Stop LaVar Bashing!

REDEEMEDSKIN · Post by **REDEEMEDSKIN** » Mon Feb 07, 2005 4:03 pm

I was actually sighing...it's feels like so much has transpired since the play that turned around Marty's 8-8 season, and, as you know, not all was good. No harm intended toward you, my friend. Sorry for the mix-up.

Champsturf · Post by **Champsturf** » Mon Feb 07, 2005 6:50 pm

REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
redskincity wrote:....and now that you are out of breathe, will you continue to toot your own whistle concerning Lavar?

or since everybody on this board knows how you feel about Lavar do you have to beat a dead horse?

....or will you continue to contradict yourself with all of your hate post being easily accesible?

So long as this or any other subject keeps coming up, I will continue to post, thank you very much. I will post until the end.

Well, according to you, the end is nearer than we think, so just quit while you're ahead and leave us alone. I absolutely HATE being preached to. It get's old reading the same poster time and time again in the same thread, just repeating himself and me lucky enough to read the BS in his sig.

tcwest10 · Post by **tcwest10** » Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:59 pm

Congrats on 800, Champsturf.
Too bad you're wasting it on something like this and not your usual good stuff.
To each his own, man.

Champsturf · Post by **Champsturf** » Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:52 pm

tcwest10 wrote:Congrats on 800, Champsturf.
Too bad you're wasting it on something like this and not your usual good stuff.
To each his own, man.

Thanks TC. I wasn't even paying attention as to where I was at. I just don't think that this is a religious forum. There's a place for everything, and I don't think that kind of sentiment should be allowed. The Smack forum would be much more appropriate, but not in every single post.

Sorry if I didn't bring my A game. I'll try to pick it back up.

BossHog · Post by **BossHog** » Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:02 am

So now you want me to start censoring people?

And in the forum where there are no rules?

Whatever.

There are NEW signature rules coming very, very soon though... don't you worry. in fact, if you look at your signature and it has colors and/or increased font size, and/or multiple line breaks... you might as well start thinking about what your new one is going to be, because the old one is soon to be a thing of the past.

You'll be able to have whatever you want topically... but it likely won't be anything but plain white text.

Because I'm sick of looking at ALL the signatures that stand out more than a person's post itself... so get ready to be mad at me... 'cause it's coming down the pipe real soon. :shock:

JansenFan · Post by **JansenFan** » Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:42 am

Texas Hog wrote:I'd throw Pete Sampras in that category!

Not til he wins the French Open!!

As far as LaVar, whether or not he is THE Redskin is irelevant. He is A Redskin, and therefore I want him on the field making plays. A few teams would want him? Get real. 32 teams would want him. Unlike fans, front office personnel look for talent and athleticism. He may not be the best linebacker in football, but that doesn't make him a bad linebacker. If you want to get all hung up about potential, that's fine. Personally I worry more about players who can change the game on any given play, and whether you like him or not, LaVar has that ability. That's why every team would want him and that is why I look forward to seeing what LaVar can do with some stability and a good coach to point him in the right direction.

Champsturf · Post by **Champsturf** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:15 pm

BossHog wrote:So now you want me to start censoring people?

And in the forum where there are no rules?

Whatever.

There are NEW signature rules coming very, very soon though... don't you worry. in fact, if you look at your signature and it has colors and/or increased font size, and/or multiple line breaks... you might as well start thinking about what your new one is going to be, because the old one is soon to be a thing of the past.

You'll be able to have whatever you want topically... but it likely won't be anything but plain white text.

Because I'm sick of looking at ALL the signatures that stand out more than a person's post itself... so get ready to be mad at me... 'cause it's coming down the pipe real soon.

No Boss, I don't want you to censor anybody. You do a very good job here and sure don't need any added responsibilities. I want people to censor themselves and have a little respect for everyone here, no matter their point of view on anything.

I think the new sig rules sound great. I too, get very tired of first seeing a bold sig, rather than the post itself.