It is official about Joe Gibbs.

Smithian · Post by **Smithian** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:35 pm

He has no ability to coach an offense.

We turn it over regardless and he says he we should be conservative to not turn it over.

A slant pattern on third down; that is God awful.

--

Also, Chris Samuels, shutup. Don't get mad at Derrick Dockery for jumping offsides when you do the same.

HitDoctor · Post by **HitDoctor** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:38 pm

A modern offensive coordinator and we'll be Okay.

chicosbailbond · Post by **chicosbailbond** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 8:46 pm

HitDoctor wrote:A modern offensive coordinator and we'll be Okay.

when Mike Martz gets fired we will get him....

JPM36 · Post by **JPM36** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 8:48 pm

you take that anti- Coach Gibbs crap to some other site man.

if we dont give up that long TD pass and win 10-6 you'd be praising him for finally leading us to a win in Dallas.

SKIN1106 · Post by **SKIN1106** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 8:49 pm

I AM A BIG FAN OF PATRICK ,BUT WHERE WAS HE TODAY?
OUR O-LINE NEEDS SERIOUS HELP(BUGEL WHERE ARE YOU)?
HOW ABOUT THAT ZONE DEFENSE? (COST US THAT TOUCHDOWN AT THE END).
I AM REALLY ANGRY!
I AM SORRY GUYS, BUT IM SICK OF LOSING TO THOSE COWGIRLS. OUR OFFENSE LACKS MOTIVATION.
ONLY ONE MOTIVATED IS LC!!!!
WE NEED HELP....
HOPEFULLY WE ACQUIRE AN OFFENSIVE COORDINATIOR!
TIP:GET RID OF GARDNER...YUK & WORK O-LINE!
LET'S GET A PUNT RETURNER!

hailskins666 · Post by **hailskins666** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 8:57 pm

SKIN1106 wrote:I AM A BIG FAN OF PATRICK ,BUT WHERE WAS HE TODAY?
OUR O-LINE NEEDS SERIOUS HELP(BUGEL WHERE ARE YOU)?
HOW ABOUT THAT ZONE DEFENSE? (COST US THAT TOUCHDOWN AT THE END).
I AM REALLY ANGRY!
I AM SORRY GUYS, BUT IM SICK OF LOSING TO THOSE COWGIRLS. OUR OFFENSE LACKS MOTIVATION.
ONLY ONE MOTIVATED IS LC!!!!
WE NEED HELP....
HOPEFULLY WE ACQUIRE AN OFFENSIVE COORDINATIOR!
TIP:GET RID OF GARDNER...YUK & WORK O-LINE!
LET'S GET A PUNT RETURNER!

agree. lines suck. line coaches too.

madman · Post by **madman** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:01 pm

dont give me wrong i love gibbs,but why did we play so conservative on that last drive.why didnt we at least try to mix it up and get the first down instead of kicking it back to the cowboys on three and out.its flat out disgusting how we lost.you cant blame the defense sure they gave up the td but they were on the field the last five minutes of the game basically.please dont tell me that ramsey is our future bc im tired of hearing that.he is only good when they play a team that is worse than us.tell me the last game he won that mattered.he will never throw it deep bc they dont have faith in him to do so.tell me also when we hit a deep ball in stride for a td i cant remember.there is no way we should of lost that game period.

hailskins666 · Post by **hailskins666** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:09 pm

madman wrote:dont give me wrong i love gibbs,but why did we play so conservative on that last drive.why didnt we at least try to mix it up and get the first down instead of kicking it back to the cowboys on three and out.its flat out disgusting how we lost.you cant blame the defense sure they gave up the td but they were on the field the last five minutes of the game basically.please dont tell me that ramsey is our future bc im tired of hearing that.he is only good when they play a team that is worse than us.tell me the last game he won that mattered.he will never throw it deep bc they dont have faith in him to do so.tell me also when we hit a deep ball in stride for a td i cant remember.there is no way we should of lost that game period.

thanks for the inside scoop. :roll:

it was obviosly ramsey calling the plays and not gibbs. what have we been thinking? ramsey is the true problem, not gibbs. WTF were we thinikg? [sarcasm off]

chicosbailbond · Post by **chicosbailbond** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:12 pm

madman wrote:dont give me wrong i love gibbs,but why did we play so conservative on that last drive.why didnt we at least try to mix it up and get the first down instead of kicking it back to the cowboys on three and out.

Gibbs didn't go conservative... he a called the right plays... a real team and a real offensive line would have closed the game out... hand the ball off three times and get a first down... the game is over...

if you can't see that our offensive line is soft and not motivated you are watching a different team than i am...

our o-line doesn't have heart... they don't play mean... and don't dominate...

if i were a betting man... i say gibbs overhauls this line next year... if he doesn't overhaul it... i bet he won't over pay for samuels... let some other team over pay for him...just like the broncos did for champ...

soft soft soft soft soft... that is our o-line... they are the dirt bags...they suck...

hailskins666 · Post by **hailskins666** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:15 pm

they are the dirt bags...

the name fits.

darkwing99 · Post by **darkwing99** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:19 pm

Raymer = backup

Dockery = backup

Ray Brown = BACKUP

Chris Samuel = MUST RESTRUCTURE OR WE TRADE HIS ASS.

simple as that.

hailskins666 · Post by **hailskins666** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:23 pm

darkwing99 wrote:Raymer = backup

Dockery = backup

Ray Brown = BACKUP

Chris Samuel = MUST RESTRUCTURE OR WE TRADE HIS ASS.

simple as that.

ahem... NO!
chris samuels = BACKUP.

Brandon777 · Post by **Brandon777** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:25 pm

they are the dirt bags...

I was thinking they are more like "the douche bags".

darkwing99 · Post by **darkwing99** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:27 pm

yup, more like douche bags.

HitDoctor · Post by **HitDoctor** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:30 pm

At ease!!

chicosbailbond · Post by **chicosbailbond** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:31 pm

quote]ahem... NO!
chris samuels = BACKUP.[/quote]

i was thinking the same thing... i like cohesion and continuity on the line... but we need to ship him out... he isn't worth the money

hailskins666 · Post by **hailskins666** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:35 pm

what a loser. makin 9 mil a year to let guys blow by him. and most importantly, makin 9 mil a year not to block for the run... except in reverse. sounds like he's earning that salary to me.

patjam77 · Post by **patjam77** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:45 pm

JPM36 wrote:you take that anti- Coach Gibbs crap to some other site man.

if we dont give up that long TD pass and win 10-6 you'd be praising him for finally leading us to a win in Dallas.

he's just posting what he feels. he has every right to say what he wants on this board as long it is in good taste. he is right in a way. the ofense has regressed from last year. williams has done his job and gibbs hasnt done his. as simple as that. i'm not calling for gibbs to resign but in the offseason to get a little more modern as one poster suggested getting a modern day offensive coordinator.

FatPat · Post by **FatPat** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:48 pm

Do you guys think Joe Gibbs would ever give up control of the offense to an offensive coordinatior (is his ego too big to do so)? I think it is something he really has to think about if the redskins are the most important and if he is true to his word about considering any option to win he needs to consider hiring an offensive coordinator to run a modern NFL offense.

hailskins666 · Post by **hailskins666** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 9:53 pm

i think he'll do whats best for the team as far as hiring coaches.... which i'm ALL for. he hasn't done it as of yet. the offense seems to go in reverse.

Definitiveskinjux- · Post by **Definitiveskinjux-** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 10:14 pm

look up inconsistent in the dictionary, it should include the redskins 2004 offense as a definition. I have seem some progress, but I still believe this year was a rebuilding one. In back to back years we have two different coaching staffs with two very different philosophies.

hailskins666 · Post by **hailskins666** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 10:21 pm

i'd like a happy medium between the last 2 coaches. spurrier was off, deep, so is gibbs, short. with the way that pass interference falls this day in age, there is no reason we shouldn't take a deep shot every now and then with our WR's.(even 50/50)

Definitiveskinjux- · Post by **Definitiveskinjux-** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 10:22 pm

Could you imagine spurrier's offense this year? we probably could have won a few more games on PI calls alone!!!

hailskins666 · Post by **hailskins666** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 10:23 pm

Definitiveskinjux- wrote:Could you imagine spurrier's offense this year? we probably could have won a few more games on PI calls alone!!!

that truley is troubleing

SKIN1106 · Post by **SKIN1106** » Sun Dec 26, 2004 11:03 pm

PLAYCALLING HAS NOT BEEN THE BEST,
BUT WE CAN'T CONTINUE TO BLAME THE COACHES...
FOR THE LACK OF EFFORT BY OUR OFFENSE UNIT.
THESE PLAYERS ARE ALL USE TO US POINTING FINGERS AT OUR COACHES....
WHEN REALLY THE PROBLEM IS THE OFFENSE!!!
LET'S SAY THE O-LINE NEEDS SERIOUS HELP!
LET'S GET RID OF SAMUELS, DOCKERY,
BROWN...AND WELL THEY ALL SUCK.
I WISH THAT ONE DAY WE CAN HAVE AN O-LINE LIKE
(LET'S SAY THOSE DAMN BRONCOS). THEY MAKE THE WORST PLAYER...LOOK LIKE THEY CAN PLAY.
WR...GARDNER...PLEASE LET'S JUST TRADE FOR HIM(HE LACKS THE LOVE OF THE GAME).
WE DON'T NEED ALL THESE HIGH PROFILE PLAYERS IN OUR TEAM...ALL THEY WANT IS EASY$$$$$$$$$$$,
BUT THINGS WILL BE DIFFERENT THIS YEAR! THE COACH IS WATCHING...BELIEVE ME
THOSE SLACKERS IN OUR TEAM
WILL NOT BE IN OURS NEXT YEAR!
IM ANGRY...AND I DO APOLOGIZE FOR THE CAPS!
COACH GIBBS KNOWS WHAT HE IS DOING.
GUYS WE ALL KNOW THAT HE DOESN'T HAVE THE RIGHT PERSONEL OUT THERE.
LET'S STOP BLAMING HIM FOR THE PROBLEMS WE ARE FACING.
HAIL TO THE SKINS:)

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

It is official about Joe Gibbs.

It is official about Joe Gibbs.

ARE OFFENSE?

Re: ARE OFFENSE?

IT'S TRUE