NFL to consider expansion of instant replay

Talk about the AFC, NFC, the NFL Draft, College Football... anything football that has no Washington Football Team relevance.
Post Reply
NC43Hog
Brown in the Hall
Brown in the Hall
Posts: 4306
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 5:26 pm
Location: Carolina Country
Contact:

NFL to consider expansion of instant replay

Post by NC43Hog »

Thought this was of interest.

NFL to consider expansion of instant replay
 
NFL.com wire reports

NEW YORK (March 16, 2005) -- The NFL is considering expanding instant replay to cover "down by contact" plays that previously were not included in reviews.

Atlanta general manager Rich McKay, chairman of the league's competition committee, said the change will be considered next week in Maui at the annual league meetings.

In the past, replay has not applied to plays ruled dead because an official has blown a whistle calling the runner down.

"Those plays have been misunderstood," he said. "What we're considering would allow for a recovery if replay shows the ball came out before the play was down - even if the whistle has blown."

This will be one of the few years that instant replay itself will not be discussed. It was extended last year for five years although a proposal to put it in permanently was not approved.

"This is why we wanted to have it in for a length of time," McKay said during a conference call to preview the agenda for the meetings. "It gives us time to tweak some things we have in there without having to discuss the entire process."


http://www.nfl.com/news/story/8298180
"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son." - Dean Wormer
User avatar
Texas Hog
... deep in TX
... deep in TX
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 2:50 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Contact:

Post by Texas Hog »

"Those plays have been misunderstood," he said. "What we're considering would allow for a recovery if replay shows the ball came out before the play was down - even if the whistle has blown."

I like this proposed change....however with the reluctance of the officials to blow the whistle nowadays...I'm surprised this really happens that often.
God bless our troops and Joe Gibbs.
We'll miss you, Joe.


#21 gone, but never forgotten.
NC43Hog
Brown in the Hall
Brown in the Hall
Posts: 4306
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 5:26 pm
Location: Carolina Country
Contact:

Post by NC43Hog »

It happened to us a couple of time this past year so I am for it. My question is, if they blow the whistle and everyone stops, do you just get the ball at the spot where it was fumbled?
"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son." - Dean Wormer
User avatar
Primetime42
Hog
Posts: 1727
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 12:09 am
Location: Romo-sexual

Post by Primetime42 »

NC43Hog wrote:It happened to us a couple of time this past year so I am for it. My question is, if they blow the whistle and everyone stops, do you just get the ball at the spot where it was fumbled?
Correct. No runbacks.
"He's a playmaker, that's his label. They used to have strong safeties, but now they got another position: They're called playmakers." -Terence Newman on Roy Williams
NC43Hog
Brown in the Hall
Brown in the Hall
Posts: 4306
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 5:26 pm
Location: Carolina Country
Contact:

Post by NC43Hog »

That would make sense.
"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son." - Dean Wormer
joebagadonuts
Mmmm...donuts
Mmmm...donuts
Posts: 2400
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 3:15 pm
Location: How much text will they let me fit in this 'Location' space? I mean, can I just keep writing and wr

Post by joebagadonuts »

so wait, i'm not sure i understand this. if julius jones (just as an example) fumbles, and after a scramble, the ball is recovered by the skins, but the play is ruled down and the whistle is blown, gibbs can challenge the play. but if gibbs wins the challenge, the skins get the ball, even though, theoretically, play has stopped on the field prior to the reovery? seems a bit fishy to me.
I'm a jack of all trades, the master of three
Rockin' the tables, rockin' the mikes, rockin' the young lay-dees.
User avatar
Primetime42
Hog
Posts: 1727
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 12:09 am
Location: Romo-sexual

Post by Primetime42 »

joebagadonuts wrote:so wait, i'm not sure i understand this. if julius jones (just as an example) fumbles, and after a scramble, the ball is recovered by the skins, but the play is ruled down and the whistle is blown, gibbs can challenge the play. but if gibbs wins the challenge, the skins get the ball, even though, theoretically, play has stopped on the field prior to the reovery? seems a bit fishy to me.
That's it.


Not that Jules would fumble, of course :wink:
"He's a playmaker, that's his label. They used to have strong safeties, but now they got another position: They're called playmakers." -Terence Newman on Roy Williams
NikiH
+++
+++
Posts: 4448
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 3:02 pm

Post by NikiH »

Why don't they expand instant replay to cover the penalty calls, that is where the refs are really lacking. I know it'd add time to the length of the game but as a fan I'm willing to have that for a fairly officiated game!
Whenever I start to get blue, I just breathe!

My favortie line from the Simpsons:

Flanders: "Looks like someone is having a pre-rapture party!"

Homer: "No Flanders, it's a meeting of gay witches for abortion , you wouldn't be interested!"
User avatar
Primetime42
Hog
Posts: 1727
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 12:09 am
Location: Romo-sexual

Post by Primetime42 »

NikiH wrote:Why don't they expand instant replay to cover the penalty calls, that is where the refs are really lacking. I know it'd add time to the length of the game but as a fan I'm willing to have that for a fairly officiated game!
Because it would "undermine" the refs and hinder their ability to call a game.

Then you'd get the pundits who say human error is part of the game.
"He's a playmaker, that's his label. They used to have strong safeties, but now they got another position: They're called playmakers." -Terence Newman on Roy Williams
NikiH
+++
+++
Posts: 4448
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 3:02 pm

Post by NikiH »

Well it may undermind it but I would believe they may start actually pay attention and get it right after being undermined for a while.
Whenever I start to get blue, I just breathe!

My favortie line from the Simpsons:

Flanders: "Looks like someone is having a pre-rapture party!"

Homer: "No Flanders, it's a meeting of gay witches for abortion , you wouldn't be interested!"
tcwest10
put AM in the HOF
put AM in the HOF
Posts: 8730
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 10:08 pm
Location: NEPA

Post by tcwest10 »

They'd probably have to cut halftime down to, like, seventeen seconds if they allowed every disagreeable thing to be challenged.
Once you start increasing the number of incidents that can be challenged, couldn't it be assumed that in a few seasons you'd likely have to increase the number of challenges a coach can make ?
Pretty soon, you'll see red flags flying on the coin toss. The defensive captain will say he said "well..." in a southern accent while the referee hears "tails", and they'll have an Official Lip Reader in the booth and...
You know what ? This is definitely my last beer. :)
(again.)
"Sit back and watch the Redskins.
SOMETHING MAGICAL IS ABOUT TO BEGIN!"
JPFair- A fan's fan. RIP, brother
Post Reply