Giants: Unhappy Shockey sees other TEs passing him by

Talk about the AFC, NFC, the NFL Draft, College Football... anything football that has no Washington Football Team relevance.
Post Reply
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Giants: Unhappy Shockey sees other TEs passing him by

Post by 1niksder »

Giants: Unhappy Shockey sees other TEs passing him by Wednesday, December 08, 2004
BY MIKE GARAFOLO
Six days ago, Giants' tight end Jeremy Shockey unleashed a 10-minute, profanity-laced tirade on the team's poor morale and his limited effectiveness in coach Tom Coughlin's offense. Three days ago, after a 31-7 loss to the Redskins, Shockey said Coughlin's system had turned him into "an average player."

Something is gnawing at Shockey, but he won't say exactly what it is.

Here's a theory: His numbers are dropping, and he is slipping down the ladder of the top tight ends in the NFL.


Shockey was arguably No. 2 behind the Chiefs' Tony Gonzalez before the season, but now has probably been passed by Antonio Gates (Chargers), Alge Crumpler (Falcons) and Jason Witten (Cowboys). Crumpler has fewer catches than Shockey but has been more explosive, with 16.2 yards per catch.

"You all write it, you all come up with it," Shockey said last week. "I'm not going to give you the easy way out and tell you all the answers."

In former coach Jim Fassel's offense, Shockey was a star. As a rookie, he caught 74 passes for 894 yards, an average of 12.1 yards per catch. In Shockey's second year, also under Fassel, the numbers dropped off, but that was because he missed the final seven games with a knee injury.

Now, in Coughlin's first season, the numbers are slipping even further. Shockey has spent more time blocking in an attempt to protect the quarterbacks, but the Giants also have shortened his routes, making it difficult for him to make big plays. He has only seven receptions of 20 yards or more, just two in the past five games.

Earlier in the season, Shockey had complained because he was uncomfortable with the increased blocking demands. He also said pre-snap movement was sapping his energy.

Though he denied altering Shockey's role, Coughlin made adjustments to keep his tight end happy. But those changes might have led to Shockey's latest complaints.

The motion in Coughlin's offense is designed to create mismatches, confuse the defense and get Shockey into the secondary more easily. And now, even when the Giants line up Shockey as a wide receiver, defenses expect the ball to go to him and adjust.

So what will make Shockey happy? The answer might be as simple as changing the routes he runs.

In his first two years, Shockey was utilized as a vertical threat, capable of picking up chunks of yardage. The seam route -- he would line up at tight end and simply run through the lane between the linebacker, safety and cornerback -- and the wheel --he would start in the slot and run toward the sideline before turning upfield -- were effective plays.

But under Coughlin, the seam route has been ineffective lately. Shockey dropped a pass three games ago against the Falcons when two defenders converged on him as he caught the ball. Two weeks earlier, a miscommunication on the route with quarterback Kurt Warner resulted in an interception by the Bears.

And the wheel route might not even be in the playbook.

Because he is asked to run mostly short hooks and quick outs, Shockey rarely gets an opportunity to break away from a linebacker, catch a ball on the run and power over a defensive back or two. When he catches a pass now, he often is hit immediately.

In 2002, Shockey averaged 5.8 yards after the catch. That number dipped to four yards last year before sliding to 3.7 this season.

Shockey isn't pointing fingers only at the coaches, he also is wondering about his teammates.

"I think it might be the different scheme, people just aren't getting it, I don't know why," Shockey said after Sunday's loss. "I don't think they're really studying it when they go home, not putting 100 percent into it."
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
User avatar
Primetime42
Hog
Posts: 1727
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 12:09 am
Location: Romo-sexual

Post by Primetime42 »

Whatever. Good for him.

Witten's better :D
"He's a playmaker, that's his label. They used to have strong safeties, but now they got another position: They're called playmakers." -Terence Newman on Roy Williams
General Failure
Hog
Posts: 3472
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Croydon, PA
Contact:

Post by General Failure »

I'd take any other starting TE in the NFCE over Shockey right now.
I got your number. I steal your thunder. I got your mother's maiden name tattooed on my arm.
User avatar
Redskin Stouff
Hog
Posts: 450
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 9:16 am
Location: London, Ontario

Post by Redskin Stouff »

Shockey's a loser. I can't believe Coughlin is putting up with his BS.
How many more sleeps until next season?
JansenFan
and Jackson
and Jackson
Posts: 8387
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 10:37 am
Location: Charles Town, WV
Contact:

Post by JansenFan »

Man, I can't believe I had to bust this out twice in one week, but here you go Mr. Suckey...errrr....Shockey.
Image
RIP 21

"Nah, I trust the laws of nature to stay constant. I don't pray that the sun will rise tomorrow, and I don't need to pray that someone will beat the Cowboys in the playoffs." - Irn-Bru
tcwest10
put AM in the HOF
put AM in the HOF
Posts: 8730
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 10:08 pm
Location: NEPA

Post by tcwest10 »

Shockey whining again ?
In NY, you'd think he was the second coming of Elvis the way the media and NYG fans hang on his every word.
At day's end, he's just another player to me. Nothing special.
"Sit back and watch the Redskins.
SOMETHING MAGICAL IS ABOUT TO BEGIN!"
JPFair- A fan's fan. RIP, brother
welch
Skins History Buff
Skins History Buff
Posts: 6000
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: New York, NY

Post by welch »

Six days ago, Giants' tight end Jeremy Shockey unleashed a 10-minute, profanity-laced tirade on the team's poor morale and his limited effectiveness in coach Tom Coughlin's offense. Three days ago, after a 31-7 loss to the Redskins, Shockey said Coughlin's system had turned him into "an average player."


Does Shockey add as much as he subtracts from the Giants?

It's hard to imagine that Coughlin will tolerate him much longer.
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Post by Irn-Bru »

General Failure wrote:I'd take any other starting TE in the NFCE over Shockey right now.


Are you counting Royal as our TE, or are you referring to Cooley with this statement? (Just curious)
General Failure
Hog
Posts: 3472
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Croydon, PA
Contact:

Post by General Failure »

I'll go with Cooley, even if he's not supposed to be considered the TE. But heck, if Alstott can be considered a FB Cooley can be The King of Carolina for all I care. :)
I got your number. I steal your thunder. I got your mother's maiden name tattooed on my arm.
Post Reply