidence that he has bought into the system and is firing on all cylinders, within Williams' scheme, which will finally usher in the era of "Arrington" among the truly elite players at his position, in the NFL.
Back and better than ever!
Scooter
scooter
scooter
Posts: 1085
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 9:58 am
Location: NM
Contact:

Post by Scooter »

I think LaVar will be an even better player when he steps in line with the program. He's got plenty of talent and Holdman is doing more than keeping his spot warm - the dude can PLAY! I hope LaVar figures it out and gets himself on the field - until then, Williams is the man!
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

Williams is the man indeed, but Williams also says that Sean Taylor is his 'favorite player'. Okay, he's facing a mandatory minimum of 3 years this offseason..and he is still his favorite player.

Unless Lavar kicked in his office with a gun this year, I can't see how his behavior is much worse than the D-Coordinator's favorite player.

I like them both and want to see them both on the field. I was one of the people who thought the Moss for Coles trade was a good move, but getting rid of Lavar would not be wise given his contract situation. Besides, he does what we lack, rush the passer. At least sub him in for Reynaldo Wynn to generate a mismatch...this is plain silly.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

..After ranting and raving about Brunell coming in and now feeling like my foot is in my mouth, I am going to take their word for it. They know way more than me.


Why can't more people accept this?

We are 3-0. Our D is going to be very good again. The offense is getting better. The special teams are starting to get it together. :celebrate:


Patience people, Arrington will be a force on this D and we are going to be in the playoffs.





We are so lucky that Gibbs is our coach.

HTTR
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
csgunderson
newbie
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 5:39 pm

Post by csgunderson »

I'm not doubting his skills, nor his desire to "entertain" the home crowd, but he certainly needs to be proactive about mending the situation with his coaches, rather than waiting on them to come to him (as he hinted on his radio spot yesterday) to ask him to play. That's just childish.


I agree -- either LaVar is egocentric or not telling us everything (or both). If a player is unhappy with his position on the team, you go talk to the coaches to find out what it is you can do to show them that you deserve the opportunity to play more. You don't wait for the coaches to come to you. That's preposterous. LaVar needs to swallow what's left of his pride and ask Coach Gregg what exactly he can do to win back his starting job. Which begs the question - did LaVar already do this and just didn't like what Coach Gregg had to say?
csgunderson
newbie
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 5:39 pm

Post by csgunderson »

And as far as Coach Gregg making this a "power struggle." Please. That's just dumb. If he thought LaVar could help the defense play better than it is, LaVar would be playing. These coaches get paid to win.

My perception is twofold: (1) the coaches want LaVar to stay healthy (in practices) for several weeks to avoid a third injury to his knee in the past 12 months and (2) LaVar has a lot of learning time to make up because he missed most of last year, the entire off-season and most of the pre-season. I base #1 on the fact that LaVar is not playing on Teams. If he were completely healthy, he'd be on one of the Teams' units, as the other back-up LBs are. I base #2 on the fact that the players currently in front of LaVar on the depth chart have been working in this defense all year.

Give this story some time. If LaVar still isn't playing by week 8 or 9, then the writing may be on the wall.
KPrince1975
swine
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 5:49 pm

Post by KPrince1975 »

nuskins wrote:
BernieSki wrote:I personally think Greg Williams is a fool for not playing Levar. He is clearly a much better player and will have a greater impact on the game, then any of our current linebackers. There is a power play going on here and someone has to give for the best interest of the team.


After listening to Coach Gibbs address reporters yesterday it is rather clear that this is nothing more than a power play on the coaches part, more specifically Coach Williams part. Coach Gibbs really did not have a good answer to why Lavar is not playing other than saying that he is only in certain "schemes". In fact Gibbs looked uncomfortable talking about it and could do nothing more than say over and over that he is not playing b/c he is not in the "schemes". He also pointed out that it is soleley the Defenses Coach discretion what "schemes" they use, so it obviously points to Williams simply not including Lavar in the schemes. Personally it is mind blowing to me that Williams has decided not to play him.

Lavar has not done anymore complaining than any other pro bowler would do in his situation and I think he has a right to speak his mind. This seems like personal spat between him and Williams. Lavar has always been a team player, many people on this board will say otherwise but I ask them how long have they been fans of the Redskins? Have they not watched Lavar throughout his career here or what? It doesn't seem so by some of the comments made.

IMO opinion, and it's nothing more than that, I think Coach Williams is doing a disservice to the team by not playing one of the most disruptive LB in the game. Lavar is a Redskin through and through, always has been, long before Williams was. He has played his gutts out for this team through many losing seasons and coaching shuffles. He deserves to be in the game, he should be in the game, and it's a grave error that he is not b/c of a power trip by Williams. Our D is good, not great. The D does not get any turnovers and Gibbs is constantly talking about the turnover ratio. The best way the Redskins can get that ratio better in the short term is to put Lavar in. We all know that, including the coaches. Which makes the situation even worse.


Thank you! It is really starting to iritate me that Lavar has to put up with this crap!
User avatar
hkHog
Hog
Posts: 1912
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:06 pm

Post by hkHog »

People are reading too much into this. People wondered why Williams didn't start ST last year, and then why Rogers didn't start this year until Harris got injured. It's just the way he works. Again in these cases everyone was asking what those guys did wrong to get in his doghouse. Didn't we hear the EXACT same quotes about those guys - "they weren't in the packages we used"?

This has just been so sensationalized and blown out of proportion. Everyone is just assuming he doesn't like Lavar or he's trying to assert his power. Based on what evidence?

As I said before, just the fact that Lavar is healthy doesn't mean he's in game shape. He was only able to start practicing more than halfway through camp. Also, you can sit and study schemes but having actual experience practicing and executing these takes time. Holdman was doing this long before Arrington even got clearence to do agility training let alone full contact drills.

Bottom line, Williams isn't an idiot! Either Lavar is not the same since his injury and is no longer the player he once was (possible but unlikely), he is a liability because he doesn't understand or doesn't want to work in the schemes (again possible but I think unlikely), or he just isn't quite ready yet (I think this is the case). This isn't the big conspiracy people make it out to be. Mark my words, by midseason he will be the starter again.
"We're not going to be the pushovers of the NFL, we're gonna push over some people!" - Clinton Portis
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Post by riggofan »

Lots of smart people in this thread saying the same thing: Gotta trust the coaches on the lavar thing.

Its fun to speculate though!

We'll probably find out the truth in some L-Coles type fashion next March. Probably Danny Boy got Lavar on the phone and said "You'll never reach those incentives and you'll never see another pro bowl! I'll pay millions just to bury you on my bench PUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNK!!!!"

:)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You can't do epic **** with basic people." - DJax
"We're on the rise, man, whether you're on the train or not." - Josh Norman
Post Reply