The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

So who do you guys think are 5 receivers in the NFL? Here's my list.

1.Randy Moss
2.Terrel Owens
3.Marvin Harrison
4.Torry Holt
5.Chad Johnson

I agree with you except for Chad. I think there are some better WR's out there than him.

Not a bad list but you have the wrong Johnson that should read Andre

1niksder wrote:Not a bad list but you have the wrong Johnson that should read Andre

Are you going to list yours, or just keep on telling me that Chad is not in the top 5?

VA Bengal wrote:

1niksder wrote:Not a bad list but you have the wrong Johnson that should read Andre

Are you going to list yours, or just keep on telling me that Chad is not in the top 5?

I guess I have to spell it out for you
1.Randy Moss
2.Terrel Owens
3.Marvin Harrison
4.Torry Holt
5.Andre Johnson

Now do you understand???

My list is the same as yours, except number 5 is Hines Ward.

1niksder wrote:Not a bad list but you have the wrong Johnson that should read Andre

Just wondering why you think Andre Johnson is better than Chad since you're so big on numbers?

Andre Johnson- REC:111 YDS:1,669 AVG:15.0 TD:8

Chad Johnson- REC:231 YDS:3,474 AVG:15.0 TD:18

It appears that you think the first half of this season has determined who the top 5 receivers in the NFL are.

Chad has been playing for 4 years Andre is in his 2nd Johnson should have higher numbers
I made my choices based on the 2004 season and the players that I think are the top 5
You can think what you want about Chad Johnson but I don't have to agree

1niksder wrote:

VA Bengal wrote:

1niksder wrote:Not a bad list but you have the wrong Johnson that should read Andre

Are you going to list yours, or just keep on telling me that Chad is not in the top 5?

I guess I have to spell it out for you
1.Randy Moss
2.Terrel Owens
3.Marvin Harrison
4.Torry Holt
5.Andre Johnson

Now do you understand???

Didn't you say Randy Moss was about equal to Chad Johnson there creamy?

1niksder wrote:Chad has been playing for 4 years Andre is in his 2nd Johnson should have higher numbers
I made my choices based on the 2004 season and the players that I think are the top 5
You can think what you want about Chad Johnson but I don't have to agree

OK buddy.

VA Bengal wrote:Didn't you say Randy Moss was about equal to Chad Johnson there creamy?

Re-read the post .... for the third time that was Santana Moss that I compared Johnson to not Randy. Two different players same last name

1niksder wrote:

VA Bengal wrote:Didn't you say Randy Moss was about equal to Chad Johnson there creamy?

Re-read the post .... for the third time that was Santana Moss that I compared Johnson to not Randy. Two different players same last name

OK OK...My fault.

VA Bengal. You are an OK guy. Welcome to our board. I hope you stick around after the game, win or lose.

santana aint done a damn thing all season.

chad if not top 5, hes top 8 in the league.

Redskin in Canada wrote:VA Bengal. You are an OK guy. Welcome to our board. I hope you stick around after the game, win or lose.

Well thanks man. Will do...You guys are alright here.

jditty47 wrote:santana aint done a damn thing all season.

chad if not top 5, hes top 8 in the league.

No one put Santana in the top 5, but Santana and C. Johnson have similar numbers, as was pointed out in another thread.

similar numbers mb 2 weeks a year. Santana cant hold chad's jock. man can my boy get SOME respect plz

cvillehog wrote:

jditty47 wrote:santana aint done a damn thing all season.

chad if not top 5, hes top 8 in the league.

No one put Santana in the top 5, but Santana and C. Johnson have similar numbers, as was pointed out in another thread.

Yes I know. I misread it. I've been switching back and forth from my work and this board all night, so my eyes aren't working good my bad...

VA Bengal wrote:

cvillehog wrote:

jditty47 wrote:santana aint done a damn thing all season.

chad if not top 5, hes top 8 in the league.

No one put Santana in the top 5, but Santana and C. Johnson have similar numbers, as was pointed out in another thread.

Yes I know. I misread it. I've been switching back and forth from my work and this board all night, so my eyes aren't working good my bad...

I know you know, I was pointing it out to jditty47, who seems just late enough to the conversation to have missed the original thread.

Hines Ward is a lot better than Chad Johnson. So is Coles.

1.Coles
2.Gardner
3.Jacobs
4.Thrash
5.McCants

Montana Redskin wrote:1.Coles
2.Gardner
3.Jacobs
4.Thrash
5.McCants

Agreed but not in that order. Instead:

1.Coles
2.Jacobs
3.Thrash and a tie
4.Gardner and McCants

Redskin in Canada wrote:

Montana Redskin wrote:1.Coles
2.Gardner
3.Jacobs
4.Thrash
5.McCants

Agreed but not in that order. Instead:

1.Coles
2.Jacobs
3.Thrash and a tie
4.Gardner and McCants

Ouch! You are going to hurt Gardner's feelings with that!

I still prefer to call him "McHands" instead of McCants, because McCants sounds so negative and the man is (was) a TD catching machine!

cvillehog wrote:Ouch! You are going to hurt Gardner's feelings with that!

If he had caught a TD pass from Patrick, our story would be different. An interception followed that drop. He has A LOT of making up to do in my book before I remove the 50/50 tag from him.

1.Gardner
2.Coles
3.McCants
4.Jacobs
5.Thrash