The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

When will we know who is inactive. If McCants doesn't play again, I'll be livid. A solid receiver does no good sitting on the bench.

Why do the Redskins keep putting him on the inactive list? Is he hurt, or do the coaches just feel that McCants is the weakest of the five wideouts? I don't feel good about this. It almost seems to me like McCants may have an attitide problem that's keeping him off the field.

Joe Gibbs has said it's not his attitude. That's it's the constraints of only having so many people dress for the game. I don't quite understand it becaue I thought everyone on the roster dressed for the game. I'm hoping though with the few injuries and people out we will have room for him either way. I would definitely choose McCants over Gardner. but the choice isn't mine.

Gibbs has said publicly he will only suit up four WR. Since McCants does not play Special Teams and Thrash and Jacobs do, McCants is the odd man out. I would like to see them give McCants a start over Gardner. I still can't believe Gardner dropped that catch in the endzone.

I would definitely make Gardner inactive and put McCants in there. I don't see how Gibbs can think Gardner is more talented that Darnerien. Darnerien can CATCH! That's the most important aspect of being a receiver.

hkiss444 wrote:I still can't believe Gardner dropped that catch in the endzone.

I can.

Maybe this is the last chance for Gardner?

he's had too many chances already

Well, I still think it stinks that McCants is not playing...whatever bs reason they want to use. I'm still wearing my McCants jersey !!! Hopefully Rod learned how to catch this week. Would have been nice had he learned LAST WEEK....wasn't that the GAME WINNER HE DROPPED IN THE END ZONE ???
AHHHHHHHHHH!!!! It just makes me crazy !!!

SkinsChic wrote:....wasn't that the GAME WINNER HE DROPPED IN THE END ZONE ???

Wasn't that also the play immediately preceeding on of our 7 turnovers?