Pierce

John Manfreda · Post by **John Manfreda** » Sat Dec 18, 2004 5:30 pm

He will be resigned.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/sports/2 ... -9560r.htm

REDEEMEDSKIN · Post by **REDEEMEDSKIN** » Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:15 am

Aww, man!!!! Well, at least it's better than getting fired, or cut, in this case.

OH, :shock:

re-signed!!!!! My bad. YAY!!! :lol:

Cooley47 · Post by **Cooley47** » Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:30 pm

Antonio Pierce is a good fit for our defense and I am glad that he will be re-signed he is finally starting to become a pro bowl caliber player

I can't wait to see Pierce play next year

RedskinsRule56 · Post by **RedskinsRule56** » Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:31 pm

YES YES YES AND YES!! Great now we just need to resign my boy SMOOT!

Jake · Post by **Jake** » Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:01 pm

Beat ya a while ago. Gotta check the dates on the articles, my friend. http://www.the-hogs.net/forum/viewtopic. ... ht=#100431

1fan4ramsey · Post by **1fan4ramsey** » Wed Dec 22, 2004 11:00 pm

With Pierce staying, where does that leave Barrow?

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Wed Dec 22, 2004 11:13 pm

1fan4ramsey wrote:With Pierce staying, where does that leave Barrow?

On the bench.

1fan4ramsey · Post by **1fan4ramsey** » Wed Dec 22, 2004 11:23 pm

JSPB22 wrote:
1fan4ramsey wrote:With Pierce staying, where does that leave Barrow?

On the bench.

That's alot of money tied up in back ups (Barrow, Brunell) :cry:

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Wed Dec 22, 2004 11:25 pm

It sure is, but would you rather win games, or worry about Danny's financial troubles?

1fan4ramsey · Post by **1fan4ramsey** » Wed Dec 22, 2004 11:34 pm

JSPB22 wrote:It sure is, but would you rather win games, or worry about Danny's financial troubles?

Danny's financial troubles are not what I was thinking of. The fact that this money is being waisted to pay players that are riding the pine and could be spent on productive players is what bothers me. Salary cap is what 77 million, why waste soo much on back ups? Problem is if we cut them the salary cap hit is even greater.

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Wed Dec 22, 2004 11:38 pm

Actually, the cap will be $85 million next year.

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:30 am

1fan4ramsey wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:It sure is, but would you rather win games, or worry about Danny's financial troubles?

Danny's financial troubles are not what I was thinking of. The fact that this money is being waisted to pay players that are riding the pine and could be spent on productive players is what bothers me. Salary cap is what 77 million, why waste soo much on back ups? Problem is if we cut them the salary cap hit is even greater.

Barrows Cap hit wouldn't be that bad, he signed a cap freindly deal last year 13 million but only 2.5 of that was signing bonus money ( money that would count against the cap if he isn't here)

His cap hit next year is 2.15 million if we cut him before June 1 we would save $67,000 and that would be the end of that. Cutting him after June 1 would result in a savings of $1.109 million then take another hit in 2006 of $1.041 million.

But I see no reason to release him, it's not like he hasn't fit into our system (he hasn't played) Where are we going to fine a MLB of his caliber for 2.15 mil to back up AP (He may not have played this year but he has been in this system for a year) 2006 we'll be looking at $3.417 mil in cap money if he's on the team. We should revisit this option then.

Rypien11 · Post by **Rypien11** » Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:38 pm

Regardless of who rides the pine, Pierce is a great fit and is a huge keeper!
As in past years, I hope that we don't see the need to sign some other overpriced and over the hill veterans this off-season to become eventual bench fodder...