Ed Hartwell signs with Atlanta

Skinsfan55 · Post by **Skinsfan55** » Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:26 pm

Dang, I really wanted him to play in Washington... oh well, hopefully we get Brown.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/s ... id=2018331

Hog Heaven · Post by **Hog Heaven** » Mon Mar 21, 2005 2:14 pm

I was hoping for him too, but I didn't expect to get him. He'll be a great fit for Atlanta's D though. I hope we don't run into them in the Playoffs!

andyjens89 · Post by **andyjens89** » Mon Mar 21, 2005 5:43 pm

Standout inside linebacker Ed Hartwell, arguably the premier player remaining in the unrestricted free agent pool, has reached a contract agreement with the Atlanta Falcons, ESPN.com has learned.

The deal, which came after days of intense negotiations, fits nicely with Atlanta's often-stated offseason priority of further upgrading a defense that statistically ranked 14th in the NFL in 2004. A four-year veteran who had played his entire career with the Baltimore Ravens, Hartwell is the fourth defensive free agent signed by the Falcons, joining safeties Rich Coady and Ronnie Heard and linebacker Ike Reese.

Certainly the aggressive Hartwell is the Falcons' highest-profile offseason addition and, by far, the highest paid. Despite its need to upgrade at linebacker and safety, and to add more speed to both positions, Atlanta had spent modestly in the opening three weeks of the free agent period.

Hartwell's six-year contract totals $26.25 million and includes an $8 million signing bonus. There are additional base salary guarantees in the first three seasons of the contract. The deal will pay Hartwell $10 million in its first two years and $13.25 million over the first three seasons.

In the end, Hartwell chose the Falcons over the Kansas City Chiefs. Seattle had been in the chase for him as well but, over the past few days, dropped out of the bidding. Agent Harold Lewis negotiated extensively with officials from Atlanta and Kansas City over the weekend and the deal came together when the Falcons raised their offer from $4 million per year, a number on which they had been stuck for days.

link: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2018331

andyjens89 · Post by **andyjens89** » Mon Mar 21, 2005 5:44 pm

oops sorry i didnt see the other one

hailskins666 · Post by **hailskins666** » Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:30 am

merged. carry on.

tcwest10 · Post by **tcwest10** » Tue Mar 22, 2005 10:58 pm

Hartwell was a luxury we could ill afford.
This marks the first time I have ever used those two words together. I sound British.
Oh, blimey. Anyway, pop 'round the gorn and scumble and...Jack's a donut, there you are ! He wanted too much money. Again, if we were gonna spend mad money somewhere, we'd still have Smoot and Pierce.
Too bad.

washington53 · Post by **washington53** » Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:42 pm

i agree 100% with TC... Plus were loaded at linebackers, we probably have the most skilled group of linebackers. And yeah marshall will do good at mlb

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Ed Hartwell signs with Atlanta

Ed Hartwell signs with Atlanta

Hartwell to Falcons