Who is the new #2 Receiver?

Skins2theBowl · Post by **Skins2theBowl** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:03 pm

Now that Rod "50/50" Gardner is gone who will be our #2 receiver? Im going to give the early nod to Kevin Dyson.

andyjens89 · Post by **andyjens89** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:05 pm

patten or jacobs

skinsfan#33 · Post by **skinsfan#33** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:11 pm

Patten or Mosss, because we have no #1 WR. We certainly are deap at the #3 spot!

Jeremy81 · Post by **Jeremy81** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:15 pm

he won't be the number two receiver just yet or even for a while, but i think damien harrell is going to surprise a lot of people in camp...i live in denver and he's had a lot of hype here the last few years so i started watching him...he runs a 4.2 and he's tall. people said the only reason he didn't go to the nfl was cause his hands were suspect, but he's proved himself in arena league. i'm glad we got him

HailSkins94 · Post by **HailSkins94** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:21 pm

Doesn't matter who is the #1 or #2 in this offense, everyone will have a chance to produce. If I had my say, Moss, Patten, Jacobs, Mccants, Thrash, Dyson. Cool

ey will even be lined up in the slot and that also goes for Portis. Plenty of options.

Punu · Post by **Punu** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:24 pm

Doesn't matter who is the #1 or #2 in this offense, everyone will have a chance to produce. If I had my say, Moss, Patten, Jacobs, Mccants, Thrash, Dyson.

Exactly...
but whatever happened to old man freeman?

SkinFan 0-16 or 16-0 · Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:40 pm

Jeremy81 wrote:he won't be the number two receiver just yet or even for a while, but i think damien harrell is going to surprise a lot of people in camp...i live in denver and he's had a lot of hype here the last few years so i started watching him...he runs a 4.2 and he's tall. people said the only reason he didn't go to the nfl was cause his hands were suspect, but he's proved himself in arena league. i'm glad we got him

He's not on the team. They've said he won't be offere a contract.

Jake · Post by **Jake** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:48 pm

I think Moss will be the #1 and Patten will be #2. My heart tells me that McCants will be #3 and Jacobs will be #4 and Thrash #5. I can't see Dyson beating them out.

sch1977 · Post by **sch1977** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:51 pm

Moss #1

Patten #2

Jacobs #3

Dyson #4

Skinsfan55 · Post by **Skinsfan55** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 4:34 pm

1- Moss
2- Jacobs
3- Harrell
4- McCants

Harrell is going to be a HUGE surprise.

DCGloryYears828791 · Post by **DCGloryYears828791** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:54 pm

Skinsfan55 wrote:1- Moss
2- Jacobs
3- Harrell
4- McCants

Harrell is going to be a HUGE surprise.

You can't catch balls if your not on the roster.

1/2 - Moss/Patten (just like our cornerbacks last year, no clear cut 1)

3/4- McCants/Thrash/Dyson (reciever by committee)

And we all know Thrash will be active for every game because he is MR. SPECIAL TEAMS!!

How many days till the Death of DALLAS ON MONDAY NIGHT! This season can't come soon enough!

Redskin in Canada · Post by **Redskin in Canada** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:56 pm

1- Moss
2- Patten
3- Jacobs/McCants/Thrash

Moss and Patten are the starters and Jacobs, McCants and Thrash share the third position.

skinsfan#33 · Post by **skinsfan#33** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:08 pm

Skinsfan55 wrote:1- Moss
2- Jacobs
3- Harrell
4- McCants

Harrell is going to be a HUGE surprise.

#55 who the heck is Harrell?

FanofallthatisGibbs · Post by **FanofallthatisGibbs** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 8:57 pm

I would rather not have a big #1 guy. If everyone is a target and a good receiver, then their #1 corner won't be sucha bog influence and our Offense will always have options, plus Cool

ey and Portis as alluded to earlier in this thread.

Then again, I wouldn't mind the Lions big 3...

Scottskins · Post by **Scottskins** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 9:06 pm

Patten and Moss 1 and 2 with Jacobs inserting himself into the starting lineup by week 8. Not sure who he'll replace, but I suspect it will be Moss. Joe may not want to hurt any feelings though, so he may opt to rotate Patten, Moss and Jacobs evenly...

I do think we will be playing a lot of receivers much like Williams does with defensive lineman and linebackers.

It may come down to Moss, Patten, and Jacobs all being on the field for 50% of the plays. Who knows for sure, but I expect to see a huge year from Jacobs regardless.

If Moss gets hurt, he will definitely lose his starting job though.

redskincity · Post by **redskincity** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 9:52 pm

I think McCants will surprise alot this year.
He has the skills to be a #2 receiver but would be dangerous in the slot.

If Patten and Moss are getting pushed around to much in preseason, look for McCants to get his big chance.

hatsOFF2gibbs · Post by **hatsOFF2gibbs** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:55 pm

1-Moss
2-Patten
3-Jacobs
4-McCants
5-Dyson
6-Don't really care

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:05 pm

Is it true that we didn't get the AFC guy? I was hoping for him to be a hidden gem.

#1. Moss
#2. Patten
#3. Harrell/McCants
#4. Jacobs (could play slot in certain situations

SkinFan 0-16 or 16-0 · Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:33 pm

He was not offered a contract. He won't be on the team

Smithian · Post by **Smithian** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:45 pm

1. Moss
2. Patten
3. Jacobs
4. Thrash/McCants

So, Harrell won't be around?

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:03 am

SkinFan 0-16 or 16-0 wrote:He was not offered a contract. He won't be on the team

Can you or someone post a link to this? Was he not impressive or out of shape? What was the hold up?

SkinFan 0-16 or 16-0 · Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:43 am

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 02001.html

End of the Article

I was kind of surprised by this. I saw him in the Arena Leagues (Don't ask why I watched, the NFL can't get started quick enough) and he was a beast there. But then again tha's like a 50 yard field.

Oh well. At least we won't have to wonder what if we signed him?

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:46 am

SkinFan 0-16 or 16-0 wrote:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/27/AR2005072702001.html

End of the Article

I was kind of surprised by this. I saw him in the Arena Leagues (Don't ask why I watched, the NFL can't get started quick enough) and he was a beast there. But then again tha's like a 50 yard field.

Oh well. At least we won't have to wonder what if we signed him?

Thank you very much. I read that article and stopped at the Mike Barrow stuff, I thought it was old news. Man, I wonder how bad this guy was. Maybe it was a money situaion...but that never stopped us before. :lol:

Well.....hmmm, I guess...I really have nothing else to type. :lol:

Gibbs4Life · Post by **Gibbs4Life** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 4:10 am

I'm optimistic about Moss Patten Jacobs with appearances by McCants and Dyson. But if WR is a problem this year, the sting of not TAKING MIKE WILLIAMS with no.5 could be too much. Santana and Patrick need to become like Harrisson and Manning. They should be working extra after practice perfecting timing.

Skin by Grace · Post by **Skin by Grace** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 5:04 am

Gibbs4Life wrote:I'm optimistic about Moss Patten Jacobs with appearances by McCants and Dyson. But if WR is a problem this year, the sting of not TAKING MIKE WILLIAMS with no.5 could be too much. Santana and Patrick need to become like Harrisson and Manning. They should be working extra after practice perfecting timing.

we can only hope