Moss coming to Redskins afterall!?!

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
oafusp
Hog
Posts: 1977
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: VA

Moss coming to Redskins afterall!?!

Post by oafusp »

Santana Moss that is.

It is swirling right now. I have heard it twice in the last 5 minutes.

Straight up trade for Coles. I think I heard that Moss has a base salary of $400,000 next season. The JETS will pick up Coles' $5 million roster bonus...NOT THE REDSKINS!

As I said in a recent post I wish the Jets would throw in MLB Sam Cowart too...they are going to cut him anyway.


*UPDATE*: - *SportsTalk980 just said that the RAVENS are ALSO BIDDING ON COLES.....* (drive the price up baby!)

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/8228173


INDIANAPOLIS -- Laveranues Coles might be returning to the New York Jets.

NFL sources at this week's scouting combine said the Jets and Washington are close to a deal that would send the unhappy wide receiver back to New York for wide receiver Santana Moss in a straight-player deal.

No announcement is expected before March 2, with one league source cautioning that the two sides are hammering out terms of a trade and that no agreement has been reached.

"But my understanding," he said, "is that this is a real possibility."

The deal would make sense. Though he led the Redskins in receptions in 2004, Coles was unhappy with his role in the Washington offense and recently declined to renegotiate his contract. Moss, who led New York's receivers with five touchdown catches, is entering the last year of his contract and almost surely will command a large salary.

Moss' agent, Drew Rosenhaus, recently expressed an interest in obtaining a luctractive contract extension for the former first-round pick this offseason. But the Jets are more interested in obtaining Coles, an AFC personnel director said, because they believe he's a better receiver.

Moss, who caught a career high 74 passes in 2003 for 1105 yards and 10 touchdowns, is scheduled to earn $448,000 in base pay this year.

Jets' coach Herman Edwards declined to comment Friday morning.

"It's all talk," he said. "(Coles) is under contract so I'll leave that alone."

Coles led the Jets in receiving in 2002 but left when Washington offered a seven-year, $35 million that included a $13 million signing bonus. The Redskins have been working on a deal that reportedly includes Coles' agreement to waive the final installment of his signing bonus -- $5 million -- which is due April 1 -- in return for a trade, with his new team assuming the unpaid portion of the bonus.

*UPDATED*: However, sources said the Jets will not agree to a deal that includes the assumption of the bonus, and that for the trade to go through Washington would have to pay the remaining sum. They also said the Redskins seem willing to pay it.

While Coles led the Redskins with 90 catches last season, he had only 950 yards in receptions and only three catches for more than 22 yards. Coles was frustrated with the team's offense, and coach Joe Gibbs was frustrated with Coles' attitude.

In addition, the club wished he had undergone surgery on a right big toe that he fractured three weeks into the 2003 season. Since the injury he averaged only 11.8 yards a catch, and his only touchdown last year came on a trick play when halfback Clinton Portis threw him a pass.




New from ESPN 1:21 PM EST:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?id=1999620

INDIANAPOLIS -- The Washington Redskins and New York Jets are in serious trade negotiations and, if a deal is consummated, it would have the teams' top wide receivers changing uniforms, ESPN.com has learned.

Under terms of the trade proposal, the Redskins would send unhappy wide receiver Laveranues Coles to the Jets, the franchise with which he actually began his career. In return, Washington would get four-year veteran wideout Santana Moss.

League and team sources, here for the annual predraft scouting combine, confirmed the discussions. While the parameters of the trade appear to be in place, and each club seems satisfied with the terms, there remain several hurdles. Foremost among them, as reported Thursday by ESPN.com, is that the Redskins must first create salary cap room to absorb the hit they will take in a Coles trade.

But one team official said on Friday morning that, if he were a betting man, he would wager that the trade eventually is completed.

Jets coach Herm Edwards, asked on Friday if he would be interested in being reunited with Coles, who spent the first three years of his career in New York, declined comment, citing NFL anti-tampering rules.

"Man, I'm not going there, OK?" Edwards said, laughing. "(Coles) is under contract to another team. I don't want the commissioner coming after me."

The Jets clearly feel, though, that Coles is the better receiver of the two. The Jets did not want to let Coles escape in 2002, but the terms of the restricted free agent offer sheet to which the Redskins signed him, a seven-year deal worth $35 million and including a $13 million signing bonus, were too prohibitive to match.

Washington, which has decided it will move Coles, who has complained about the lack of verticality in the Redskins' offense, covets Moss' explosiveness.

Moss, 25, was the Jets' first-round choice in the 2001 draft and the former Miami (Fla.) star has been a productive playmaker when healthy. There have been times, however, when Moss has missed time with hamstring and knee injuries. In four seasons, he had 29 starts in 51 appearances, with 151 receptions for 2,416 yards and 19 touchdowns. His best season came in 2003, when he posted 74 catches, 1,105 yards and nine scores.

He is entering the final year of his original rookie contract and is scheduled to earn a base salary of $448,000 in 2005. Washington will seek a contract extension with Moss before completing any deal for him, but that should not be a problem. Drew Rosenhaus, the agent for Moss, has worked with Redskins owner Dan Snyder on several contracts in the past and the two men have a strong relationship.

Before the Redskins can complete any Coles trade, though, they must first carve out a considerable amount of cap room.

The salary cap math involved in the Coles' mess: If Washington trades the wide receiver, whom they signed as a restricted free agent in 2003, forfeiting a first-round draft choice to the Jets in that transaction, they face a cap impact in excess of $9 million.

Efforts to have Coles bypass a $5 million deferred signing bonus due him on April 1, a move that would have dramatically decreased the cap hit, seem to have fallen apart. Coles originally had agreed to forfeit the $5 million, but only as part of an agreement that he would be released, and able to choose his next team.
The Redskins don't have the cap space sufficient to afford the $9 million charge that would accompany a Coles trade. But offensive tackle Chris Samuels, whose cap charge for 2005 is $9.5 million and who is due $6.5 million in base salary and bonuses, can provide desperately needed room if he agrees to a new deal.

Samuels, 27, is agreeable to an extension but the numbers must be right before the five-year veteran, a first-round pick in the 2000 draft, signs off on a reworked contract. As of Thursday afternoon, despite accelerated negotiations between the Redskins and Samuels' agent, an accord was not imminent.

Agent Jimmy Sexton in January sent the Redskins a contract proposal that was rejected by Washington officials. A month later, the Redskins would love to strike a deal based on those January figures. Problem is, with the big-money contracts already signed during this offseason by Walter Jones of Seattle and Indianapolis' Ryan Diem, the financial landscape for offensive tackles has been altered.

Jones received a signing bonus of $16 million on a seven-year contract with total value of $52.5 million. Although he is one of the better left tackles in the league, Samuels does not rate in Jones' elite class. But Samuels still will merit a contract with a signing bonus close to what Jones received, with a per-year average of at least $6 million.
Last edited by oafusp on Fri Feb 25, 2005 3:19 pm, edited 9 times in total.
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

I love Santana Moss, but straight up for Coles? I don't know... I guess if it would give us more cap space and we could draft Mike Williams...

Cowart would be nice too...
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
air_hog
~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~
Posts: 2765
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 10:01 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by air_hog »

Thats cool, i would like Santana Moss. I kind of think he is like LColes in a way because they are both small, fast, and tough.

Come on Mr. Samuels, just sign that contract and I will buy your Jersey on Redskins.com for 30$.

Did you hear that Jake, they have 30$ Chris Samuels jerseys on the online redskins store, and even though you probably already have one, now you can have two.
joebagadonuts on IsaneBoost's signature:
-- "I laughed. I cried. Better than Cats"
oafusp
Hog
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: VA

Post by oafusp »

Actually, it looks like this can be done with or without Chris Samuels realizing that he is not the best left tackle in the NFL.


It comes down to the NFL Management Council ...a trade like this has not happened before and they might hold it up. I am sure they don't want this to become the "norm".

Coles is a better WR than Moss...but the toe.

The Skins should still target a WR in free agency or the draft.

Vinny, Danny, Joey...if you read this get Cowhart thrown in the deal to incase Pierce bolts...he is better than Barrow IMO.

L C - GOOD RIDDANCE!!!
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

Man, I want to see #83 Santana Moss out there so badly, he's a major talent, not only fast but an incredible playmaker and a fearless small guy.

He's even smaller than Coles, here are his two scouting reports:

2004 Scouting Report - Football Scouts Inc.
Name: Santana Moss
Grade: 68 | Key
Alert: B

Comment:
Moss is an extremely elusive and explosive return man and shows the change of direction skills and agility to make tacklers miss in the open field. Has great speed and was a track guy while in school at the University of Miami. He runs with great technique and shows the ability to outrun most defenders in the open field. Shows good patience and vision. Is an absolute playmaker that shows the ability to go the distance every time that he touches the ball. He is undersized and fearless so durability is always going to be a concern but he proved last year that he could endure a full NFL season as both a starting receiver and return man.

Name: Santana Moss
Position: Wide Receiver
Grade: 76 | Key
Alert: B

Comment:
Moss explodes out of cuts, runs precise routes and excels at generating separation working against man coverage. Changes directions without losing much speed in transition, shows effective double moves and will occasionally turns defensive backs around. Has the elusiveness to make multiple defenders miss and is a threat to make something happen every time touches the ball. Shows great body control and can adjust to the ball while it's in the air. Catches the ball with hands away from frame, can catch the ball at its highest point and will make some acrobatic receptions. Moss generally uses his quick feet and rare agility to avoid the jam at the line but he lacks prototypical size, he lacks the upper body strength to beat the jam when a corner gets into his frame and bigger corners will have some success muscling him out of his routes. Lacks bulk, doesn't show great power at the point of attack and offers little as a blocker though gives good effort. He is a marginal No. 1 and an excellent No. 2.


=P~

No idea why they have two reports, but 68 means adaquate starter (69 is the cutoff) and 76 means solid starter (79 cutoff)

FYI, Coles is rated as a 83 for outstanding player...

Still, I would love to see what Moss could do for us, especially when teamed up with Mike Williams... :)
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
BringThePain!
Hog
Posts: 3887
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 11:49 pm
Location: inside the matrix... do not unplug

Post by BringThePain! »

Ugh... I don't like this unless they throw in a pick or something... Toe or not... Coles can play like a Number 1 given the opportunity.... Moss I'm not so sure about being able to play as a number 1.... I think a second or third would make this deal more even.... My 2 cents
**SPECIAL EDITION**

CurveBall - "It might be YOUR biggest game of the year but it really doesn't seem to be as big a deal for Dallas fans anymore."

Oopsies! What's that taste like?
oafusp
Hog
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: VA

Post by oafusp »

Moss is one hell of a punt returner too. BUT not as good as Coles. (If The Toe is done then they are even...but I think The Toe is fine)

:)


Don't want to get too excited though...there are still other teams interested.

However, if the Jets trade goes down it will be one of the oddest events in NFL history...flip-flopping with the Jets has produced John Riggins, Coles, and maybe Moss...
Last edited by oafusp on Fri Feb 25, 2005 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

Yeah, possibly, but I'm starting to trust Gibbs more and more... if this seems like one of "his" guys, ala Marcus Washington, Chris Cooley etc. etc. it might be a nice boost to his career.

I would like to get a little more, but if we shaved off enough salary to sign a nice DE in free agency or a DT or giving us the money to sign Smoot...
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
oafusp
Hog
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: VA

Post by oafusp »

Skinsfan55 wrote:Yeah, possibly, but I'm starting to trust Gibbs more and more... if this seems like one of "his" guys, ala Marcus Washington, Chris Cooley etc. etc. it might be a nice boost to his career.



Moss and Coles are good friends, I think this could get ugly.
It is widely know that Moss wants more $$$$$$$$$. He is demanding more money with the Jets...add the fact that Laverneous is going to tell him "how bad it is here"....and you might have more drama.

I really think LC and Moss are the same character wise.

The Skins would immediately give Moss and extension...otherwise they could risk losing him next season when he is a free agent.
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

Maybe Moss will tell him how great is is to catch deep balls from Ramsey, haha

It's not like Coles wouldn't have gotten his chance to catch the deep ball this season, but we were pretty limited by his toe and Brunell and whatnot.
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
oafusp
Hog
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: VA

Post by oafusp »

A little off subject but....Do you think Coles fears/feared that Gibbs will try to put Brunell back under center at some point.

We all know that Coles likes Ramsey...but may fear that there will be another season of quarterback switch-a-roo. If Coles were to say that publicly I would understand his point...otherwise, he is still a punk.


PS - SportsTalk980 just said that the RAVENS are ALSO BIDDING ON COLES.....
Last edited by oafusp on Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
vtfootball07
Hog
Posts: 327
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 12:49 pm
Location: Blacksburg, VA

Post by vtfootball07 »

This is made extremely difficult by the fact that Moss will want a fat paycheck. I don't like this deal straight up because I feel that a healthy Coles is better than Moss. LC's toe si the only issue. I definitely think that Moss could be a good burner to stretch the field for us, unlike Coles was able to do last season. I would prefer to get a pick thrown in as well, being that we would receive a guy in a contract year for a guy with a long term deal. I'm still quite skeptical about our cap situation years from now. Lets hope that Danny, Vinny, and Eric Schaffer prove everyone wrong and prove to be cap gurus.
oafusp
Hog
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: VA

Post by oafusp »

vtfootball07 wrote:This is made extremely difficult by the fact that Moss will want a fat paycheck. I don't like this deal straight up because I feel that a healthy Coles is better than Moss. LC's toe si the only issue. I definitely think that Moss could be a good burner to stretch the field for us, unlike Coles was able to do last season. I would prefer to get a pick thrown in as well, being that we would receive a guy in a contract year for a guy with a long term deal. I'm still quite skeptical about our cap situation years from now. Lets hope that Danny, Vinny, and Eric Schaffer prove everyone wrong and prove to be cap gurus.



Well....I guess it does "all come down to The Toe". The Skins wanted Coles to get the operation, he refused, and now they are seeking a similar athelete to stretch the field...I am sure the Skins would give Moss an extension upon signing just like they did with Portis last year...maybe in the $10-12 million range.
redskindave
###
###
Posts: 1716
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 10:49 am
Location: Blaine, Ohio

Post by redskindave »

Cool, I would love that trade, I hope it happens, Santana Moss can also return kicks and is a good reciever, And if it helps us with the cap situation thats just another plus, Hey Chris Samuels?? Please sign!
Hail To The Redskins!
Forty men together can't lose
Blaine Ohio home of Ohios biggest Redskin fan
Every man has to die, Not every man really lives
User avatar
trey53
Hog
Posts: 272
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:19 pm
Location: Alexandria VA

Post by trey53 »

Can't say that straight up Moss for Coles thrills me. I think Coles is hands down a better, tougher receiver, even with his busted toe. We should receive something more than a straight trade. Seriously, who is going to be our #1? Moss ain't a #1. Thrash? That's been attempted already. Jacobs? Unproven. I'd rather try get Abraham or better yet try to get a second 1st round pick. (from any team)
She turned me into a newt! ...I got better.
oafusp
Hog
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: VA

Post by oafusp »

trey53 wrote:Can't say that straight up Moss for Coles thrills me. I think Coles is hands down a better, tougher receiver, even with his busted toe. We should receive something more than a straight trade. Seriously, who is going to be our #1? Moss ain't a #1. Thrash? That's been attempted already. Jacobs? Unproven. I'd rather try get Abrahms or better yet try to get a second 1st round pick. (from any team)


I think we should get Sam Cowhart thrown into the deal as MLB insurance.

As for the "#1 WR" ... this is a telling sign that the Skins will go after one in the draft....and consider one in free agency. The Skins know that Moss is not a #1 WR type.
vtfootball07
Hog
Posts: 327
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 12:49 pm
Location: Blacksburg, VA

Post by vtfootball07 »

Even though they are the next door neighbors, if Baltimore is in fact bidding on Coles, then I wonder what they would offer. Maybe a draft pick? They don't have any receivers that spark my interest. I guess I'm really into the idea of building through the draft, especially because we could get a first round WR locked up for more years than we would get Moss at and at a lower price tag. Imagine what we could do with 2 first round picks....
User avatar
trey53
Hog
Posts: 272
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:19 pm
Location: Alexandria VA

Post by trey53 »

I think we should get Sam Cowhart thrown into the deal as MLB insurance.


I could live with that.
She turned me into a newt! ...I got better.
Justin
newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 2:05 am
Location: Las Vegas

Post by Justin »

At this point, I would simply be happy getting anything in return for not having Coles on the team. We are certainly not in the strongest of positions to negotiate so personally whether we get a couple draft picks (preferably) or a former 1st round WR I would be pretty happy when all is said and done.

The interesting thing to me about the proposed deal for Moss is the history of both teams with both players. Moss was drafted in the same year that we drafted Gardner. That year Marty was the head coach and it was rumored that Snyder was in love with Moss. Marty, wanting a physical receiver, picked Gardner 15th and the Jets took Moss with the next pick.

While I fully believe that this is Joe's team now.... it is interesting to me that the "organization" seems to be going back to Santana. In my saying that, I am not saying that I am against the move because I personally like Moss' explosiveness for this team (Coles simply didn't show any last season). Nevertheless, does anyone else see this as a sign that Snyder is still too involved in personnel decisions or is it just a coincidence?
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Post by Irn-Bru »

Maybe we could make the trade straight up or with an extra draft pick. . .




. . . .and then cut Moss and call it a day. :twisted:
User avatar
Washingtons#1fan
piggie
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 8:18 pm

Post by Washingtons#1fan »

I think that Coles is better than Moss. Then on the other hand i would take moss because you know he will give us 100% all year. Coles wouldn't do that because he wants out.

I would also like it if they threw in a pick as well.
Skeletor
Hog
Posts: 692
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 5:30 pm

Post by Skeletor »

I just don't get how this trade works for the Skins financially. You take a $9 million cap hit in 05 for coles, then you also have to pay Moss the money for an extension. I think a trade only makes sense if Coles waives the $5 signing bonus payment.

The way I can see this working is if the Skins negotiate a contract extension with Moss before the trade, the Jets pay his signing bonus, then make the trade. Then at least some of that $9 million hit reduces Moss' cap hit in later years, but the reports don't seem to mention that scenario, only a straight up trade.

I love getting Moss, but I'm worried about the cap ramifications.
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Post by Irn-Bru »

Washingtons#1fan wrote:I think that Coles is better than Moss. Then on the other hand i would take moss because you know he will give us 100% all year. Coles wouldn't do that because he wants out.

I would also like it if they threw in a pick as well.



Not so fast. . .

Coles' had a pretty good year this year (when you take the toe injury into account), and he certainly played his heart out all season even though he's (reportedly) wanted out since midway through this year(!)

Before we start revising history once Coles' leaves, we have to make sure that we're giving him the respect that he deserves for his hard work in DC.
oafusp
Hog
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: VA

Post by oafusp »

Skeletor wrote:I just don't get how this trade works for the Skins financially. You take a $9 million cap hit in 05 for coles, then you also have to pay Moss the money for an extension. I think a trade only makes sense if Coles waives the $5 signing bonus payment.

The way I can see this working is if the Skins negotiate a contract extension with Moss before the trade, the Jets pay his signing bonus, then make the trade. Then at least some of that $9 million hit reduces Moss' cap hit in later years, but the reports don't seem to mention that scenario, only a straight up trade.

I love getting Moss, but I'm worried about the cap ramifications.



Please re-read the article....slowly.

The trade would be done if Laverneous restructured his contract so the Skins do not owe him the April 1st installment...the Jets would put it in their deal that they will pay the $5 million bonus...instead of the Redskins.

That way Coles gets his money, the Redskins don't get hit on the CAP, and the Jets get their WR back after 2 years.
oafusp
Hog
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: VA

Post by oafusp »

I just heard that it was Clinton Portis that broke the news to his Miami Alumni Santana Moss.

Is Portis the Skins ambassador/General Manager?
First Sean Taylor...now Moss?


Here's another tidbit:

2004:
Santana Moss: 45 Catches, 838 yds, 5 TDs
Rod Gardner: 51 catches, 650 yds, 5 TDs
L. Coles: 90 catches, 950 yds, 1 TD
:roll:
Post Reply