Page 1 of 1

Riggo says.............

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:15 am
by NikiH
We are watching now, don't know if anyone else is but, Riggins says "the redskins are at a point now where they need to think why not try someone else." I agree completely and I hope Gibbs is watching and picking up the phone to call Rasmey right now! ;-)

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 5:55 am
by SkinsLaVar
Gibbs sticks to his qbs like glue. Dont expect a change to happen.


Are the Carolina Panthers North Carolina or South Carolina?? Any1 know??

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 9:41 am
by redskins-28
SkinsLaVar wrote:Are the Carolina Panthers North Carolina or South Carolina?? Any1 know??


North Carolina. :wink:

I never wish for anyone to get hurt, but I do with Brunell would at least pull a muscle or something. :twisted:

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:00 am
by NikiH
Were you watching Lavar? When they said Spurrier is going to SC I assumed they meant a college team. There was also mention of Miama for Spurrier, it would suck if he went there and actually produced.

As far as Gibbs sticking to his QB's. I'm thinking he may become "injured" during warm ups?? If you remember before we cut Kenyatta Jones they said he had an injury to keep him from playing, HOWEVER Jones said he was fine to play. Hmmmmmmmmmm

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:30 am
by skinsfan44
It's going to take an injury to Brunell for Gibbs to put in Ramsey. I don't like that much, but you got to respect what Gibbs is trying to do.

He knows his players way more then anyone of us.

I'm going to take the "wait and see" atitude for now.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:09 am
by NC43Hog
Are the Carolina Panthers North Carolina or South Carolina?? Any1 know??


They are in Charlotte, but are supposed to represent both Carolinas - hence the Carolina Panthers.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 am
by cvillehog
NC43Hog wrote:
Are the Carolina Panthers North Carolina or South Carolina?? Any1 know??


They are in Charlotte, but are supposed to represent both Carolinas - hence the Carolina Panthers.


They should've built the stadium at Carowinds, doesn't that span the border? :lol:

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 1:29 pm
by DeathByLinebacker#56
Riggo also told Supreme court justice "loosen up Sandy baby, you're too tight".

Aaahhh that Riggo, just spewing forward obivous facts. :twisted:

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:52 pm
by NC43Hog
cvillehog wrote:They should've built the stadium at Carowinds, doesn't that span the border? :lol:


Especially after the roller coaster ride from last year to this!!! :cry:

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 5:44 pm
by IndySkinsFan
Check out the press conference today at 5pm, word i am hearing is Gibbs may be putting in Ramsey. I am ALL FOR either backup QB starting. Heck they CANT do much worse than 58 passing yards


edit:

He said it was his plan to only throw 2 passes in the second half. What he did not say was that he did not trust the passing attack. Between you and me, i think he was afraid to pass it.

He did mention Brunell missed some things, about time !

He did not talk about replacing brunell, he talked about how brunell did a good job to keep us out of trouble. MAN he needs to wake the heck up and realize that 58 yards passing SUCKS big time and indicates a problem with the offense. We cannot be a good team until we can pass the freaking ball !

for the record, mark is starting .... so much for rumors ;-\

Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 3:16 pm
by JohnKilroy
Ramsey sure is not the answer. He cant get out of his own way, throws bad passes etc. It least Brunell knows when to throw the ball out of bounds. Ramsey cant find a receiver and either gets sacked or just throws it. Stick with Brunell and maybe we can get a arm with a body next year. Have we got a GM that can spot young talent?

Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 3:31 pm
by Brandon777
JohnKilroy wrote:Ramsey sure is not the answer. He cant get out of his own way, throws bad passes etc. It least Brunell knows when to throw the ball out of bounds. Ramsey cant find a receiver and either gets sacked or just throws it. Stick with Brunell and maybe we can get a arm with a body next year. Have we got a GM that can spot young talent?
Welcome JohnKilroy. You will find that you're in the minority here in regards to Ramsey. There are a few of us here that can see that Ramsey is not the answer, but we are definetly in the minority.

Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 3:35 pm
by cvillehog
Brandon777 wrote:
JohnKilroy wrote:Ramsey sure is not the answer. He cant get out of his own way, throws bad passes etc. It least Brunell knows when to throw the ball out of bounds. Ramsey cant find a receiver and either gets sacked or just throws it. Stick with Brunell and maybe we can get a arm with a body next year. Have we got a GM that can spot young talent?
Welcome JohnKilroy. You will find that you're in the minority here in regards to Ramsey. There are a few of us here that can see that Ramsey is not the answer, but we are definetly in the minority.


How will we know if Ramsey is the answer or not unless he plays?

If he isn't the answer, how can we afford someone who is after throwing all that money at Brunell?

Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 3:52 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
We are watching now, don't know if anyone else is but, Riggins says "the redskins are at a point now where they need to think why not try someone else."
Didn't he also say mohawks were cool back in the day?? Yeah, a lotta credibility in HIM when it comes to personnel decisions, eh?
Image

Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2004 5:50 pm
by NC43Hog
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
We are watching now, don't know if anyone else is but, Riggins says "the redskins are at a point now where they need to think why not try someone else."
Didn't he also say mohawks were cool back in the day?? Yeah, a lotta credibility in HIM when it comes to personnel decisions, eh?
Image


I thought that was a great look. :rock: