
Ramsey in triple coverage throws away the game.RUN RUN RUN
Good thinking Gibbs.

Redskins2k5 wrote:I thought when we brought Gibbs in we were automatic winners.But were not i dont think he has figured out that clinton portis can run. If clinton would of ran more we would beat Philly. But what did he do he relyed on patrick Ramsey.
Ramsey in triple coverage throws away the game.RUN RUN RUN
Good thinking Gibbs.
Redskins2k5 wrote:I thought when we brought Gibbs in we were automatic winners.But were not i dont think he has figured out that clinton portis can run. If clinton would of ran more we would beat Philly. But what did he do he relyed on patrick Ramsey.
Ramsey in triple coverage throws away the game.RUN RUN RUN
Good thinking Gibbs.
I thought when we brought Gibbs in we were automatic winners.
But were not i dont think he has figured out that clinton portis can run.
JohnKilroy wrote:Joe had to go for the win. Hall should not have been playing. He missed a field goal earlier. He hardly kicked off to start the second half. Maybe he makes a field goal to tie. Then barely kicks off. Philly gets it on their 35 yard line. Throws one more long pass, kicks a field goal and the game is over. Good call for Joe, go for the gusto. Too bad Patrick cant make a decision and throws it right to the green Jersey. And wasey really trying to get to the corner or what!
hatsOFF2gibbs wrote:WHY DO YOU GUYS LIKE THE PLAY???????????
Even if we had scored the TD, the Eagles had 1:50 on the clock and 3 timeouts. When these things are added up with the Eagles, you know they could've EASILY scored! Look how they've won their other games!
Here are the plays they could have done:
Deep bomb to T.O.
McNabb runs for 1st downs and then outside all the way
Screen passes to Westbrook
The way I see it ------ TD, TD, TD!!!!
However good our Defense is, they would've capitilized and won out the game. Come one now! It's the E-A-G-L-E-S!!!!!!!
We should have run the ball with Clinton, wasted some time, made them take timeouts, and then when we got closer....throw the ball into the endzone!!!!!!!!!!
And even if we did not get the TD, we would've aleast gotten the Field Goal and gone into O.T., which I think is a hell lot better than losing!
That was a horrible play, even if it did work!
DEHog wrote:hatsOFF2gibbs wrote:WHY DO YOU GUYS LIKE THE PLAY???????????
Even if we had scored the TD, the Eagles had 1:50 on the clock and 3 timeouts. When these things are added up with the Eagles, you know they could've EASILY scored! Look how they've won their other games!
Here are the plays they could have done:
Deep bomb to T.O.
McNabb runs for 1st downs and then outside all the way
Screen passes to Westbrook
The way I see it ------ TD, TD, TD!!!!
However good our Defense is, they would've capitilized and won out the game. Come one now! It's the E-A-G-L-E-S!!!!!!!
We should have run the ball with Clinton, wasted some time, made them take timeouts, and then when we got closer....throw the ball into the endzone!!!!!!!!!!
And even if we did not get the TD, we would've aleast gotten the Field Goal and gone into O.T., which I think is a hell lot better than losing!
That was a horrible play, even if it did work!
Funny I don't remember any of those things happening!! Patrick had to throw it in the stands plain and simple. I still like thie call!
In the famous words of a coach not too far from where I am seating, because:hatsOFF2gibbs wrote:WHY DO YOU GUYS LIKE THE PLAY???????????
I thought when we brought Gibbs in we were automatic winners. But were not i dont think he has figured out that clinton portis can run. If clinton would of ran more we would beat Philly. But what did he do he relyed on patrick Ramsey.
Ramsey in triple coverage throws away the game.RUN RUN RUN
Good thinking Gibbs.
hatsOFF2gibbs wrote:WHY DO YOU GUYS LIKE THE PLAY???????????
Even if we had scored the TD, the Eagles had 1:50 on the clock and 3 timeouts. When these things are added up with the Eagles, you know they could've EASILY scored! Look how they've won their other games!
Here are the plays they could have done:
Deep bomb to T.O.
McNabb runs for 1st downs and then outside all the way
Screen passes to Westbrook
The way I see it ------ TD, TD, TD!!!!
However good our Defense is, they would've capitilized and won out the game. Come one now! It's the E-A-G-L-E-S!!!!!!!
We should have run the ball with Clinton, wasted some time, made them take timeouts, and then when we got closer....throw the ball into the endzone!!!!!!!!!!
And even if we did not get the TD, we would've aleast gotten the Field Goal and gone into O.T., which I think is a hell lot better than losing!
That was a horrible play, even if it did work!
Redskin in Canada wrote:In the famous words of a coach not too far from where I am seating, because:hatsOFF2gibbs wrote:WHY DO YOU GUYS LIKE THE PLAY???????????
YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME!!!
HELLO???!!!
YOU-PLAY-TO-WIN-THE-GAME!!!
Now, let me explain it -again- once more:
YOU-PLAY-TO-WIN-THE-GAME
Is that didactic enough? No? repeat after me:
YOU-PLAY-TO...
If Ramsey would have thrown the ball away it would have been 2 and 10 and the Defense would have been on their heels. That's when we could run time off the clock picking up a 1st down and moving down the field. We were already in FG range with a healthy J Hall. But going for the win was definatly the right call. It lets the players know that the coach wants to win, will take his shots and not always playit close to the vest.
Ramsey will/has learn from this, which will only help this team so win or lose we are a better team because of one play that also caused us the game.