Skins/Vikings gameday thread

1fan4ramsey · Post by **1fan4ramsey** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:04 pm

7/10 on 3r down today, awesome

Definitiveskinjux- · Post by **Definitiveskinjux-** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:04 pm

Hey, It's the rock

redskincity · Post by **redskincity** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:04 pm

The Rock is in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

tcwest10 · Post by **tcwest10** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:04 pm

Why can't you have both CP and Betts ?

Hooligan · Post by **Hooligan** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:05 pm

Could it be that Betts is a better fit in this system? I know one good game isn't enough to tell, but hmm...

Scottskins · Post by **Scottskins** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:05 pm

ummm, Clinton AND Betts

but mainly Clinton =)

Definitiveskinjux- · Post by **Definitiveskinjux-** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:05 pm

Vikes are gonna cry!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:05 pm

1fan4ramsey wrote:
tcwest10 wrote:There's always the offchance that Betts could blossom late like Stephen did.

then what comes of CP

With the way Gibbs likes to run the ball we'll need two solid backs

redskincity · Post by **redskincity** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:05 pm

Come on Rock you killing me with the loss

1fan4ramsey · Post by **1fan4ramsey** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:05 pm

tcwest10 wrote:Why can't you have both CP and Betts ?

thinking cp might have an issue with that

tcwest10 · Post by **tcwest10** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm

....and that's 118 for Ladell on the ground. Outstanding. I'll bet Byner is giggling like an idiot.

Definitiveskinjux- · Post by **Definitiveskinjux-** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm

Damn, come on why the sack?

redskincity · Post by **redskincity** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm

Ramsey sacked!!!!!!

Here comes our Bread and Butter.

Scottskins · Post by **Scottskins** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm

damn, nice tackle. thought Ramsey was gonna get away on that one

tcwest10 · Post by **tcwest10** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm

1fan4ramsey wrote:
tcwest10 wrote:Why can't you have both CP and Betts ?

thinking cp might have an issue with that

Thinking CP might have to step up vefore his opinion means anything to me, no ?

1fan4ramsey · Post by **1fan4ramsey** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm

Definitiveskinjux- wrote:Damn, come on why the sack?

because the line stinks

Definitiveskinjux- · Post by **Definitiveskinjux-** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm

coming up on 2 min. warning

Scottskins · Post by **Scottskins** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:07 pm

tcwest10 wrote:....and that's 118 for Ladell on the ground. Outstanding. I'll bet Byner is giggling like an idiot.

I know I certainly am!

Definitiveskinjux- · Post by **Definitiveskinjux-** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:07 pm

cough, elton brown.....

Scottskins · Post by **Scottskins** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:07 pm

had the ball for like 5 minutes this drive, perfect =)

Clinton Portis · Post by **Clinton Portis** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:07 pm

tcwest10 wrote:Why can't you have both CP and Betts ?

I'm Scared! Clinton might be replaced!

NOT CP!!!!

But Betts is a close 2nd.

1fan4ramsey · Post by **1fan4ramsey** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:07 pm

tcwest10 wrote:
1fan4ramsey wrote:
tcwest10 wrote:Why can't you have both CP and Betts ?

thinking cp might have an issue with that

Thinking CP might have to step up vefore his opinion means anything to me, no ?

true

welch · Post by **welch** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:07 pm

Could it be that Betts is a better fit in this system? I know one good game isn't enough to tell, but hmm...

Could well be.

Definitiveskinjux- · Post by **Definitiveskinjux-** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:08 pm

Vikes can still get in if they lose

redskincity · Post by **redskincity** » Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:08 pm

Minne gets in if what????????????????