Slowly but surely, team is on the rise

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Slowly but surely, team is on the rise

Post by 1niksder »

Slowly but surely, team is on the rise
By Dan Daly


SAN FRANCISCO.
The Redskins are nowhere near as bad as the 49ers, and they needed to make that abundantly clear yesterday. No playing to the level of the competition -- or, perish the thought, actually losing.

They're building for next year now, and it's important they come out of these last few games feeling good about themselves ... or at least less suicidal. It also would be nice to show the world that the near miss against the Eagles was no aberration, that they really are Getting There.

The world has seen a lot of the Redskins this season, probably too much. They've had a Monday night game, two Sunday nighters, yesterday's Saturday date and a bunch of other 4 o'clock starts -- all because of the hoopla surrounding Joe Gibbs' return to the sideline. (What, you thought it was because of their 12-20 record the last two years?)

The Redskins have been perhaps the most visible not so good team in NFL history, and their myriad problems, principally on offense, have been there for all to see.

But now TV viewers are starting to see something else: A club that's slowly moving up in the NFC pecking order, a club that's no longer one of the dregs of the NFC. In the last four weeks, the Redskins have played the Steelers close, blown out the Giants, pushed the Eagles to the limit and, yesterday at Monster Park, clocked the Niners 26-16. That's a month of good, solid football -- which is rarer in the NFL than you might think. It's certainly been rare for the Redskins in recent seasons.

The win over woeful San Francisco was accomplished by the usual means -- a heavy dose of Gregg Williams' defense and just enough of Gibbs' stuck-in-second-gear offense to generate the necessary points. (And had Shawn Springs not been scratched with acute cobwebs after suffering a concussion last week, the margin likely would have been greater.)

But that's just bookkeeping. What was noteworthy about the game -- from the Washington standpoint, at least -- was this:
The Redskins' best run was by a defender, linebacker Antonio Pierce, who returned an interception 78 yards for a touchdown late in the first half to break things open.

The Redskins' best catch also was by a defender, end Ron Warner, who dropped into coverage, picked off a wobbly Ken Dorsey pass and rumbled/stumbled/bumbled 39 yards to set up a field goal.

And the Redskins' best block was by a defender, too, linebacker Chris Clemons, who waylaid Dorsey to help clear the way for Pierce on his INT/TD.

With a defense like that, who needs an offense?
"If you look at the stat sheet," Fred Smoot said, "you'll see that [the tackles, sacks, interceptions, etc., are] all spread out. There's no one dominant guy. That's what makes this group special, man. Somebody goes down, somebody else steps in."

True enough, though I'm not sure anyone expected the 6-foot-3, 270-pound Warner to pick up the slack for the 6-0, 200-pound Springs -- Warner least of all. "My first pick since high school," he said with a mixture of pride and disbelief.

It couldn't have come at a better time either because while Patrick Ramsey and Co. were able to move the ball on the Niners, they had all kinds of trouble near the goal line. A first-and-goal at the San Francisco 3 produced only a 25-yard field goal. A second-and-goal at the San Francisco 3 led to just a 21-yard field goal. And the Redskins' longest drive of the day, a 78-yarder that reached the San Francisco 2, yielded merely a 25-yard field goal.
This against a 2-12 team with nothing to play for -- except the first pick in the draft.

"Not to rain on our parade," said Ramsey, "but we've got to stick the ball in the end zone when we get down there. We're playing some of the better teams in the league [these next two weeks], and it's something we've got to focus on and get done."

Actually, there's no parade to rain on. It has been a season of struggle for the Redskins offense, from first to last, and that doesn't figure to change in the last two games against the Cowboys and Vikings. But there are some hopeful signs for the future, "things we can count on," as Gibbs said. Like Clinton Portis' willingness to run until his tongue hangs out. Like Ramsey's growing ability to avoid the Big Mistake -- and to convert third downs by fitting the ball into tight places. Like Laveranues Coles' heart.

At the end of last season, it was all coming apart for the Redskins. They were in the process of losing 11 of their final 13 games. Indeed, they were the kind of like the 49ers are now. But things are starting to come together for them, albeit slowly. And if these next two games are anything like the last four, it won't be nearly so cold a winter.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/function ... 4027-1086r
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
User avatar
DESkins
Hog
Posts: 1656
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:01 am
Location: Wilmington, DE

Post by DESkins »

"Not to rain on our parade," said Ramsey, "but we've got to stick the ball in the end zone when we get down there. We're playing some of the better teams in the league [these next two weeks], and it's something we've got to focus on and get done."

Sounds like Ramsey is being realistic in assessing the performance of the offense. Now, let's hope that they get it done in the next two games.
R.I.P. Andrew McDonough 9/3/92 - 7/14/07. Love & miss you, #20.
RedskinsRule56
Hog
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 6:56 pm
Location: DC

Post by RedskinsRule56 »

I would sure hope that article says we are no where near as bad as the Niners they are clearly the worst team in the league! COME ON!
"SUCK FOR LUCK"
User avatar
DESkins
Hog
Posts: 1656
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:01 am
Location: Wilmington, DE

Post by DESkins »

I think the article was pointing out similarities between the Redskins of last season and the 9'ers this season, but acknowledging that the the 'Skins still have a ways to go on offense, which should not come as any great surprise. But the first paragraph says that the Redskins are not nearly as bad as the 9'ers.
R.I.P. Andrew McDonough 9/3/92 - 7/14/07. Love & miss you, #20.
User avatar
Rypien11
newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 2:53 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Post by Rypien11 »

What if Ramsey had started game one? Maybe worth another win or 2 this season, which in the 2004 NFC is right in the thick of the playoffs.
Sincerely,
From a loyal and lifelong REDSKINS fan living in the heart of enemy territory, forced to drive past that most unwanted of places known as Texas Stadium every day!
GO SKINS!!!
User avatar
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~
Posts: 8496
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Post by REDEEMEDSKIN »

What if Ramsey had started game one? Maybe worth another win or 2 this season, which in the 2004 NFC is right in the thick of the playoffs.


Huh? I thought we WON game 1, with Marky mark under center. I think, had we executed better as a team, we'd be rightfully in the thick of things. Keep in mind, we're still in the playoff hunt, though some might think undeservedly so.
Back and better than ever!
User avatar
Cooley47
Hog
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 9:01 pm
Location: Redskinz Country!!!

Post by Cooley47 »

If Pat had started from Day one we would have beaten the Cowboys, Giants and the Browns at least

We would be in the playoffs
I miss you 21.

God I wish we had a second round pick.
User avatar
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~
Posts: 8496
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Post by REDEEMEDSKIN »

CORRECTION: We MAY have won against those teams. Let's not forget Pat's poor performances during pre-season, which, more than likely, he would have brought into the regular season from Day 1.

He looks like he's improved quite a bit since then, but he is nowhere near a consistent level, yet. Perhaps a little playoff run will light a spark under him and help him reach his potential.
Back and better than ever!
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

Yes, we may have lost a few early games, but Patrick would be that much better for it now. It wasn't like Brunell had an awesome pre-season.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
Wysocki
+++++++
+++++++
Posts: 732
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 12:33 pm
Location: Southern Maryland

Post by Wysocki »

Rypien11 wrote:What if Ramsey had started game one? Maybe worth another win or 2 this season, which in the 2004 NFC is right in the thick of the playoffs.

Maybe not, IMHO...At the start of the season Patrick was still recovering from surgery, was gun-shy, and didn't have a grasp of Joe's offense. Apparently nobody knew the offense, as the whole package is finally coming together now; had Patrick started the season he would have been blamed for the ineptitude and who knows where he would be as he lost what little bit of confidence he had...I'm more comfortable watching Ramsey now (I'm down to only 2 or 3 "throw the ball!" each game) and hope it continues this week in that friggin hole-in-the-roof-where-the-sun-shines-on-one-part-of-the-field stadium...
I'm just stirrin' the pot and living in the '70s.
User avatar
hailskins666
aka Evil Hog
aka Evil Hog
Posts: 6481
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 9:01 am
Location: South of Heaven, trying to hit a toilet on shrooms
Contact:

Post by hailskins666 »

friggin hole-in-the-roof-where-the-sun-shines-on-one-part-of-the-field stadium...
ROTFALMAO
THN's resident jerk.

Glock .40 Model 22 - First* line of home defense.... 'ADT' is for liberals.
welch
Skins History Buff
Skins History Buff
Posts: 6000
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: New York, NY

Post by welch »

I'm glad that the team looks better and better now. That was my hope for the season.

There is no telling what would have happened if Ramsey had started the season, but an offense requires a lot of practice under fire, coordination. We saw that:

- the whole offense was very ragged at first

- the OL has gotten better, but still is not finished. No Jansen, Raymer says that he needs to work hard on weights to be stronger for next year...

- no evidence from last year, from pre-season, or from the Giants game that Ramsey understood how to run the team. He has been learning, getting better and better

I just want them to beat the Cowboys. That amounts to a playoff game.
User avatar
Texas Hog
... deep in TX
... deep in TX
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 2:50 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Contact:

Post by Texas Hog »

Patrick can buy my loyalty with a good performance tomorrow against the pukes.

Let's face it, tomorrow is the biggest game we've had in years. If PRam chokes and plays poorly, I for one won't be sold on our future at QB....I doubt many will.

That said....go Patrick! Show us what your made of and make some plays.
God bless our troops and Joe Gibbs.
We'll miss you, Joe.


#21 gone, but never forgotten.
Post Reply