GIANTS: TIM OUR NO. 2 QB

Talk about the AFC, NFC, the NFL Draft, College Football... anything football that has no Washington Football Team relevance.
Post Reply
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

GIANTS: TIM OUR NO. 2 QB

Post by 1niksder »

GIANTS: TIM OUR NO. 2 QB

By PAUL SCHWARTZ
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Image


May 17, 2005 -- There is no experimentation going on with the Giants and their quarterback situation. The search is over. The team is entirely comfortable going into training camp — and heading into the season — with Tim Hasselbeck as the backup to Eli Manning.
Getting awarded Hasselbeck off waivers from the Redskins was no minor move in the minds of the Giants, as they coveted him, hoped he'd get cut and then sweated out the waiver process until they received word last Monday that they got their man.

"Hasselbeck was a gift," GM Ernie Accorsi yesterday told The Post. "We did not expect him to become available. We have a high regard for him. If he were a free agent he would have been at the top of our list. This is not one of these stop-gap things."

The Giants believe they have their three quarterbacks in place, with Jesse Palmer expected to beat out Jared Lorenzen for the No. 3 job, a role Palmer filled last season while not throwing a single pass.

At first, when the Giants picked up Hasselbeck, 27, it seemed as if he and Palmer, 26, would compete for the backup job. That battle likely will not emerge, as Hasselbeck is clearly in the lead for the No. 2 spot.

Accorsi went as far as to say that, other than Kerry Collins, Hasselbeck "talent-wise is as good a backup as we've had here," although Accorsi did give Kurt Warner an edge over Hasselbeck in experience.

Is there basis for the high value the Giants place on Hasselbeck? After all, he went undrafted in 2001 out of Boston College, and his five career starts all came in 2003, when he replaced an injured Patrick Ramsey.



Hasselbeck compiled a rating of 63.6 and did beat the Giants 20-7. He was deemed expendable by the Redskins this offseason after they selected Jason Campbell in the draft. When he was cut, Hasselbeck first had to pass through waivers, which goes by the order of the first round of the NFL draft.

That means 11 teams passed on Hasselbeck before the Giants — who originally owned the No. 12 pick before trading it to the Chargers — claimed and were awarded him.

Going with Hasselbeck and Palmer also negates the role of a Manning mentor, something the Giants once said was so important when they signed Jim Miller — and, after Miller went down with a torn hip labrum, when they tried to sign Doug Flutie. There will be little in the way of veteran guidance for Manning.

"The last thing we're going to worry about with Eli Manning with his family background is that he needs a mentor," Accorsi said.


http://www.nypost.com/sports/giants/44224.htm
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
statboy
swine
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:09 pm
Location: On Top Of the World

Post by statboy »

thats great, i wonder what they seen in him to have that much confidence in him. and they didnt have to give up any high draft pics or big contracts to get him.
I am gambit. I have no life.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

And it makes you wonder how 11 teams could pass on this incredible talent! Make that 12 - the Skins let him go!

Tim's a decent QB, but give me a break, he's just a decent QB!
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
statboy
swine
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 9:09 pm
Location: On Top Of the World

Post by statboy »

SkinsJock wrote:And it makes you wonder how 11 teams could pass on this incredible talent! Make that 12 - the Skins let him go!

Tim's a decent QB, but give me a break, he's just a decent QB!


but wasnt he better then brunell last year, during preseason he had better stats then brunell and ramsey
I am gambit. I have no life.
User avatar
ejay183
Hog
Posts: 1062
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 7:35 pm
Location: Southeast D.C.

Post by ejay183 »

statboy wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:And it makes you wonder how 11 teams could pass on this incredible talent! Make that 12 - the Skins let him go!

Tim's a decent QB, but give me a break, he's just a decent QB!


but wasnt he better then brunell last year, during preseason he had better stats then brunell and ramsey


Thanks true, the man can play, he was just stuck deep in the depth charts
Clinton Portis 2005-2006 Season tracker
352 carries 1516 yards 11 TDs
30 receptions 216 yards 0 TDs
1/2 17 yards 1 TD 118.8
SKINZ_DOMIN8
Domin8
Domin8
Posts: 583
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:44 pm

Post by SKINZ_DOMIN8 »

Good for him. Not like Eli is going to do anything anyways with the Manning curse. So he should be able to start a few games next season.
***Poster of the Year*** Hail to the Redskins. Everything else is inferior. Guess who's not a HOMER on this site.
Gibbs' Hog
^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^
Posts: 1283
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 4:24 pm
Location: G-town, MD

Post by Gibbs' Hog »

statboy wrote:but wasnt he better then brunell last year, during preseason he had better stats then brunell and ramsey


I think he can be a solid QB, but preseason stats are worthless unless we're only talking first quarter...

I liked what I saw in him during the few games he started two years ago; he's not a superstar, but if he gets more starting experience, I think we'll be hearing more about him.
Gibbs' Hog
^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^
Posts: 1283
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 4:24 pm
Location: G-town, MD

Post by Gibbs' Hog »

SKINZ_DOMIN8 wrote:Good for him. Not like Eli is going to do anything anyways with the Manning curse. So he should be able to start a few games next season.



Eli is cursed because he is a crybaby. Since when is it okay for a number one draft pick to "choose" which team he wants to play for?

I didn't have a problem with the guy before last year's draft, but it really peeved me off that he was complaining about not wanting to play for SD. Things worked out well for the Chargers in the end last year, but that punk ass shouldn't have gotten any playing time anywhere IMO.
User avatar
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~
Posts: 8496
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Post by REDEEMEDSKIN »

Who else is rootin' for Eli to fall in the depth chart?? Go Hassy!
Back and better than ever!
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

Eli (& his family) were an embarrassment in how they manipulated things last year and it would be a little rewarding to see him get a little humbled initially. He may be as good as the "experts" think but I would love to see him "not work out" initially.

Good luck to Hass! He was never going to get a chance here and if Gibbs let him go then that means he could not have had much promise for the type of QB that Joe is looking for. If Joe thinks that Brunell is "okay" as the back up then so be it but Tim might suit these guys better.

At least he's not with the pukes who IMO really need help at QB - there are no "stats" that make that trio look good to anybody but an ignorant puke fan. As bad as Mark was last year he would probably be better than any of those guys!
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
SKINZ_DOMIN8
Domin8
Domin8
Posts: 583
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:44 pm

Post by SKINZ_DOMIN8 »

SkinsJock wrote:Eli (& his family) were an embarrassment in how they manipulated things last year and it would be a little rewarding to see him get a little humbled initially. He may be as good as the "experts" think but I would love to see him "not work out" initially.

Good luck to Hass! He was never going to get a chance here and if Gibbs let him go then that means he could not have had much promise for the type of QB that Joe is looking for. If Joe thinks that Brunell is "okay" as the back up then so be it but Tim might suit these guys better.

At least he's not with the pukes who IMO really need help at QB - there are no "stats" that make that trio look good to anybody but an ignorant puke fan. As bad as Mark was last year he would probably be better than any of those guys!


Excellent Post.
***Poster of the Year*** Hail to the Redskins. Everything else is inferior. Guess who's not a HOMER on this site.
User avatar
Hooligan
Hog
Posts: 1266
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:56 pm
Location: New Jersey

Post by Hooligan »

Hopefully our LB's don't tee off on him too badly. I like Hasselbeck.
"Even a stopped clock is right twice a day."
Post Reply