Leave the defense alone????

Washington Football Game Day discussions for 2003, 2004, and 2005
Locked
ii7-V7
~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~
Posts: 1754
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:12 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Leave the defense alone????

Post by ii7-V7 »

Last year the Redskins surprised everyone with thier aggressive defense. Despite missing several starters the Skins defense was the Best in the NFC and 3rd overall. So many posters are saying, "Leave the Defense Alone!" They would rather us draft on the Offense side of the ball. However, Defense is usually an area where talent has a larger immediate impact that it would on Offense. Offense is much more a matter of getting guys to play on the same page. Offense requires consistency. On a defense individual talent and effort can evelate the entire unit. Not neccesarily so for the offense.

Last year was not the first time in recent memory that the Skins D has ranked in the top five. During Marvin Lewis first year the Skins were the fifth ranked defense in the league, but the following year with basically the same personnel the defense plummetted to #25. A large part of that fall was due to Marvin Lewis' departure. But not all of it can be blamed on the coordinator when the personnel were practically the same.

Despite the outstanding defensive performance, and abysmal offensive performance last year it is the future of the Defense that I worry about.

This offseason we lost two solid contributers in Pierce and Smoot. I'm not willing to crown Pierce as the next Ray Lewis just yet. He was system player who performed very well under Williams, but thats it. The Giants aquired Pierce and suddenly they have false hopes of returning to the glory days of the mid to late eighties.

The bigger loss was Smoot. Smoot was a leader and a good player, but perhaps more importantly he was young. Last year we were already thin at Cornerback. Smoot departure leves us with four CB's. The two projected starters are over 30. Wilds showed sparks in limited playing time but it is unclear whether he will be able to perform as well as he would need to should Springs or Harris go down. The fourth Corner is Ade Jimoh....nuff said! Of our two starting safeties...one is a future Hall of Famer with a huge chip on his shoulder and a petential hold out. The other is a quality starter approaching 30.

Our Linebacker situation for the first time in years is cause for concern. Barrow and Arrington are still rehabing and if they are both able to return then we will be in great shape. However we have a 35 year old playing MLB. Marshall's starting experience from last year helps to provide some insurance at both the Outside and Mike LB spots. This unit should perform well barring any injuries, but once again depth and age are a concern.

The Redksins have had a pretty strong back seven for years. Now the back seven is aging and thin. But that isn't the only place where the skins are aging.

The D-line last year had very low expectations which they were able to supercede. The Addition of Cornelius Griffin tuned out to be much better than expected. That Griffin didn't get a pro-bowl nod is robbery. Outside of Griffin we have Renaldo Wynn, Brandon Noble, Phillip Daniels, Joe Salavea....all 30 or over by opening day.

We were able to get pressure on opposing QB's last year but it was rarely the D-line itself causing that pressure. It was often a CB blitz, or a seven man rush that produced the sacks. That kind of aggressiveness can backfire on you. We have decent depth on the D-line but only one real impact player, Griffin.

This year we will not be able to rely on sticky man-to-man coverage like we were last year. We have to draft a CB. We only have four. But if we were to draft a quality cover man (as opposed to getting a CB on the second day) then we could once again use creative blitz packages to take pressure off of the D-line. Or we could draft an impact pass rusher and take the pressure off of the secondary. Without doing one of these things you can surely bet that the Skins defense will not live up to last years standards.

When you have a strength on a team you want to keep that strength and even build upon it. Last year we had a very good defense....not 2000 ravens or 85 bears good, but good. If we can add youth and talent to that squad then we could have a truly dominant Defense for years to come. If we rest on our laurels then don't expect the defense to get better.

So what about the horrid offensive performance last year? Well, despite our performance last year this is the side of the ball with the most talent. Portis, Moss, Randy Thomas, Samuels, Jansen, Ramsey, Cooley. We have depth and youth in most of our offensive units. Folks are lamenting our lack of a prototypical number one reciever, but I ask you what about last year when we did have a legit number one? Did it help us? We also had two tall WR's Gardner and McCants. Didn't seem to help. Inconsistent O-Line play, Swithching QB's, and Gibbs first season jitters I think attribute to our Offense grossly underachieving. It certainly wasn't a lack of personnell.

We could use an upgrade at TE....particularly we could use a big blocking TE. And I certainly wouldn't turn my nose up at a great talent at WR....but I've heard the hype before about top ten WR's and seen them turn into average players too many times to get my hopes up. We have plenty of young burners in that unit who haven't had an adequate shot at showing what they can do. I won't be upset if we go into this year with the Offense exactly as it is now. Consistency and improved O-line and Ramsey under Center will improve our Offense. Not to mention Gibbs second year is bound to be better than the first.

I won't be upset with whatever Gibbs decides to do, but I think that neglecting the Defense will lead to decline for that unit not just this year but in the future. We are old and thin at Defense. Our offense has plenty of young talent....they just need to learn to put it together.

Chad
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

Look at it like this. The departure of players like Pierce and Smoot is proof that we have turned the corner. In the past we operated like the Giants and Vikings...i.e. overpaying a guy who the other team knew was not worth the dollar. (Remember Jeremeiah Trotter, and Jessie Armstead)

We are back to the basics and I am confident in the direction of this team.

I think this is the best offseason in the last decade. WHY?

Well...continuity...and character. Those two c words are what we are building. We will have continuity, and we are bringing in character guys while letting the 'non-character' guys know what this team is all about.

Those ingredients are more important than the big name player. There will always be individuals on a team...and when you are winning they cease being individuals and we all call them character guys. If Riggins was drunk before a game wearing a mohawk...and we lost...he would have been a problem.

Change that one variable to WINNING football...and you've got a dynamic personality.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
ii7-V7
~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~
Posts: 1754
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:12 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Post by ii7-V7 »

I absolutely agree with you. I'm glad that we are having a low key offseason. We are finally showing some fiscal responsibility and we are trying to build from within. That makes me happy for our future under Gibbs/Williams.

Still, we do have draft picks and we have to draft someone with them. I hear a lot of people saying to just leave the Defense alone and draft for all Offense, normally I would think that this was a good idea. But, when you look at the offensive personnel and the defensive personnel which do you think is the unit that is deeper and younger? I don't see how you could say it was the Defense?

I'mnot opposed to draftin on the Offense if the right guys are there when we pick but I think it would be irresponsible to not address the older and thinner defense!

Chad
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

I agree...we defintely need to pick up a corner back in the draft. Im not completely sold on the idea that it must be with the 9th pick, as the difference between Jones, Rogers, and say Justin Miller and Marlin Jackson is difficult to tell just yet.

There is a lot of talent out there. I would be happy with anyone from: Rolle, Merriman, Pac-Man to Troy Williamson, Mark Clayton, or whoever else the staff thinks will be a great pickup for us. Each year the season teaches us a lesson, that where the person is drafted has minimal correlation to how much they ultimately help the team.

Where a player is drafted has more of an impact on whether the player makes the team, or gets playing time (size of contract) but once rookies make the team, they must perform....and the round in which they were selected is of minimal import. I agree with you...im just ready for Tagliabue to approach the podium and say "49ers are on the clock"
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
ii7-V7
~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~
Posts: 1754
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:12 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Post by ii7-V7 »

Yeah, its definetly exciting. Five whole picks! I'm not being sarcastic by the way. I'm actually excited that we have five picks. What we need to do is study how teams like the Eagles ended up with 13 draft selections. One or two years like that and our depth and youth issue will be over!

Chad
Locked