We are going to be fine this year.

[EasyMoney]

I hate to be so optimistic, but on the basis of this one game, I have to agree that we look pretty good. The scores against us seem of no significance...all against reserves...and our offenses seems to be improving.

when did carlos rogers become a reserve? he was toasted on consecutive deep balls by cincy's #2 and 3 receivers.

i am telling you, as a non-blind homer i watched that game and saw very little from the redskins to make me think they will be any good this year. the d looked good because they blitzed every play and the bengals didn't have a game plan in, they were just trying to get some guys a look (what preseason is for!). once the bengals adjusted to the aggressive d they moved the ball much more effectively.

ramsey looks terrible - he very well may be the worst starter in the league. brunnel looks pretty good but why is he in the 4th quarter? these are the only reps campbell will see all year and gibbs is giving them to brunnel? why - b/c ramsey's days as starter are numbered.

When did Carlos become a starter? Where are you getting your information? As far as I know he's the #3. Why would GW start a player who is obviously out of football shape? After missing ALL of camp? I'm pretty sure he WILL be a starter at some point this season but not right now.

The D looked good in the first quarter because the majority of starters were in... Not because they blitzed every play and regardless, if it works... it works right? The pick... caused by Daniels. Somehow I thought that D Ends go after the QB 90% of the time. Was it a blitz? Possibly, I can't remember off hand but the play worked. Rudy Johnson running for -12 yards was a great thing to see. That wasn't a blitz, that was just a smothering D. I think they only played in three series' and came out. Neither team seriously game planned. Vanilla from every team on both sides of the ball. That's what preseason is all about. The D looks fine.

Whatever happens with the QB's... happens. I can't say that I've been impressed with Ramsey so far. Both of those picks in the last game were REALLY bad. The endzone play Betts was WIDE open in the flat. The 2nd pick Moss had 8 yards of separation in front and behind him. That is WIDE OPEN. You have to be able to make those throws. I think Gibbs not playing Campbell in the last game shows his irritation with Ramsey. If I was Gibbs I would've pulled Patrick as soon as he threw the TD to Thrash. Left on a good note and let the rest of the guys play. But I'm not Gibbs. We've seen Patrick play for almost a half in two straight games. It's not unheard of but I think the term "unquestionable starter" should be thrown out the window. Worst starter in the league is also a stretch. I can think of at least 3 or 4 starting QB's that I wouldn't choose over Ramsey.

[Chris Luva Luva]

how different might the game have been if santana moss had caught sight of that pass in the 1st series? ramsey lofted a beautiful touch pass perfectly in front where only moss could get it. moss had good seperation from his defender and would've taken it all the way into the endzone. that's just a matter of chemistry, familiarity. hopefully that will come in time.

If I remeber correctly, Santana wasn't even looking for the pass.

I hate to be so optimistic, but on the basis of this one game, I have to agree that we look pretty good. The scores against us seem of no significance...all against reserves...and our offenses seems to be improving.

Im going to add this to my signature.

when did carlos rogers become a reserve? he was toasted on consecutive deep balls by cincy's #2 and 3 receivers.

Non blind homer? Ok man, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt here and offer up a rebuttle. Did you not know that Carlos has been sitting on his butt with an injury during the entire camp? Since he wasn't working out that meant he was out of shape. The kid covered Chad eariler in the game just swell. He caught an INT and run it back for 20 or so yards and by that time he was tired. He ONLY got burnt because he was tired and winded.

i am telling you, as a non-blind homer i watched that game and saw very little from the redskins to make me think they will be any good this year. the d looked good because they blitzed every play and the bengals didn't have a game plan in

Oh yea, the Bengals werent trying to accomplish anything out there. They were just pitchin the ball around while our defense was playing like its the super bowl. :ROLL: Our #3 NFL defense has gone down the chutes even though we've got better players on it this year.


No offence but you may not be a blind homer, but you seem to be a misinformed doubter.


, they were just trying to get some guys a look (what preseason is for!). once the bengals adjusted to the aggressive d they moved the ball much more effectively.

ramsey looks terrible - he very well may be the worst starter in the league. brunnel looks pretty good but why is he in the 4th quarter? these are the only reps campbell will see all year and gibbs is giving them to brunnel? why - b/c ramsey's days as starter are numbered.[/quote]

[Billy Bullocks]

Who's your possession WR? Who moves the chains

[1niksder]

Who's your possession WR? Who moves the chains

7 post .... all mindless - don't expect a lot of conversation

[1fan4ramsey]

Who's your possession WR? Who moves the chains

Good luck with Bledsoe, genious...he stands back there like a statue, the Redskins defense will eat him alive

[welch]

BB asks

Who's your possession WR? Who moves the chains

Santana Moss. He moves them about 30 yards at a time.

And Mr. Patten. Another 25 or 30.

Simple and clear enough?

[crazyhorse1]

y, Nemo, Rock

[Deadskins]

That is about as grim a picture as could be made. I am suprised that you still want to be a supporter. Maybe you are here to just be anti anything possibly good about the rebuilding effort that Gibbs is trying here?

Fee-Fi-Fo_Block is no Skins fan, SJ. He is a troll.

[ArizonaHOG]

Who's your possession WR? Who moves the chains

The O-line....we like to call them the HOGS. They move then chains.

[1niksder]

That is about as grim a picture as could be made. I am suprised that you still want to be a supporter. Maybe you are here to just be anti anything possibly good about the rebuilding effort that Gibbs is trying here?

Fee-Fi-Fo_Block is no Skins fan, SJ. He is a troll.

After the performance of the Steelers on Friday, we won't see him for awhile

[SKINZ_DOMIN8]

That is about as grim a picture as could be made. I am suprised that you still want to be a supporter. Maybe you are here to just be anti anything possibly good about the rebuilding effort that Gibbs is trying here?

Fee-Fi-Fo_Block is no Skins fan, SJ. He is a troll.

After the performance of the Steelers on Friday, we won't see him for awhile

Performance?

Are you insinuating that the Redskins totally dominated? Cause if you did I would like to know what game you were watching.

I was there. It was a good performance but not one that would have beaten 80% of the other teams in the league.

Its funny how people on this site and on others love to look past Ramsey's mistakes but didn't give Brunell the same slack.

That interception that Ramsey threw was very troubling but that doesn't exist here.... only happy feelings.

[Jake]

That is about as grim a picture as could be made. I am suprised that you still want to be a supporter. Maybe you are here to just be anti anything possibly good about the rebuilding effort that Gibbs is trying here?

Fee-Fi-Fo_Block is no Skins fan, SJ. He is a troll.

After the performance of the Steelers on Friday, we won't see him for awhile

Performance?

Are you insinuating that the Redskins totally dominated?

Ummm... your username is.

[SKINZ_DOMIN8]

That is about as grim a picture as could be made. I am suprised that you still want to be a supporter. Maybe you are here to just be anti anything possibly good about the rebuilding effort that Gibbs is trying here?

Fee-Fi-Fo_Block is no Skins fan, SJ. He is a troll.

After the performance of the Steelers on Friday, we won't see him for awhile

Performance?

Are you insinuating that the Redskins totally dominated?

Ummm... your username is.

Dude.......seriously....what is your point?

Can't you stick to the point of the thread for once?

I was at the game and saw that horrific interception. Ramsey threw right at him. There is no excuse whatsoever for it no matter how many of the Ramsey-junta in here try to spin it.

The running game is going to be good only if Portis stays healthy. But the running game alone won't get us to 9 wins. And if there is anyone that truly believes Ramsey is the future of this franchise then they are not thinking with logic.

And by the way how or in what realm of reality is 12/19 good numbers?

Would someone dare to explain that to me?

[1fan4ramsey]

That is about as grim a picture as could be made. I am suprised that you still want to be a supporter. Maybe you are here to just be anti anything possibly good about the rebuilding effort that Gibbs is trying here?

Fee-Fi-Fo_Block is no Skins fan, SJ. He is a troll.

After the performance of the Steelers on Friday, we won't see him for awhile

Performance?

Are you insinuating that the Redskins totally dominated?

Ummm... your username is.

Dude.......seriously....what is your point?

Can't you stick to the point of the thread for once?

I was at the game and saw that horrific interception. Ramsey threw right at him. There is no excuse whatsoever for it no matter how many of the Ramsey-junta in here try to spin it.

The running game is going to be good only if Portis stays healthy. But the running game alone won't get us to 9 wins. And if there is anyone that truly believes Ramsey is the future of this franchise then they are not thinking with logic.

And by the way how or in what realm of reality is 12/19 good numbers?

Would someone dare to explain that to me?

wasn't it Thrash's fault as much as Ramsey's? Did'nt Mcnabb throw a similar pick the week before? Are eagles fans calling for his benching?

[hkHog]

Yeah, McNabb did EXACTLY the same thing.

[NikiH]

The running game is going to be good only if Portis stays healthy. But the running game alone won't get us to 9 wins.

I got this one Jake, please allow me!

You were at the game? Did you fall asleep after the first few drives?? Our running game continued to thrive through out the game and did you notice where Portis was?? He was on the bench! Our O-line is providing holes for the RB's to get through. That is where a running game is developed and that is exactly what you saw happen in Friday's game.

And if there is anyone that truly believes Ramsey is the future of this franchise then they are not thinking with logic.

And by the way how or in what realm of reality is 12/19 good numbers?

Would someone dare to explain that to me?

Ok it was a win. Your post at this point just became idiotic. First it's that we're all lost because they cannot pull it together and win and now they win and you want perfection? NO ONE is perfect. We want wins. If we win, we are doing enough of the right things. If it's not acceptable for you, perhaps your vast knowledge of sports would better be suited to something like bowling? Please do us all a favor and move on. Football is not about perfection. Interceptions happen, even to the all powerful Mannings of the NFL. If you cannot see great improvement from last weeks game do not call yourself a fan of the game of football.

[SKINZ_DOMIN8]

The running game is going to be good only if Portis stays healthy. But the running game alone won't get us to 9 wins.

I got this one Jake, please allow me!

You were at the game? Did you fall asleep after the first few drives?? Our running game continued to thrive through out the game and did you notice where Portis was?? He was on the bench! Our O-line is providing holes for the RB's to get through. That is where a running game is developed and that is exactly what you saw happen in Friday's game.

And if there is anyone that truly believes Ramsey is the future of this franchise then they are not thinking with logic.

And by the way how or in what realm of reality is 12/19 good numbers?

Would someone dare to explain that to me?

Ok it was a win. Your post at this point just became idiotic. First it's that we're all lost because they cannot pull it together and win and now they win and you want perfection? NO ONE is perfect. We want wins. If we win, we are doing enough of the right things. If it's not acceptable for you, perhaps your vast knowledge of sports would better be suited to something like bowling? Please do us all a favor and move on. Football is not about perfection. Interceptions happen, even to the all powerful Mannings of the NFL. If you cannot see great improvement from last weeks game do not call yourself a fan of the game of football.

Did you even read my post???? I don't think so.

Put down the homer glasses and re-read my post.

I stressed that the running game was decent but won't get us to nine wins alone.

Football is not about perfection? Tell that to the Patriots.

Interceptions just happen? Yeah, they only happen to Brunell but not to Ramsey

I don't think you nor any of the Ramsey-junta want wins to be honest. I think you just want to accept the losing mentality so long as your hero drags down my team with him.

[fredp45]

The thing that isn't getting mentioned here? The Steelers are a solid team...a very good defensive team. Like us, one of the top 3 last year. We moved the ball on them all game -- 170 yards rushing and 200 yards passing...I was happy. Should we not give credit to our offense because the Steelers didn't have any of their starting running backs and couldn't sustain drives?

Granted, Ramsey should NOT have thrown that INT but I think he's pressing, trying to keep the job. Normally, you throw it away or eat it for a loss and get it back next time. I worry about his decision making at times...he's like a young QB trying to do something positive on every play -- oh wait, he is a young QB! Seriously, if the defense, blitzes 7 and our Line can't hold them, eat it or throw it away...a completion shouldn't be his concern. He needs to remember, punting is not a bad thing...you gain lots of field position with punting.

But I didn't see it in person...maybe you saw something we didn't.

[NikiH]

First of all it is not acceptable to call anyone names. So you may want to edit that last post before you're warned for not following the rules, with in the forum.

And Tom Brady (your NE Patriot perfection) threw 14 interceptions last year. OH GASP! Not the Patriots! The Patriots while remarkable, are not perfect.

You stressed that ONLY if Clinton Portis stays healthy will our running game be decent. Portis had very little to do with the grand success of the Steelers games. And that was my point. Interceptions happen to EVERY quarterback in the league. Ramsey showed a HUGE amount of progress during this game and why can you just not give the man that. And you're right I could care less if we win. Don't pretend you have a clue about me or what kind of fan I am. You could never fathom my allegiance to this team.

[SKINZ_DOMIN8]

First of all it is not acceptable to call anyone names. So you may want to edit that last post before you're warned for not following the rules, with in the forum.

And Tom Brady (your NE Patriot perfection) threw 14 interceptions last year. OH GASP! Not the Patriots! The Patriots while remarkable, are not perfect.

You stressed that ONLY if Clinton Portis stays healthy will our running game be decent. Portis had very little to do with the grand success of the Steelers games. And that was my point. Interceptions happen to EVERY quarterback in the league. Ramsey showed a HUGE amount of progress during this game and why can you just not give the man that. And you're right I could care less if we win. Don't pretend you have a clue about me or what kind of fan I am. You could never fathom my allegiance to this team.

What??????????

After laughing ten straight minutes at your latest masterpiece, ^, I must say I am worried about the true Redskin fanbase. Portis had very little to do with the Steeler game? I suppose that was Mickey Mouse running through the Steelers' D.

Of all the people that should be thanking their lucky stars that we have Portis it is the Ramsey-fanatics. Without Portis, Ramsey doesn't have an ice chips' shot in hades.

The Patriots are not perfect?? 3 championships in 4 years isn't perfect for you?? I wonder what your definition of "perfect" is.

Brady makes the best decisions on the best team. It's just that simple.

[1fan4ramsey]

First of all it is not acceptable to call anyone names. So you may want to edit that last post before you're warned for not following the rules, with in the forum.

And Tom Brady (your NE Patriot perfection) threw 14 interceptions last year. OH GASP! Not the Patriots! The Patriots while remarkable, are not perfect.

You stressed that ONLY if Clinton Portis stays healthy will our running game be decent. Portis had very little to do with the grand success of the Steelers games. And that was my point. Interceptions happen to EVERY quarterback in the league. Ramsey showed a HUGE amount of progress during this game and why can you just not give the man that. And you're right I could care less if we win. Don't pretend you have a clue about me or what kind of fan I am. You could never fathom my allegiance to this team.

What??????????

After laughing ten straight minutes at your latest masterpiece, ^, I must say I am worried about the true Redskin fanbase. Portis had very little to do with the Steeler game? I suppose that was Mickey Mouse running through the Steelers' D.

Of all the people that should be thanking their lucky stars that we have Portis it is the Ramsey-fanatics. Without Portis, Ramsey doesn't have an ice chips' shot in hades.

The Patriots are not perfect?? 3 championships in 4 years isn't perfect for you?? I wonder what your definition of "perfect" is.

Brady makes the best decisions on the best team. It's just that simple.

Why don't you become a Pats fan

[crazyhorse1]

That is about as grim a picture as could be made. I am suprised that you still want to be a supporter. Maybe you are here to just be anti anything possibly good about the rebuilding effort that Gibbs is trying here?

Fee-Fi-Fo_Block is no Skins fan, SJ. He is a troll.

After the performance of the Steelers on Friday, we won't see him for awhile

Performance?

Are you insinuating that the Redskins totally dominated? Cause if you did I would like to know what game you were watching.

I was there. It was a good performance but not one that would have beaten 80% of the other teams in the league.

Its funny how people on this site and on others love to look past Ramsey's mistakes but didn't give Brunell the same slack.

That interception that Ramsey threw was very troubling but that doesn't exist here.... only happy feelings.

Actually, yes. We totally dominated. In fact, we ran up and down the field on the Steelers, last year's no. 1 defensive unit. Our four backs averaged over forty yards a piece against the steel curtain. Our forth string RB ran for 46 yards in a quarter. We also passed pretty much at will, our quarterbacks hitting about two thirds of their passes. Time of possession, forget about it. Did the Steeler get the ball?
Oh, Steelers got a fluke TD on a busted Redskin play. Congrats, and a FG on a run that pretty much accounted for the Steeler offense. Congrats again.

As for out performance not beating 80% of the league's other teams.

[SkinsJock]

There are some who post here whose posts are basically trying to antagonise everyone and the content alone defies even logical progression.

We are a lot better than we were this time last year and there is no team looking a whole lot better at this time. The season is only 2 weeks away and we should just hope taht everyone can be available to play on opening day.

Kyle Orton will be ready and we will quickly see how we are going to be measured by those that know and not by those who, as Niki says, should take up "bowling"!

[Scottskins]

First of all it is not acceptable to call anyone names. So you may want to edit that last post before you're warned for not following the rules, with in the forum.

And Tom Brady (your NE Patriot perfection) threw 14 interceptions last year. OH GASP! Not the Patriots! The Patriots while remarkable, are not perfect.

You stressed that ONLY if Clinton Portis stays healthy will our running game be decent. Portis had very little to do with the grand success of the Steelers games. And that was my point. Interceptions happen to EVERY quarterback in the league. Ramsey showed a HUGE amount of progress during this game and why can you just not give the man that. And you're right I could care less if we win. Don't pretend you have a clue about me or what kind of fan I am. You could never fathom my allegiance to this team.

What??????????

After laughing ten straight minutes at your latest masterpiece, ^, I must say I am worried about the true Redskin fanbase. Portis had very little to do with the Steeler game? I suppose that was Mickey Mouse running through the Steelers' D.

Of all the people that should be thanking their lucky stars that we have Portis it is the Ramsey-fanatics. Without Portis, Ramsey doesn't have an ice chips' shot in hades.

The Patriots are not perfect?? 3 championships in 4 years isn't perfect for you?? I wonder what your definition of "perfect" is.

Brady makes the best decisions on the best team. It's just that simple.

your laughing? most all of US are the ones that laugh. We laugh at just about everything you post. I mean, how many brain cells does it take?

Niki was NOT saying we don't need or want Portis. She was stating the fact that he had little to do with the win over the Steelers and that we can run the ball well with Betts. Portis ran the ball 8 times for 48 yards. He was in the game for 2 series. THAT'S IT!!! When he left the game we had 3 points. After that, Betts ran 9 times 41 yards. And then Nemo and Rock ran 20 times for another 70 yards. How on earth does what she said, make you laugh? The facts make you laugh? Your a strange person indeed.

Her statement about Brady not being perfect was to show you that a QB throwing Ints does not mean they can't win. He's a very good QB, but he is not perfect as she proved to you. But more to your point, the Patriots did lose some gamers during those years and they didn't win 4 in a row, so NO they are not perfect. Perfection is no mistakes. Figured a guy as smart as you seem to think you are would know what perfection was. Bernie Kosar made the best decisions of any QB his whole career. How many superbowls did he win again?

12/19 isn't good? 63% completion % is not good? 63% is not good when half your throws go for 20+ yards because your trying to build timing and confidence in PRESEASON? please explain to me how 63% in NOT GOOD?????

Ramsey made 1 bad decision and about 3 bad throws in ONE HALF of a football game. Quit hating on the kid. What you believe will have no effect on the success of this football team. If you don't like what we have to say to each other around here about the team we love, then go away. Go join Extremeskins.

Quit being a damn troll. If you a cowboys fan in disguise, just come on out and say it. Why are you so scared of the Redskins succeeding? The FACTS are that our OLine looked great against the #1 run defense of last season. Our new WRs looked fast and open most of the night. Our RBs all looked good and Patrick showed great improvement in both mobility and confidence while seemingly taking a small step back on touch and power. Our defense showed Pittsburgh who the better defense is. Carlos Rogers looked like the next coming of Sean Taylor. Arrington looked pretty good in his limited action. Everything is coming along nicely. This is a team we can win 15 games with. Just like Pittsburgh did last season. We probably won't but it is possible.

Even Manfreda and Crazy are starting to realize that this team is turning into a Joe Gibbs club.

If you really are a Redskins fan, which I find highly doubtful, then you need to quit trying to start fights here. Most of us here see the good things that are happening to the Redskins. We KNOW they are not perfect yet. They probably never will be. If you want perfection so bad, maybe you SHOULD switch to the Patriots since you seem to worship them. Although I think their run is just about over...

[1niksder]

That is about as grim a picture as could be made. I am suprised that you still want to be a supporter. Maybe you are here to just be anti anything possibly good about the rebuilding effort that Gibbs is trying here?

Fee-Fi-Fo_Block is no Skins fan, SJ. He is a troll.

After the performance of the Steelers on Friday, we won't see him for awhile

Performance?

Are you insinuating that the Redskins totally dominated? Cause if you did I would like to know what game you were watching. .

I wasn’t insinuating that the Redskins did anything. I was pointing out that Fo_Block is a Steelers fan that came here boasting about how bad they would beat the Skins.

Fact of the matter is I could have insinuated the Skins dominated Friday night, and unlike you point to more than one play early in the game to make my point. Because you don’t know what Redskin game I could have been watching tells be not to waste space pointing out things you will refuse to except anyway.

I was there. It was a good performance but not one that would have beaten 80% of the other teams in the league.

We play 13 teams a year 3 of them twice, so we only need to beat 40%. When the final whistle blows the team with the most points win.

Its funny how people on this site and on others love to look past Ramsey's mistakes but didn't give Brunell the same slack.

That interception that Ramsey threw was very troubling but that doesn't exist here.... only happy feelings.

You obviously stopped watching last season after week 3, and you’ve hated Ramsey ever sense. Brunell struggled for 9 weeks **If that being given slack – you tell me what is**.
Ramsey has been named the starter for the season as Redskin fans we should support our starting QB.

If he had stunk up Fed-Ex Friday I’d understand some of your comments (which I’ll get to), but he shook off the int and put 10 points on the board before he took his leave.

You single out one play, a play where the Steelers blitzed and no-one picked it up - the receiver and QB did not communicate properly, and a interception was returned for a TD. That’s a weak argument when you consider the so-called Ramsey supporters are posting all over this board about the under thrown passes, miss reads and the continuing poor judgement.

The so-called Ramsey lovers are Redskin fans and want the best man in there. Unlike you we watched the whole season and saw constant improvement in Ramsey as the season went on, he seems to be continuing that trend. You just refuse to see it. Many here have tried pointing you in the right direction but your either blind or biased.

Dude.......seriously....what is your point?

Can't you stick to the point of the thread for once?

How ‘bout everybody got his point… EVERYBODY BUT YOU!
But that’s nothing new … is it? BTW he was on topic.

I was at the game and saw that horrific interception. Ramsey threw right at him. There is no excuse whatsoever for it no matter how many of the Ramsey-junta in here try to spin it.

Ain’t no spin to it, but if that’s all you got out of the game then you wasted your money. This isn’t a time to make excuses for mistakes this is the time to point out mistakes and fix them. Again you are off base (I don’t know why I type again, considering this is just a rehash of the B.S. that all ways follows your username.

The running game is going to be good only if Portis stays healthy. But the running game alone won't get us to 9 wins. And if there is anyone that truly believes Ramsey is the future of this franchise then they are not thinking with logic.

The running game will be good and that will help the passing game. Seems we’ve been down this road before also. If you took the time to read what others post you’d know that most of the so-called Ramsey-junta thinks and hopes that Jason is the future

And by the way how or in what realm of reality is 12/19 good numbers?

Would someone dare to explain that to me?

Ramsey completed 63% of his passes for 141 yards and Ben went 50% for 58 yards. Ramsey actually threw two touchdowns but 1 was for them so we won’t mention that.
Oops my bad if we don’t mention the Int. you don’t have anything to say do you?

Did you even read my post???? I don't think so.

NikiH said your post became idiotic a few post prior to this one. If NikiH was wrong then I’m here to tell you – you reached that level here just by summing up your points.

How could she not read your post, she is quoting it piece by piece as she responds. For you to think she hasn’t read what she is replying to than you aren’t thinking. That brings me to my own question….

How did I generate this response …

Are you insinuating that the Redskins totally dominated? Cause if you did I would like to know what game you were watching.

From this post…

[quote=”1niksder”]After the performance of the Steelers on Friday, we won't see him for awhile[/quote]

This was about the performance of the Steelers nothing mentioned about the Skins. So I ask DID YOU EVEN READ MY POST … It was one line????

What??????????

After laughing ten straight minutes at your latest masterpiece, ^, I must say I am worried about the true Redskin fanbase. Portis had very little to do with the Steeler game? I suppose that was Mickey Mouse running through the Steelers' D.

Like I said you’re a waste of time. But since I’m wasting time right now I’ll point out what you missed while you were at the game. The Redskins ran for 166 yards on 39 attempts (no including QBs). I’m here in Florida and can state with all certainty that Mickey Mouse did not carry the ball 31 times for 118 yards, and I’m pretty sure CP left after a 8 for 48 yard night.

Of all the people that should be thanking their lucky stars that we have Portis it is the Ramsey-fanatics. Without Portis, Ramsey doesn't have an ice chips' shot in hades.

That could be said for every QB in the NFL, so as you would say… What’s your point?
We’ve been trying to point out to you that the running game would open up the passing game since you’ve been here. Glad you understand that. Now we can start on how a improved offensive line will help the running game. (you might want to pick up on this quick – that way you can split all credit between the O-line and CP- you’ll never have to eat these words)

The Patriots are not perfect?? 3 championships in 4 years isn't perfect for you?? I wonder what your definition of "perfect" is.

Brady makes the best decisions on the best team. It's just that simple.

3 in four years would be 75% ...Perfect would be 100% …get it?