ESPN Coles Trade Article

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
Justin
newbie
Posts: 15
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 2:05 am
Location: Las Vegas

ESPN Coles Trade Article

Post by Justin »

Well, according to Pasquarelli there are at least three teams with serious interest in a trade. Somehow, someway, something will come out of this whole situation.

INDIANAPOLIS -- Several league and team sources attending the annual NFL predraft combine workouts confirmed for ESPN.com Thursday that the Washington Redskins have at least three franchises legitimately interested in trading for unhappy wide receiver Laveranues Coles.

But even with no lack of suitors for Coles, the Redskins still face this knotty problem in trying to strike a deal, one which would likely bring a high-round draft pick in return: Because of the convoluted salary cap ramifications, the Redskins can't peddle Coles to another club until they sell offensive tackle Chris Samuels on restructuring his current and burdensome contract.

And while the Redskins have crept a bit closer to Samuels on a reworked contract, which would extend his current deal and provide Washington much-needed cap relief for 2005, there remains plenty of work to be done to consummate an agreement.

"Right now," said a high-ranking official from one of the franchises attempting to acquire Coles from Washington, "the Redskins are (stuck). They simply can't absorb, at least not yet, the cap hit they'll take from trading Coles. They need to find room and the obvious way is to finish off a new deal with Samuels. But I guess that's not done yet."

The salary cap math involved in the Coles mess: If Washington trades the wide receiver, whom they signed as a restricted free agent in 2003, forfeiting a first-round draft choice to the New York Jets in that transaction, they face a cap impact in excess of $9 million. Efforts to have Coles bypass a $5 million deferred signing bonus due him on April 1, a move that would have dramatically decreased the cap hit, seem to have fallen apart. Coles had originally agreed to forfeit the $5 million, but only as part of an agreement that he would be released, and able to choose his next team.

The Redskins don't have the cap space sufficient to afford the $9 million charge that would accompany a Coles trade. But Samuels, whose cap charge for 2005 is $9.5 million and who is due $6.5 million in base salary and bonuses, can provide desperately needed room if he agrees to a new deal.

Samuels, 27, is agreeable to an extension but the numbers must be right before the five-year veteran, a first-round pick in the 2000 draft, signs off on a reworked contract. As of Thursday afternoon, despite accelerated negotiations between the Redskins and Samuels' agent, an accord was not imminent.

Agent Jimmy Sexton in January sent the Redskins a contract proposal that was rejected by Washington officials. A month later, the Redskins would love to strike a deal based on those January figures. Problem is, with the big-money contracts already signed during this offseason by Walter Jones of Seattle and Indianapolis' Ryan Diem, the financial landscape for offensive tackles has been significantly altered.

Jones received a signing bonus of $16 million on a seven-year contract with total value of $52.5 million. Although he is one of the better left tackles in the league, Samuels does not rate in Jones' elite class, but still will merit a contract with a signing bonus close to what Jones received an a per-year average of at least $6 million.

Until the Redskins come up with the right figures, though, the three teams interested in acquiring Coles figure to be cooling their heels.


http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=1998972
JPFair
****
****
Posts: 2311
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 9:26 am
Location: Boston, Mass

Post by JPFair »

My brain just can't take it anymore!!!
Sit back and watch the Redskins.

SOMETHING MAGICAL IS ABOUT TO BEGIN!
Jeremy81
Hog
Posts: 814
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 11:55 am

Post by Jeremy81 »

so who are the three teams? i know it doesn't really matter until samuels restructures or coles agrees to give up some bonus money, but i'm still curious to know who the three teams are that want a trade...
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

This will workout in the end. I say this for many reasons
1. Samuels will more than likely re-do his contract whin in the next few days
2. It appears that Coles doesn't want to be in Washington
3. Joe Gibbs doesn't want ANYONE here that doesn't want to be here
and the biggest reason of all is
4. Fat boy Pastabelly's article sounds so negative that it has to be wishful thinking on his part
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
User avatar
hkiss444
piggie
Posts: 184
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 4:40 pm
Location: Eldersburg, Md

Post by hkiss444 »

The Redskins need to be careful with the coles situation. If there is another offensive season like last year Portis is going to be asking for the same thing.
Section 228; seats 5-10
BossHog
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9375
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:34 am
Location: London, Ontario
Contact:

Post by BossHog »

I love to slam the guy, but:

That's a good article. No food references, no bashing, lots of good ACCURATE cap information. Lenny gets a whole post from me without Pastabelly in it.

Doh!
Sean Taylor was one of a kind, may he rest in peace.
GoSkins
goskins
goskins
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 4:55 pm
Location: Hampden-Sydney, VA

Post by GoSkins »

OK. So for this to work Samuels needs to restructure. The Skins then trade Coles. And we better get a #1 pick. Now what do we do? We lose up to $9mm against our cap, and we have 2 #1s which will cost us a lot. God this is complicated. The good news is Gibbs is undoing the mess we have gotten ourselves into over the last few years.
Post Reply